|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
Points
Earned
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
40.0 % Summary
|
image1.wmf None of the key points of the article are identified in the summary.
|
image2.wmf Not all key points of the article are identified in the summary.
|
image3.wmf Summary identifies key points of the article.
|
image4.wmf Summary identifies key points of the article. Student connects the article to course content. Student explanation of key points demonstrates a basic understanding of the material.
|
image5.wmf Summary identifies key points of the article. Student connects the article to course content. Student explanation of key points demonstrates superior understanding of the material.
|
0/0
|
|
30.0 % Reaction
|
image6.wmf Reaction is not provided or is not related to the article content.
|
image7.wmf Not all points made in reaction are logical in response to the article content.
|
image8.wmf Reaction includes a logical response to article content.
|
image9.wmf Reaction includes a logical response to the article content, and an explanation of how student will use this new knowledge gained.
|
image10.wmf Reaction includes a logical response to the article content, and an explanation of how student will use this new knowledge gained. Explanation of how knowledge will be used is supported by at least one other outside resource.
|
0/0
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
|
image11.wmf Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
image12.wmf Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
image13.wmf Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
image14.wmf Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
image15.wmf Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
0/0
|
|
8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction
|
image16.wmf Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
image17.wmf Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
image18.wmf Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
image19.wmf Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
image20.wmf Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
0/0
|
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
image21.wmf Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
image22.wmf Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
image23.wmf Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
image24.wmf Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
image25.wmf Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
0/0
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
image26.wmf Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
image27.wmf Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
image28.wmf Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
image29.wmf Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
image30.wmf All format elements are correct.
|
0/0
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 % Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
image31.wmf No reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
image32.wmf Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
image33.wmf Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
image34.wmf Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
|
image35.wmf In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
|
0/0
|
|
100 % Total Weightage
|
|
0/50
|