PSY/300 Week 2

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK FORM-

Content / Development (50%)

Grading Criteria:

E

G

A

N

N/A

Subject Matter:

Key elements of assignment covered

Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive

Displays an understanding of relevant theory

Major points supported by specific details/examples

Research is appropriate (peer reviewed) and timely (current) & used correctly

Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources

Higher-Order Thinking:

Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience

At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing

Points Earned:

Organization (20%)

Grading Criteria:

E

G

A

N

N/A

Introduction provides sufficient background on topic & previews points

Central theme/purpose is immediately clear

Structure is clear, logical and easy to follow

Sections/paragraphs are appropriately developed to support theme

Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the paper's body

Points Earned:

Style / Mechanics (30%)

Grading Criteria:

E

G

A

N

N/A

Format (10)%:

Citations/reference page follow guidelines

Properly cites ideas/information from other sources

Paper is laid out effectively -- uses headings other reader-friendly tools

Paper is neat & shows attention to detail and appropriate formatting including certificate of originality

Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling (10%):

Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed

Spelling is correct

Readability/Style (10%):

Sentences are complete, clear, and concise

Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure

Transitions between paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow

Words used are precise and unambiguous

The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment

Points Earned:

TOTAL POINTS EARNED:

Overall Comments:

Key: E = excellent; G = good; A = Adequate; N = not done; N/A = not applicable for this assignment.