Assignment 3: Moneyball

profileroswor
  • Assignment 3: Moneyball

    Moneyball, a book by Michael Lewis (2003), highlights how creativity, framing, and robust technical analysis all played a part in the development of a new approach to talent management in baseball. It also exhibited great examples of the biases and psychological pitfalls that plague decision makers.

    Review the article “Who’s on First?” by Thaler & Sunstein (2003) from this module’s assigned readings. This article reviews the book Moneyball by Michael Lewis.

    Write a critique of the article including the following points:

    • Examine why sabermetric-based player evaluation is such a shock to other executives in baseball.
    • Evaluate why Beane is much more effective in his success by constructing a matrix of pitfalls and heuristics that highlight the differences between Beane’s team and other executives.
    • Moneyball highlights how people tend to overestimate the likelihood of success and end up facing financial loss—in this case, it meant forfeiting millions of dollars. Analyze a professional or personal decision (yours or otherwise) that highlights this predilection in spite of substantial losses.
    • Explain how you would apply Moneyball’s management lessons in your own endeavors.

    Write a 3–5-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.

    By Wednesday, January 21, 2015, deliver your assignment to the M1 Assignment 3 Dropbox.

    Lewis, M. (2003). Moneyball. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
    Maximum Points
    Explained why sabermetric-based player evaluation is a shock to other executives in baseball.
    12
    Analyzed Beane’s effectiveness in a matrix of pitfalls and heuristics.
    24
    Analyzed a professional or personal decision that highlights the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of success.
    24
    Applied Moneyball management lessons in personal endeavors.
    20
    Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
    20
    Total:
    100
  • This is the link 
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Who's on first? New Republic, 229(9), 27–30.http://ehis.ebscohost.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/eds/detail?sid=382ae552-96f2-446c-8371-3877f6f0ad63%40sessionmgr111&vid=1&hid=116&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=pwh&AN=10644212
    • 11 years ago
    • 15
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      moneyball_.doc
    Bids(0)
    other Questions(10)