Assignment 3: Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit

Assignment 3: Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit
Due Week 10 and worth 260 points

In order to complete this assignment, refer to the Case Study titled “Communication Dilemma—Getting Credit” found in Chapter 7 of your Reeves textbook. In addition, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research the gender communication structure in three (3) countries of your choosing.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

1. Propose three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Suggest two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Justify your response.
2. Compare and contrast Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Next, speculate on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Provide support for your response.
3. Imagine if you were in Robert’s shoes. Suggest three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia. Next, imagine that you are Claudia. Suggest the main actions that you would take in this situation. Justify your response.
4. Compare and contrast three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Next, identify one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, suggest two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, suggest two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Justify your response.
5. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

6. 1. Propose three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Suggest two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Justify your response.   Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely proposed three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.	Partially proposed three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Partially suggested two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Partially justified your response.	Satisfactorily proposed three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Satisfactorily suggested two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Satisfactorily justified your response.	Thoroughly proposed three (3) lessons you can learn from gender communication in business. Thoroughly suggested two (2) ways that gender communication in business can affect a business as a whole. Thoroughly justified your response.
   2. Compare and contrast Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Next, speculate on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Provide support for your response. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Did not submit or incompletely speculated on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your response.	Partially compared and contrasted Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Partially speculated on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Partially provided support for your response.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Satisfactorily speculated on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Satisfactorily provided support for your response.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted Robert’s and Claudia’s styles of communication. Thoroughly speculated on three (3) ways that their communication styles impacted their handling of the situation. Thoroughly provided support for your response.
   3. Imagine if you were in Robert’s shoes. Suggest three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia. Next, imagine that you are Claudia. Suggest the main actions that you would take in this situation. Justify your response.   Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia, if you were in Robert’s shoes. Did not submit or incompletely suggested the main actions that you would take in this situation if you were Claudia. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.	Partially suggested three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia, if you were in Robert’s shoes.. Partially suggested the main actions that you would take in this situation if you were Claudia. Partially justified your response.	Satisfactorily suggested three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia, if you were in Robert’s shoes. Satisfactorily suggested the main actions that you would take in this situation if you were Claudia. Satisfactorily justified your response.	Thoroughly suggested three (3) ways that you could deal with the situation with Claudia, if you were in Robert’s shoes. Thoroughly suggested the main actions that you would take in this situation if you were Claudia. Thoroughly justified your response.
   4. Compare and contrast three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Next, identify one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, suggest two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, suggest two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Justify your response.   Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Did not submit or incompletely identified one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.	Partially compared and contrasted three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Partially identified one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, partially suggested two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, partially suggested two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Partially justified your response.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Satisfactorily identified one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, satisfactorily suggested two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, satisfactorily suggested two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Satisfactorily justified your response.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted three (3) ways your selected countries’ gender communications are similar or differ. Thoroughly identified one (1) common element from your selected countries’ gender communications; then, thoroughly suggested two (2) reasons why this element is prevalent in all of your selected countries. If your selected countries’ gender communications do not share any common elements, thoroughly suggested two (2) reasons as to why this is the case. Thoroughly justified your response.
   5. 2 references   Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
   6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements   Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors presen