Frank Pasquale used his father's social secuity number to obtain a credit card. Later, pretending to act on behalf of his father's firm, Pasquale borrowed $350,000. When he defaulted on the loan and his father confronted him, he produced forged documents that showed the loan had been paid. Adam associated, LLC, which held the unpaid loan, filed a suit against both Pasqualed. Should the court issue a judgment against the father and the son? Discuss. [Adams Associates, LLC v. Frank Pasquale Limited Partnership,_A.3d_(N.J.Super.A.D. 2011)]