Bank Supervisors case
Forty-eight male bank supervisors were each given the same personal file and asked to judge whether the person should be promoted to a branch manager job that was described as "routine", or the file held and other applicants interviewed.
The files were identical except that half of them showed that the file was that of a female and half showed that the file was that of a male. Of the 24 "male files”, 21 were recommended for promotion. Of the 24 "female files”, 14 were recommended for promotion. [Rosen and Jerdee, 1974].
References:
B. Rosen, and Jerdee T., "influence of Sex Role Stereotypes on Personnel Decisions," Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 1974, pages 9-14.
Is the information as published convincing evidence that the bank supervisors discriminated against female applicants, or could the difference in the number recommended for promotion reasonably attributed to chance?
Please refer only to the information published.
12 years ago
5
Purchase the answer to view it

- 150-200 Words Personal Response(High School)
- Help!
- Maths - A health inspector at a restaurant will enter the kitchen
- Create the logic for a program that calculates and displays the amount
- 3.In working in vastly different environments, how can the leaders of the organization keep current on the changes that the presence of the organization will bring to each location?
- U4DB
- MGT 445 Week 1 - Communication and Personality in Negotiation
- IT 210 Week 8 Assignment - Object Oriented Design
- two page paperrr
- HHS 255 Week 3 - Medical Record Privacy