Analysis of the Chile Mine Resue

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 %Explanation of How the Case Study Demonstrates Flexibility and Adaptability

Paper does not include an explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability.

Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.

Paper provides an elemental explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Some subject knowledge is evident.

Paper provides an explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.

Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study demonstrates flexibility and adaptability. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.

15.0 %Explanation of How the Leaders in the Case Study Apply Aspects of the Path-Goal Theory

Paper does not include an explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory.

Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.

Paper provides an elemental explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Some subject knowledge is evident.

Paper provides an explanation of explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.

Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the leaders in the case study apply aspects of the path-goal theory. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.

15.0 %Explanation of How Leaders Communicate Effectively With All of the Stakeholders Involved and How Communication Could Be Improved

Paper does not include an explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved.

Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.

Paper provides an elemental explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Some subject knowledge is evident.

Paper provides an explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.

Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how leaders communicate effectively with all of the stakeholders involved and how communication could be improved. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.

15.0 %Explanation of How Well the Leaders Followed the Situational Approach to Leadership

Paper does not include an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership.

Paper provides an incomplete or insufficient an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.

Provides an elemental explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Some subject knowledge is evident.

Provides an explanation of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.

Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how well the leaders followed the situational approach to leadership. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.

10.0 %Explanation of How the Case Study Shapes How To Apply Goal-Path Theory and The Situational Approach In A Real World Situation

Does not include explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation.

Provides an incomplete or insufficient explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.

Provides an elemental explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Some subject knowledge is evident.

Provides an explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.

Paper provides a thorough and fully developed explanation of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions of how the case study shapes how to apply goal-path theory and the situational approach in a real world situation. Paper includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Paper demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecast the development of the paper. Thesis statement is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage