Read the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case. You are to write a 4 page report that answers the following questions:

assignment_2_rubic.docx

Home >Human Resource Management homework help >Read the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case. You are to write a 4 page report that answers the following questions:

Outcome Assessed	 Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees.
Grading Rubric for Assignment # 2 - Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Criteria	0 Unacceptable	20 Developing	30 Competent	40 Exemplary
1. What were the legal issues in this case?	Did not complete the assignment or the legal issues were identified with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.	The legal issues were identified with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.	The legal issues were identified with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.	The legal issues were identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.
2. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim fail?	Did not complete the assignment or why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.
3. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeed?	Did not complete the assignment or Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with less than 70% accuracy and some information was inappropriate.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 70 to 79% accuracy and some information was inappropriate or was not identified.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 80 to 89% accuracy and appropriate information was identified.	Why the plaintiff’s disparate treatment claim succeeded was explained with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.
4. Identify at least three things that the TVA should have done differently with regard to interviewing and selecting candidates for these jobs?	Did not complete the assignment or did not identify any things that the TVA should have done differently.	Only one thing that the TVA should have done differently is identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.	Two things that the TVA should have done differently are identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.	At least three things that the TVA should have done differently are identified with 90 to 100% accuracy and all appropriate information was identified.
5. Clarity	Did not complete the assignment or explanations are unclear and not organized. (Major issues)	Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (Many issues)	Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues)	Explanations very clear and well organized. (Added helpful details.)
6. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage.	Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Major issues)	Had 6 - 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Many issues)	Had 4 - 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage. (Minor issues)	Had 0 - 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation or APA usage.