BTM7303 Research Methods Week 10
PLEASE USE THE FEEDBACK ATTACHED FROM LAST WEEK, FOR THIS WEEKS ASSIGNMENT!!!!
PLEASE CAREFULLY ANSWER EACH QUESTION!!!
Taking what you have learned from the readings and the feedback given on your past assignments, present a mini proposal (5-7 pages) that includes the following:
Statement of problem. Provide a clear justification with evidence on why this study is relevant to your field and worthy of doctoral-level study. Support your efforts using scholarly information published within the past 5 years to ensure relevancy. Remember the problem statement should reflect your degree type (applied or research).
Purpose statement (how your study will address the problem using quantitative methodology). This statement should flow from the problem statement.
Research questions (make sure there is alignment with the problem and purpose).
Find 2 to 3 articles related to your topic of interest and provide an overview of the research methodology and design where you specifically discuss the elements below from each article and discuss how each applies (or does not apply to your current study):
- A specific quantitative design,
- The population and sample,
- Steps for data collection and protection of human subjects,
- Steps for the analysis of the data, and
- Issues of reliability and validity within a quantitative framework.
5. Based on your analysis above, what seems most applicable to your hypothetical study and why? Be sure to discuss the quantitative design, population and sample, data collection, analysis, reliability, and validity.
6. Discussion of the inherent strengths and challenges of your hypothetical study to include any ethical considerations that might need to be addressed in the study.
Make sure to support all assertions and research choices, using the course resources as well as additional scholarly literature you have found.
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
Dane, F.C. (2011) Evaluating research: Methodology for people who need to read research. | Read Chapter 6 (pp. 127-157) |
Krathwohl, D. (2009) Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods. | Read Chapter 7 (pp. 133-157) |
Robinson Kurpius, S.E. & Stafford, M.E. (2006). Reliability: The same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. http://srmo.sagepub.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/view/testing-and-measurement/SAGE.xml | Read pp. 121-141 |
Robinson Kurpius, S.E. & Stafford, M.E. (2006). Validity: What you see is not always what you get. http://srmo.sagepub.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/view/testing-and-measurement/n10.xml | Read pp. 141-162 |
| Articles | |
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Par 1: Quantitative research. http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_quantitative_research_bjn.pdf | Read article |
10 years ago
20
Purchase the answer to view it

- pay_inequality1.doc
- HSM 410 Healthcare Policy Week 1 Discussions Devry
- Topic: The lessons for this module/week have explained many important reasons for Christians to study secular literature. Choose something from the lessons that you agree with or disagree with and explain your reasons. Both your thread and your reply must
- Week 3
- LASA 1: Organisms in Your Biome
- Assignment 3: Creating a Domain Model Class Diagram
- The Study Of Organizational Behavior MCQ
- Week 4 assignment
- Use Ch. 1, 2, & 3 of Visualizing Nutrition, supplemental course materials, the University Library, the Internet, or other resources to answer the following questions. Your response to each question should be 75 to 100 words.
- Construct a 95% Confidence Interval
- FIN 571 WILEY WEEK 6 LATEST ONE. 100% SCORE