business short paper
1
This text was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License without
attribution as requested by the work’s original creator or licensee.
2
Chapter 6
Managing for Business Success
Noteworthy Management
Consider this scenario. You’re about halfway through the semester and ready for your
first round of midterms. You open up your class notes and declare them ―pathetic.‖ You
regret scribbling everything so carelessly (and skipping class so many times). You wish
you had better notes. That’s when it hits you: What if there was a note-taking service on
campus? When you were ready to study for a big test, you could buy complete (and
completely legible) class notes. You’ve heard that there are class-notes services at
some larger schools, but there’s no such thing on your campus. So you ask yourself,
why don’t I start a note-taking business? My upcoming set of exams may not be
salvageable, but after that, I’d always have great notes. And while I was at it, I could
learn how to manage a business (isn’t that what majoring in business is all about?).
So you sit down to work on your great business idea. First, you’ll hire a bunch of
students to take class notes and type them out. Then the notetakers will e-mail the
notes to your assistant, who’ll get them copied (on a special type of blue paper that
can’t be duplicated). The last step will be assembling packages of notes and, of course,
selling them. You decide to name your company ―Notes-4-You.‖
It sounds like a great idea, but you’re troubled by one question: Why does this business
need you? Do the notetakers need a boss? Couldn’t they just sell the notes
themselves? This process could work, but it would probably work a lot better if there
was someone to oversee the operations: a manager—someone like you—to make sure
that the operations involved in preparing and selling notes were performed in both an
3
effective and an efficient manner. You’d make the process effective by ensuring that the
right things got done and that they all contributed to the success of the enterprise. You’d
make the process efficient by ensuring that activities were performed in the right way
and used the fewest possible resources. That’s the job that you perform as a manager:
making a group of people more effective and efficient with you than they would be
without you.
Managerial Efficiency and Effectiveness
6.1 What Do Managers Do?
4
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Identify the four interrelated functions of management: planning, organizing, directing, and controlling.
You’ll accomplish this task through management: the process of planning, organizing,
directing, and controlling resources to achieve specific goals. A plan enables you to take
your business concept beyond the idea stage. It does not, however, get the work done.
You have to organize things if you want your plan to become a reality. You have to put
people and other resources in place to make things happen. And because your note-
taking venture is supposed to be better off with you in charge, you need to be
a leader who can motivate your people to do well. Finally, to know whether things are in
fact going well, you’ll have to control your operations—that is, measure the results and
compare them with the results that you laid out in your plan. gives you a good idea of
the interrelationship between planning and the other functions that managers perform.
Figure 6.1 The Role of Planning
Functions of Management
If you visit any small or large company, not-for-profit organization, or government
agency, you’ll find managers doing the same things you’d be doing to run your note-
taking business—planning, organizing, directing, and controlling. In the rest of the
chapter, we’ll look at these four interrelated functions in detail.
5
K E Y T A K E A W A Y S
Managers plan, organize, direct, and control resources to achieve specific goals.
In planning, they set goals and determine the best way to achieve them.
Organizing means allocating resources (people, equipment, and money) to carry out the company’s plans.
Directing is the process of providing focus for employees and motivating them to achieve organizational goals.
Controlling involves comparing actual to expected performance and taking corrective action when necessary.
E X E R C I S E
(AACSB) Analysis
Consider the things that the principal of your old high school had to do to ensure that the school met the needs of its students. Identify these activities and group them by the four functions of management: planning, organizing, directing, and controlling.
6.2 Planning
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Understand the process by which a company develops and implements a strategic plan.
Without a plan, it’s hard to succeed at anything. The reason is simple: if you don’t know
where you’re going, you can’t really move forward. Successful managers decide where
they want to be and then figure out how to get there. In planning, managers set goals
and determine the best way to achieve them. As a result of the planning process,
6
everyone in the organization knows what should be done, who should do it, and how it
should be done.
Developing a Strategic Plan
Coming up with an idea—say, starting a note-taking business—is a good start, but it’s
only a start. Planning for it is a step forward. Planning begins at the highest level and
works its way down through the organization. Step one is usually called
strategic planning, which is the process of establishing an overall course of action. To
begin this process, you should ask yourself a couple of very basic questions: Why, for
example, does the organization exist? What value does it create? Sam Walton posed
these questions in the process of founding Wal-Mart: his new chain of stores would
exist to offer customers the lowest prices with the best possible service. [1]
After you’ve identified the purpose of your company, you’re ready to take the remaining
steps in the strategic-planning process:
Write a mission statement that tells customers, employees, and others why your
organization exists.
Identify core values or beliefs that will guide the behavior of members of the
organization.
Assess the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
Establish goals and objectives, or performance targets, to direct all the activities that
you’ll perform to achieve your mission.
Develop and implement tactical and operational plans to achieve goals and
objectives.
In the next few sections, we’ll examine these components of the strategic-planning
process.
Mission Statement
As we saw in an earlier chapter, the mission statement describes the purpose of your
organization—the reason for its existence. It tells the reader what the organization is
7
committed to doing. It can be very concise, like the one from Mary Kay Inc. (the
cosmetics company): ―To enrich the lives of women around the world.‖ [2]
Or it can be as
detailed as the one from Harley-Davidson: ―We fulfill dreams inspired by the many roads
of the world by providing extraordinary motorcycles and customer experiences. We fuel
the passion for freedom in our customers to express their own individuality.‖ [3]
What about Notes-4-You? What should your mission statement say? A simple, concise
mission statement for your enterprise could be the following: ―To provide high-quality
class notes to college students.‖ On the other hand, you could prepare a more detailed
statement that explains what the company is committed to doing, who its customers are,
what its focus is, what goods or services it provides, and how it serves its customers. In
that case, your mission statement might be the following:
―Notes-4-You is committed to earning the loyalty of college students through its focus on
customer service. It provides high-quality, dependable, competitively priced class notes
that help college students master complex academic subjects.‖
Core Values
Having defined your mission, your next step is to ask, what does this organization stand
for? What values will define it? What principles should guide our actions as we build and
operate the business? In Chapter 2 "Business Ethics and Social Responsibility", we
explained that the small set of guiding principles that you identify as crucial to your
company are known as core values—fundamental beliefs about what’s important and
what is and isn’t appropriate in conducting company activities. Core values affect the
overall planning processes and operations. At Volvo, for example, three core values—
safety, quality, and environmental care—define the firm’s ―approach to product
development, design and production.‖ [4]
Core values should also guide the behavior of
every individual in the organization. Coca-Cola, for instance, reports that its stated core
values—leadership, collaboration, integrity, accountability, passion, diversity and
8
quality—tell employees exactly what behaviors are acceptable. [5]
How do companies
communicate core values to employees and hold them accountable for putting those
values into practice? They link core values to performance evaluations and
compensation.
In choosing core values for Notes-4-You, you’re determined not to fall back on some list
of the world’s most popular core values: ethics/integrity, accountability, respect for
others, and open communication. [6]
You want yours to be unique to Notes-4-You. After
some thought, you settle on teamwork, trust, and dependability. Why these three? As
you plan your business, you realize that it will need a workforce that functions as a
team, trusts each other, and can be depended on to satisfy customers. In building your
workforce, you’ll seek employees who’ll embrace these values.
Conduct a SWOT Analysis
The next step in the strategic-planning process is to assess your company’s fit with its
environment. A common approach to environmental analysis is matching the strengths
of your business with the opportunities available to it. It’s called SWOT analysis
because it calls for analyzing an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities,
and Threats. It begins with an examination of external factors that could influence the
company in either a positive or a negative way. These could include economic
conditions, competition, emerging technologies, laws and regulations, and customers’
expectations.
One purpose of assessing the external environment is to identify both opportunities that
could benefit the company and threats to its success. For example, a company that
manufactures children’s bicycle helmets would view a change in federal law requiring all
children to wear helmets as an opportunity. The news that two large sports-equipment
companies were coming out with bicycle helmets would be a threat.
9
The next step is to evaluate the company’s strengths and weaknesses. Strengths might
include a motivated workforce, state-of-the-art technology, impressive managerial
talent, or a desirable location. The opposite of any of these strengths (poor workforce,
obsolete technology, incompetent management, or poor location) could signal a
potential weakness. Armed with a good idea of external opportunities and threats, as
well as internal strengths and weaknesses, managers want to capitalize on
opportunities by taking advantage of organizational strengths. Likewise, they want to
protect the organization from both external threats and internal weaknesses.
Let’s start with our strengths. Now that we know what they are, how do we match them
with our available opportunities (while also protecting ourselves from our threats and
overcoming our weaknesses)? Here’s a possibility: By providing excellent service and
price while we’re still small (with few customers and low costs), we can solidify our
position on campus. When the market grows (as it will, because of the increase in the
number of classes—especially those at 8:00 a.m.—and increases in student
enrollment), we’ll have built a strong reputation and will put ourselves in a position to
grow. So even if a competitor comes to campus (a threat), we’ll be the preferred
supplier of class notes. This strategy will work only if we make sure that our note-takers
are dependable and that we don’t alienate the faculty or administration.
Set Goals and Objectives
Your mission statement affirms what your organization is generally committed to doing,
but it doesn’t tell you how to do it. So the next step in the strategic-planning process is
establishing goals and objectives. Goals are major accomplishments that the company
wants to achieve over a long period (say, five years). Objectives are shorter-term
performance targets that direct the activities of the organization toward the attainment of
a goal. They should be clearly stated, attainable, and measurable: they should give
target dates for the completion of tasks and stipulate who’s responsible for taking
necessary actions. [7]
10
An organization will have a number of goals and related objectives. Some will focus on
financial measures, such as profit maximization and sales growth. Others will target
operational efficiency or quality control. Still others will govern the company’s
relationships with its employees, its community, its environment, or all three.
Finally, goals and objectives change over time. As a firm reassesses its place in its
business environment, it rethinks not only its mission but also its approach to fulfilling it.
The reality of change was a major theme when the late McDonald’s CEO Jim Cantalupo
explained his goal to revitalize the company:
―The world has changed. Our customers have changed. We have to change too.
Growth comes from being better, not just expanding to have more restaurants. The new
McDonald’s is focused on building sales at existing restaurants rather than on adding
new restaurants. We are introducing a new level of discipline and efficiency to all
aspects of the business and are setting a new bar for performance.‖ [8]
This change in focus was accompanied by specific performance objectives—annual
sales growth of 3 to 5 percent and income growth of 6 to 7 percent at existing
restaurants, plus a five-point improvement (based on customer surveys) in speed of
service, friendliness, and food quality.
In setting strategic goals and performance objectives for Notes-4-You, you should keep
things simple. Because you know you need to make money to stay in business, you
could include a financial goal (and related objectives). Your mission statement promises
―high-quality, dependable, competitively priced class notes,‖ so you could focus on the
quality of the class notes that you’ll be taking and distributing. Finally, because your
mission is to serve students, one goal could be customer oriented. When all’s said and
done, your list of goals and objectives might look like this:
11
Goal 1: Achieve a 10 percent return on profits in your first five years.
o Objective: Sales of $20,000 and profit of $2,000 for the first twelve months of
operations.
Goal 2: Produce a high-quality product.
o Objective: First-year satisfaction scores of 90 percent or higher on quality of notes
(based on survey responses to three measures—understandability, readability, and
completeness).
Goal 3: Attain 98 percent customer satisfaction by the end of your fifth year.
o Objective: Making notes available within two days after class, 95 percent of the time.
Develop Tactical and Operational Plans
The planning process begins at the top of the organization, where upper-level managers
create a strategic plan, but it doesn’t end there. The execution of the strategic plan
involves managers at all levels.
Tactical Plans
The overall plan is broken down into more manageable, shorter-term components
called tactical plans. These plans specify the activities and allocation of resources
(people, equipment, money) needed to implement the overall strategic plan over a given
period. Often, a long-range strategic plan is divided into several tactical plans; a five-
year strategic plan, for instance, might be implemented as five one-year tactical plans.
Operational Plans
The tactical plan is then broken down into various operational plans that provide
detailed action steps to be taken by individuals or groups to implement the tactical plan
and, consequently, the strategic plan. Operational plans cover only a brief period—say,
a week or a month. At Notes-4-You, for example, note-takers might be instructed to turn
in typed class notes five hours earlier than normal on the last day of the semester (an
operational guideline). The goal is to improve the customer-satisfaction score on
12
dependability (a tactical goal) and, as a result, to earn the loyalty of students through
attention to customer service (a strategic goal).
Plan for Contingencies and Crises
Even with great planning, things don’t always turn out the way they’re supposed to.
Perhaps your plans were flawed, or maybe you had great plans but something in the
environment shifted unexpectedly. Successful managers anticipate and plan for the
unexpected. Dealing with uncertainty requires contingency planning and crisis
management.
Contingency Planning
With contingency planning, managers identify those aspects of the business that are
most likely to be adversely affected by change. Then, they develop alternative courses
of action in case an anticipated change does occur. You probably do your own
contingency planning: for example, if you’re planning to take in a sure-fire hit movie on
its release date, you may decide on an alternative movie in case you can’t get tickets to
your first choice.
Crisis Management
Organizations also face the risk of encountering crises that require immediate attention.
Rather than waiting until such a crisis occurs and then scrambling to figure out what to
do, many firms practice crisis management. Some, for instance, set up teams trained to
deal with emergencies. Members gather information quickly and respond to the crisis
while everyone else carries out his or her normal duties. The team also keeps the
public, the employees, the press, and government officials informed about the situation
and the company’s response to it. [9]
An example of how to handle crisis management involves Wendy’s. After learning that a
woman claimed she found a fingertip in a bowl of chili she bought at a Wendy’s
13
restaurant in San Jose, California, the company’s public relations team responded
quickly. Within a few days, the company announced that the finger didn’t come from an
employee or a supplier. Soon after, the police arrested the woman and charged her with
attempted grand larceny for lying about how the finger got in her bowl of chili and trying
to extort $2.5 million from the company. But the crisis wasn’t over for Wendy’s. The
incident was plastered all over the news as a grossed-out public sought an answer to
the question, ―Whose finger is (or was) it?‖ A $100,000 reward was offered by Wendy’s
to anyone with information that would help the police answer this question. The
challenge Wendy’s faced was how to entice customers to return to its fifty San
Francisco–area restaurants (where sales had plummeted) while keeping a low profile
nationally. It accomplished this by giving out free milkshakes and discount coupons to
customers in the affected regions and, to avoid calling attention to the missing finger, by
making no changes in its national advertising. The crisis-management strategy worked
and the story died down (though it flared up temporarily when the police arrested the
woman’s husband, who allegedly bought the finger from a coworker who had severed it
in an accident months earlier). [10]
Even with crisis-management plans in place, however, it’s unlikely that most companies
will emerge from a damaging or potentially damaging episode as unscathed as Wendy’s
did. For one thing, the culprits in the Wendy’s case were caught, and the public is willing
to forgive an organization it views as a victim. Given the current public distrust of
corporate behavior, however, companies whose reputations have suffered due to
questionable corporate judgment don’t fare as well. These companies include the
international oil company, BP, whose CEO, Tony Hayward, did a disastrous job
handling the crisis created when a BP controlled oil rig exploded in the Gulf Coast killing
eleven workers and creating the largest oil spill in U.S. history. Hayward’s lack of
sensitivity will be remembered forever; particularly his response to a reporter’s question
on what he would tell those whose livelihoods were ruined: ―We’re sorry for the massive
disruption it’s caused their lives. There’s no one who wants this over more than I do. I
14
would like my life back.‖ His comment was obviously upsetting to the families of the
eleven men who lost their lives on the rig and had no way to get their lives back. [11]
Then, there are the companies at which executives have crossed the line between the
unethical to the downright illegal—Arthur Andersen, Enron, and Bernard L. Madoff
Investment Securities, to name just a few. Given the high risk associated with a crisis, it
should come as no surprise that contemporary managers spend more time anticipating
crises and practicing their crisis-management responses.
K E Y T A K E A W A Y S
Successful managers decide where they want the organization to go and then determine how to get there.
Planning for a business starts at the top and works its way down.
It begins with strategic planning—the process of establishing an overall course of action.
Step one is identifying the purpose of the organization.
Then, management is ready to take the remaining steps in the strategic planning process:
1. Prepare a mission statement that describes the purpose of the organization and tells customers, employees, and others what it’s committed to doing.
2. Select the core values that will guide the behavior of members of the organization by letting them know what is and isn’t appropriate and important in conducting company activities.
3. Use SWOT analysis to assess the company’s strengths and weaknesses and its fit with the external environment.
4. Set goals and objectives, or performance targets, to direct all the activities needed to achieve the organization’s mission.
5. Develop tactical plans and operational plans to implement objectives.
E X E R C I S E S
(AACSB) Reflective Skills
15
Without a plan, it’s hard to succeed. Successful managers set goals and determine the
best ways to reach them. Successful students do the same thing. Develop a strategic
plan for succeeding in this course that includes the following steps:
1. Assess your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as they relate to this course.
2. Establish goals and objectives, or performance targets, to direct all the activities that you’ll perform to earn a high grade in this course.
3. Describe tactical and operational plans for achieving your stated goals and objectives.
(AACSB) Analysis
If you were the CEO of a large organization, what core values would you want to guide the behavior of your employees? First, assume that you oversee a large company that manufactures and sells medical devices, such as pacemakers, defibrillators, and insulin pumps. Your company was a pioneer in bringing these products to the market. Identify six core values that you would want to guide the behavior of your employees. For each core value, be sure to do the following:
o Indicate why it’s important to the functioning of the organization.
o Explain how you’ll communicate it to your employees and encourage them to embrace it.
o Outline the approaches that you’ll take in holding employees accountable for embracing it.
Now, repeat the process. This time, however, assume that you’re the CEO of a company that rents movies and games at more than eight thousand outlets across the country.
[1] Lee Scott, ―Three Basic Beliefs,‖ About Wal- Mart,http://www.walmartstores.com/GlobalWMStoresWeb/navigate.do?catg=252 (accessed May 3, 2006). [2] Mary Kay Inc. Web site, Employment at Mary Kay section,http://www.marykay.com/company/jobsatmarykay/default.aspx (accessed September 21, 2011). [3] Harley-Davidson Web site, Company/Student Center section, http://www.harley- davidson.com/en_GB/Content/Pages/Company/company.html?locale=en_GB&bmLocale=enGB (access ed September 21, 2011). [4] Volvo Group Global, http://www.volvogroup.com/group/global/en- gb/volvo%20group/our_brand/volvo/Pages/volvo.aspx (accessed September 21, 2011). [5] The Coca-Cola Company, ―Code of Business Conduct,‖ http://www.thecoca- colacompany.com/ourcompany/mission_vision_values.html (accessed September 21, 2011).
16
[6] ―Most Executives Say Ethics, Integrity Are Among Core Corporate Values,‖ allBusiness,http://www.allbusiness.com/reports-reviews-sections/polls-surveys/11427605- 1.html(accessed October 9, 2011). [7] Scott Safranski and Ik-Whan Kwon, ―Strategic Planning for the Growing Business‖ (1991), U.S. Small Business Administration,http://www.sbaonline.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/serv_pubs_eb _pdf_eb6.pdf (accessed October 9, 2011). [8] McDonald’s Corp., ―McDonald’s Announces Plans to Revitalize Its Worldwide Business and Sets New Financial Targets,‖ Franchise Bison,http://www.bison.com/press_mcdonalds_04072003 (accessed October 8, 2011). [9] Brian Perkins, ―Defining Crisis Management,‖ Wharton Alumni Magazine, Summer 2000, http://whartonmagazine.com/issues/summer-2000/reunion-2000/ (accessed October 8, 2011). [10] Stewart Elliott, ―Wendy’s Gets a Break, but Still Has Work Ahead of It,‖ The New York Times, April 29, 2005,http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/29/business/media/29adco.html?ei=5088&en=bb0e017145269f5e & (accessed October 8, 2011). [11] ―Embattled BP Chief: I Want My Life Back,‖ The Times of London, May 31, 2010.
6.3 Organizing
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Discuss various options for organizing a business, and create an organization chart.
Now that you’ve developed a strategic plan for Notes-4-You, you need to organize your
company so that it can implement your plan. A manager engaged in organizing
allocates resources (people, equipment, and money) to achieve a company’s plans.
Successful managers make sure that all the activities identified in the planning process
are assigned to some person, department, or team and that everyone has the resources
needed to perform assigned activities.
Levels of Management: How Managers Are Organized
17
A typical organization has several layers of management. Think of these layers as
forming a pyramid like the one in Figure 6.3 "Levels of Management", with top
managers occupying the narrow space at the peak, first-line managers the broad base,
and middle-managers the levels in between. As you move up the pyramid, management
positions get more demanding, but they carry more authority and responsibility (along
with more power, prestige, and pay). Top managers spend most of their time in planning
and decision making, while first-line managers focus on day-to-day operations. For
obvious reasons, there are far more people with positions at the base of the pyramid
than there are with jobs at the other two levels (as you get to the top, there are only a
few positions). Let’s look at each management level in more detail.
Figure 6.3 Levels of Management
Top Managers
Top managers are responsible for the health and performance of the organization. They
set the objectives, or performance targets, designed to direct all the activities that must
be performed if the company is going to fulfill its mission. Top-level executives routinely
18
scan the external environment for opportunities and threats, and they redirect company
efforts when needed. They spend a considerable portion of their time planning and
making major decisions. They represent the company in important dealings with other
businesses and government agencies, and they promote it to the public. Job titles at
this level typically include chief executive officer (CEO), chief financial officer (CFO),
chief operating officer (COO), president, and vice president.
Middle Managers
As the name implies, middle managers are in the ―middle‖ of the management
hierarchy: They report to top management and oversee the activities of first-line
managers. They’re responsible for developing and implementing activities and
allocating the resources needed to achieve the objectives set by top management.
Common job titles include operations manager, division manager, plant manager,
and branch manager.
First-Line Managers
First-line managers supervise employees and coordinate their activities to make sure
that the work performed throughout the company is consistent with the plans of both top
and middle management. They’re less involved in planning than higher-level managers
and more involved in day-to-day operations. It’s at this level that most people acquire
their first managerial experience. The job titles vary considerably but include such
designations as department head, group leader, office manager, foreman,
and supervisor.
Let’s take a quick survey of the management hierarchy at Notes-4-You. As president,
you are, of course, a member of top management, and you’re responsible for the overall
performance of your company. You spend much of your time setting objectives, or
performance targets, to ensure that the company meets the goals you’ve set for it—
increased sales, higher-quality notes, and timely distribution.
19
Several middle managers report to you, including your operations manager. As a middle
manager, this individual focuses on implementing two of your objectives: producing
high-quality notes and distributing them to customers in a timely manner. To accomplish
this task, the operations manager oversees the work of two first-line managers—the
note-taking supervisor and the copying supervisor. Each first-line manager supervises
several non-managerial employees to make sure that their work is consistent with the
plans devised by top and middle management.
Organizational Structure: How Companies Get the Job Done
The organizing process raises some important questions: What jobs need to be done?
Who does what? Who reports to whom? What are the formal relationships among
people in the organization? You provide answers to these questions by developing
an organizational structure: an arrangement of positions that’s most appropriate for your
company at a specific point in time. Remember, given the rapidly changing environment
in which businesses operate, a structure that works today might be outdated tomorrow.
That’s why you hear so often about companies restructuring—altering existing
organizational structures to become more competitive under conditions that have
changed. In building an organizational structure, you engage in two activities: job
specialization(dividing tasks into jobs) and departmentalization (grouping jobs into
units). We’ll now see how these two processes are accomplished.
Specialization
The first step in designing an organizational structure is twofold:
1. Identifying the activities that need to be performed in order to achieve organizational
goals.
2. Breaking down these activities into tasks that can be performed by individuals or
groups of employees.
20
This twofold process of organizing activities into clusters of related tasks that can be
handled by certain individuals or groups is called specialization. Its purpose is to
improve efficiency.
Would specialization make Notes-4-You more efficient? You could have each employee
perform all tasks entailed by taking and selling notes. Each employee could take notes
in an assigned class, type them up, get them copied, and sell them outside the
classroom at the start of the next class meeting. The same person would keep track of
all sales and copying costs and give any profit—sales minus copying costs minus
compensation—to you. The process seems simple, but is it really efficient? Will you
earn the maximum amount of profit? Probably not. Even a company as small as Notes-
4-You can benefit from specialization. It would function more efficiently if some
employees specialized in taking notes, others in copying and packaging them, and still
others in selling them. Higher-level employees could focus on advertising, accounting,
finance, and human resources.
Obviously, specialization has advantages. In addition to increasing efficiency, for
example, it results in jobs that are easier to learn. But it has disadvantages, too. Doing
the same thing over and over bores people and will eventually leave employees
dissatisfied with their jobs. Before long, you’ll notice decreased performance and
increased absenteeism and turnover.
Departmentalization
The next step in designing an organizational structure is departmentalization—grouping
specialized jobs into meaningful units. Depending on the organization and the size of
the work units, they may be called divisions, departments, or just plain groups.
Traditional groupings of jobs result in different organizational structures, and for the
sake of simplicity, we’ll focus on two types—functional and divisional organizations.
21
Functional Organization
A functional organization groups together people who have comparable skills and
perform similar tasks. This form of organization is fairly typical for small to medium-size
companies, which group their people by business functions: accountants are grouped
together, as are people in finance, marketing and sales, human resources, production,
and research and development. Each unit is headed by an individual with expertise in
the unit’s particular function. The head of an accounting department, for example, will
be a senior accountant; the head of a hospital nursing unit will obviously be an
experienced nurse. This structure is also appropriate for nonprofits. Think about your
school, for instance: mathematics teachers are in the math department, history teachers
are in the history department, those who run athletic programs are in the athletic
department, and librarians work at the library.
If Notes-4-You adopted a functional approach to departmentalization, jobs might be
grouped into four clusters:
Human resources (hiring, training, and evaluating employees)
Operations (overseeing notetakers and copiers)
Marketing (arranging for advertising, sales, and distribution)
Accounting (handling cash collection and disbursement)
There are a number of advantages to the functional approach. The structure is simple to
understand and enables the staff to specialize in particular areas; everyone in the
marketing group would probably have similar interests and expertise. But homogeneity
also has drawbacks: it can hinder communication and decision making between units
and even promote interdepartmental conflict. The marketing department, for example,
might butt heads with the accounting department because marketers want to spend as
much as possible on advertising, while accountants want to control costs. Marketers
22
might feel that accountants are too tight with funds, and accountants might regard
marketers as spendthrifts.
Divisional Organization
Large companies often find it unruly to operate as one large unit under a functional
organizational structure. Sheer size makes it difficult for managers to oversee
operations and serve customers. To rectify this problem, most large companies are
structured as divisional organizations made up of several smaller, self-contained units,
or divisions, which are accountable for their own performance. Each division functions
autonomously because it contains all the functional expertise (production, marketing,
accounting, finance, human resources) needed to meet its objectives. The challenge is
to find the most appropriate way of structuring operations to achieve overall company
goals. Toward this end, divisions can be formed according to products, customers,
processes, or geography.
Product Division
Product division means that a company is structured according to its product lines.
General Motors, for example, has four product-based divisions: Buick, Cadillac,
Chevrolet, and GMC. [1]
Each division has its own research and development group, its
own manufacturing operations, and its own marketing team. This allows individuals in
the division to focus all their efforts on the products produced by their division. A
downside is that it results in higher costs as corporate support services (such as
accounting and human resources) are duplicated in each of the four divisions.
Customer Division
Some companies prefer a customer division structure because it enables them to better
serve their various categories of customers. Thus, Johnson & Johnson’s two hundred or
so operating companies are grouped into three customer-based business segments:
consumer business (personal-care and hygiene products sold to the general public),
23
pharmaceuticals (prescription drugs sold to pharmacists), and professional business
(medical devices and diagnostics products used by physicians, optometrists, hospitals,
laboratories, and clinics). [2]
Process Division
If goods move through several steps during production, a company might opt for
a process division structure. This form works well at Bowater Thunder Bay, a Canadian
company that harvests trees and processes wood into newsprint and pulp. The first step
in the production process is harvesting and stripping trees. Then, large logs are sold to
lumber mills and smaller logs chopped up and sent to Bowater’s mills. At the mill, wood
chips are chemically converted into pulp. About 90 percent is sold to other
manufacturers (as raw material for home and office products), and the remaining 10
percent is further processed into newspaper print. Bowater, then, has three divisions:
tree cutting, chemical processing, and finishing (which makes newsprint). [3]
Geographical Division
Geographical division enables companies that operate in several locations to be
responsive to customers at a local level. McDonald’s, for example, is organized
according to the regions of the world in which it operates. In the United States, the
national unit is further subdivided into three geographic operating divisions: east, west
and central. [4]
(This approach might be appealing to Notes-4-You if it expands to serve
schools around the country.)
There are pluses and minuses associated with divisional organization. On the one hand,
divisional structure usually enhances the ability to respond to changes in a firm’s
environment. If, on the other hand, services must be duplicated across units, costs will
be higher. In addition, some companies have found that units tend to focus on their own
needs and goals at the expense of the organization as a whole.
The Organization Chart
24
Once an organization has set its structure, it can represent that structure in an
organization chart: a diagram delineating the interrelationships of positions within the
organization. Having decided that Notes-4-You will adopt a functional structure, you
might create the organization chart shown in Figure 6.5 "Organization Chart for Notes-4-
You".
Figure 6.5 Organization Chart for Notes-4-You
Begin by putting yourself at the top of the chart, as the company’s president. Then fill in
the level directly below your name with the names and positions of the people who work
directly for you—your accounting, marketing, operations, and human resources
managers. The next level identifies the people who work for these managers. Because
you’ve started out small, neither your accounting manager nor your human resources
manager will be currently managing anyone directly. Your marketing manager, however,
25
will oversee one person in advertising and a sales supervisor (who, in turn, oversees
the sales staff). Your operations manager will oversee two individuals—one to supervise
note-takers and one to supervise the people responsible for making copies.
Reporting Relationships
With these relationships in mind, you can now draw lines to denote
reporting relationships, or patterns of formal communication. Because four managers
report to you, you’ll be connected to four positions; that is, you’ll have four direct
―reports.‖ Your marketing and operations managers will each be connected to two
positions and their supervisors to one position each. The organization chart shows that
if a member of the sales staff has a problem, he or she will report it to the sales
supervisor. If the sales supervisor believes that the problem should be addressed at a
higher level, then he or she will report it to the marketing manager.
Theoretically, you will communicate only with your four direct reports, but this isn’t the
way things normally work. Behind every formal communication network there lies a
network of informal communications—unofficial relationships among members of an
organization. You might find that over time, you receive communications directly from
members of the sales staff; in fact, you might encourage this line of communication.
Now let’s look at the chart of an organization that relies on a divisional structure based
on goods or services produced—say, a theme park. The top layers of this company’s
organization chart might look like the one in Figure 6.6 "Organization Charts for
Divisional Structures"(a). We see that the president has two direct reports—a vice
president in charge of rides and a vice president in charge of concessions. What about
a bank that’s structured according to its customer base? The bank’s organization chart
would begin like the one in Figure 6.6 "Organization Charts for Divisional Structures"(b).
Once again, the company’s top manager has two direct reports, in this case a VP of
retail-customer accounts and a VP of commercial-customer accounts.
26
Figure 6.6 Organization Charts for Divisional Structures
Over time, companies revise their organizational structures to accommodate growth and
changes in the external environment. It’s not uncommon, for example, for a firm to
adopt a functional structure in its early years. Then, as it becomes bigger and more
complex, it might move to a divisional structure—perhaps to accommodate new
products or to become more responsive to certain customers or geographical areas.
Some companies might ultimately rely on a combination of functional and divisional
structures. This could be a good approach for a credit card company that issues cards
in both the United States and Europe. A skeleton of this firm’s organization chart might
look like the one in Figure.
Figure 6.7 Organization Chart: Combination Divisional and Functional Structures
27
Lines of Authority
You can learn a lot about a firm’s reporting and authority relationships by looking at its
organization chart. To whom does a particular person report? Does each person report
to one or more supervisors? How many people does a manager supervise? How many
layers are there, for example, between the top managerial position and the lowest
managerial level?
Chain of Command
The vertical connecting lines in the organization chart show the firm’s
chain of command: the authority relationships among people working at different levels
of the organization. That is to say, they show who reports to whom. When you’re
examining an organization chart, you’ll probably want to know whether each person
reports to one or more supervisors: to what extent, in other words, is there unity of
command? To understand why unity of command is an important organizational feature,
think about it from a personal standpoint. Would you want to report to more than one
boss? What happens if you get conflicting directions? Whose directions would you
follow?
28
There are, however, conditions under which an organization and its employees can
benefit by violating the unity-of-command principle. Under a matrix structure, for
example, employees from various functional areas (product design, manufacturing,
finance, marketing, human resources, etc.) form teams to combine their skills in working
on a specific project or product. This matrix organization chart might look like the one in
the following figure.
Figure 6.8 Organization Chart: Matrix Structure
Nike sometimes uses this type of arrangement. To design new products, the company
may create product teams made up of designers, marketers, and other specialists with
29
expertise in particular sports categories—say, running shoes or basketball shoes. Each
team member would be evaluated by both the team manager and the head of his or her
functional department.
Span of Control
Another thing to notice about a firm’s chain of command is the number of layers
between the top managerial position and the lowest managerial level. As a rule, new
organizations (such as Notes-4-You) have only a few layers of management—an
organizational structure that’s often called flat. Let’s say, for instance, that a member of
the Notes-4-You sales staff wanted to express concern about slow sales among a
certain group of students. That person’s message would have to filter upward through
only two management layers—the sales supervisor and the marketing manager—before
reaching the president.
As a company grows, however, it tends to add more layers between the top and the
bottom; that is, it gets taller. Added layers of management can slow down
communication and decision making, causing the organization to become less efficient
and productive. That’s one reason why many of today’s organizations are restructuring
to become flatter.
There are trade-offs between the advantages and disadvantages of flat and tall
organizations. Companies determine which trade-offs to make according to a principle
called span of control, which measures the number of people reporting to a particular
manager. If, for example, you remove layers of management to make your organization
flatter, you end up increasing the number of positions reporting to a particular
supervisor. If you refer back to the organization chart in Figure 6.5 "Organization Chart
for Notes-4-You", you’ll recall that, under your present structure, four managers report to
you as the president of Notes-4-You: the heads of accounting, marketing, operations,
and human resources. In turn, two of these managers have positions reporting to them:
30
the advertising manager and sales supervisor report to the marketing manager, while
the notetaker’s supervisor and the copier’s supervisor report to the operations manager.
Let’s say that you remove a layer of management by getting rid of the marketing and
operations managers. Your organization would be flatter, but what would happen to
your workload? As president, you’d now have six direct reports rather than four:
accounting manager, advertising manager, sales manager, notetaker supervisor, copier
supervisor, and human resources manager.
What’s better—a narrow span of control (with few direct reports) or a wide span of
control (with many direct reports)? The answer to this question depends on a number of
factors, including frequency and type of interaction, proximity of subordinates,
competence of both supervisor and subordinates, and the nature of the work being
supervised. For example, you’d expect a much wider span of control at a nonprofit call
center than in a hospital emergency room.
Delegating Authority
Given the tendency toward flatter organizations and wider spans of control, how do
managers handle increased workloads? They must learn how to handle delegation—the
process of entrusting work to subordinates. Unfortunately, many managers are reluctant
to delegate. As a result, they not only overburden themselves with tasks that could be
handled by others, but they also deny subordinates the opportunity to learn and develop
new skills.
Responsibility and Authority
As owner of Notes-4-You, you’ll probably want to control every aspect of your business,
especially during the start-up stage. But as the organization grows, you’ll have to assign
responsibility for performing certain tasks to other people. You’ll also have to accept the
fact that responsibility alone—the duty to perform a task—won’t be enough to get the
job done. You’ll need to grant subordinates the authority they require to complete a
31
task—that is, the power to make the necessary decisions. (And they’ll also need
sufficient resources.) Ultimately, you’ll also hold your subordinates accountable for their
performance.
Centralization and Decentralization
If and when your company expands (say, by offering note-taking services at other
schools), you’ll have to decide whether most decisions should still be made by
individuals at the top or delegated to lower-level employees. The first option, in which
most decision making is concentrated at the top, is called centralization. The second
option, which spreads decision making throughout the organization, is
called decentralization.
Let’s say that you favor decentralizing Notes-4-You some four or five years down the
road, when the company has expanded. Naturally, there are some decisions—such as
strategic planning—that you won’t delegate to lower-level employees, but you could
certainly delegate the management of copy-center operations. In fact, putting someone
in charge of this function would probably improve customer satisfaction, because copy-
center customers would be dealing directly with the manager. It would also give the
manager valuable decision-making experience, and while he or she is busy making
daily decisions about the copy center, you’ll have more time to work on higher-level
tasks. The more you think about the possibility of decentralizing your company, the
more you like the idea. First, though, you have to see it through its difficult start-up
years.
K E Y T A K E A W A Y S
Managers coordinate the activities identified in the planning process among individuals, departments, or other units and allocate the resources needed to perform them.
Typically, there are three levels of management: top managers, who are responsible for overall performance; middle managers, who report to top managers
32
and oversee lower-level managers; and first-line managers, who supervise employees to make sure that work is performed correctly and on time.
Management must develop an organizational structure, or arrangement of people within the organization, that will best achieve company goals.
The process begins with specialization—dividing necessary tasks into jobs; the principle of grouping jobs into units is called departmentalization.
Units are then grouped into an appropriate organizational structure. Functional organization groups people with comparable skills and tasks; divisional organization creates a structure composed of self-contained units based on product, customer, process, or geographical division. Forms of organizational division are often combined.
An organization’s structure is represented in an organization chart—a diagram showing the interrelationships of its positions.
This chart highlights the chain of command, or authority relationships among people working at different levels.
It also shows the number of layers between the top and lowest managerial levels. An organization with few layers has a wide span of control, with each manager overseeing a large number of subordinates; with a narrow span of control, only a limited number of subordinates reports to each manager.
E X E R C I S E S
(AACSB) Analysis
Define organizational structure and identify five different forms that it can take. For each form, identify a type of company that might use it and explain why it would be appropriate for the company. Use examples other than those mentioned in the chapter.
(AACSB) Analysis
How would you like to work at the ―Sweetest Place on Earth‖? Then, consider a career at Hershey Foods, the chocolate and candy maker. Your career path at Hershey Foods might follow a typical path: When you finish college, you may enter the business world as a first-line manager. After about ten years, you will probably have advanced to the middle-management level. Perhaps you’ll keep moving up and eventually find yourself in a top-level management position with a big salary. Examining job opportunities may be an opportunity to start identifying the kinds of positions that interest you. Go to http://www.hersheys.com to link to the Hershey Foods Web site, click on ―careers‖ at
33
the bottom of the home page, and check out available positions. Then, take the following steps:
o Find an interesting entry-level management position. Describe the duties of the job and explain why you’d classify it as a first-line management position.
o Pick a middle-level position to which you might advance after ten years with the company. Describe the duties of the job and explain why you’d classify it as a middle-level management position.
o Finally, identify a top-level management position that you’d like to attain later in your career. To find these positions, you’ll have to click on ―Investors,‖ ―Corporate Governance,‖ and ―Management Team.‖ Because Hershey Foods doesn’t describe its management-team positions, you’ll have to fill in a few blanks. Start by listing what you imagine to be the duties of a given position; then, explain why these duties qualify it as a top-level management position.
1] Associated Press, ―General Motors Rebuilds with 4 Divisions,‖ The Augusta Chronicle, October 7, 2010, http://chronicle.augusta.com/life/autos/2010-10-07/general-motors-rebuilds-4-divisions (accessed October 8, 2011). [2] Johnson & Johnson Services, ―Business Segments,‖ http://www.jnj.com/connect/about-jnj/company- structure (accessed October 8, 2011). [3] Northwest Forest Industry, Pulp and Paper Manufacturing, ―From the Forest to the Office and Home: Bowater—A Case Study in Newsprint and Kraft Pulp Production,‖Borealforest.org, http://www.borealforest.org/paper/index.htm (accessed October 8, 2011). [4] ―Franchising,‖ McDonald’s Corp.,http://www.aboutmcdonalds.com/mcd/franchising/us_franchising/franchise_contacts.html (accessed October 8, 2011).
6.4 Directing
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Explain how managers direct others and motivate them to achieve company goals.
34
The third management function is directing—providing focus and direction to others and
motivating them to achieve organizational goals. As owner and president of Notes-4-
You, you might think of yourself as an orchestra leader. You have given your musicians
(employees) their sheet music (plans). You’ve placed them in sections (departments)
and arranged the sections (organizational structure) so the music will sound as good as
possible. Now your job is to tap your baton and lead the orchestra so that its members
make beautiful music together. [1]
Leadership Styles
Actually, it’s fairly easy to pick up a baton, cue each section, and strike up the band. But
it doesn’t follow that the music will sound good. What if your cues are ignored or
misinterpreted or ambiguous? Maybe your musicians don’t like your approach to making
music and will just walk away. On top of everything else, you don’t simply want to make
music: you want to inspire your musicians to make great music. How do you accomplish
this goal? How do you become an effective leader? What style, or approach, should you
use to motivate others to achieve organizational goals?
Unfortunately, there are no definitive answers to questions like these. Over time, every
manager refines his or her own leadership style, or way of interacting with and
influencing others. Despite a vast range of personal differences, leadership styles tend
to reflect one of the following approaches to directing and motivating people:
the autocratic, the democratic, or the laissez-faire. Let’s see how managerial styles
reflect each of them in a work situation.
Autocratic style. Managers who have developed an autocratic leadership style tend
to make decisions without soliciting input from subordinates. They exercise authority
and expect subordinates to take responsibility for performing the required tasks
without undue explanation.
Democratic style. Managers who favor a democratic leadership style generally seek
input from subordinates while retaining the authority to make the final decisions.
35
They’re also more likely to keep subordinates informed about things that affect their
work.
Laissez-faire style. In practicing a laissez-faire leadership style, managers adopt a
―hands-off‖ approach and provide relatively little direction to subordinates. They may
advise employees but usually give them considerable freedom to solve problems
and make decisions on their own.
At first glance, you’d probably not want to work for an autocratic leader. After all, you
certainly don’t want to be told what to do without having any input. You probably like the
idea of working for a democratic leader; it’s flattering to be asked for your input. Though
working in a laissez-faire environment might seem a little unsettling at first, the
opportunity to make your own decisions is appealing.
In general, your assessments of the three leadership styles would be accurate.
Employees generally dislike working for autocratic leaders; they like working for
democratic leaders, and they find working for laissez-faire leaders rewarding (as long as
they feel they can handle the job). But there are situations when these generalities don’t
hold.
To learn what these situations are, let’s turn things around and pretend you’re the
leader. To make it applicable to your current life, we’ll say that you’re leading a group of
fellow students in a team project for your class. Are there times when it would be best
for you to use an autocratic leadership style? What if your team was newly formed,
unfamiliar with what needs to be done, under a tight deadline, and looking to you for
direction? In this situation, you might find it appropriate to follow an autocratic
leadership style (on a temporary basis) and assign tasks to each member of the group.
Now let’s look at the leadership style you probably prefer—the democratic leadership
style. Can you think of a situation where this style would not work for your team? What if
the members of your team are unmotivated, don’t seem interested in providing input,
36
and aren’t getting along? It might make sense to move away from a democratic style of
leadership (temporarily) and delegate specific tasks to each member of the group that
they can do on their own.
How about laissez-faire leadership? Will this always work with your group? Not always.
It will work if your team members are willing and able to work independently and
welcome the chance to make decisions. Otherwise, it could cause the team to miss
deadlines or do poorly on the project.
The point being made here is that no one leadership style is effective all the time for all
people. While the democratic style is viewed as the most appropriate (as is the laissez-
faire style, to a lesser extent), there are times when following an autocratic style is
better. Good leaders learn how to adjust their styles to fit both the situation and the
individuals being directed.
Transformational Leadership
Theories on what constitutes effective leadership evolve over time. One theory that has
received a lot of attention in the last decade contrasts two leadership
styles: transactional and transformational. So-called transactional leaders exercise
authority based on their rank in the organization. They let subordinates know what’s
expected of them and what they will receive if they meet stated objectives. They focus
their attention on identifying mistakes and disciplining employees for poor performance.
By contrast, transformational leaders mentor and develop subordinates, providing them
with challenging opportunities, working one-on-one to help them meet their professional
and personal needs, and encouraging people to approach problems from new
perspectives. They stimulate employees to look beyond personal interests to those of
the group.
So, which leadership style is more effective? You probably won’t be surprised by the
opinion of most experts. In today’s organizations, in which team building and information
37
sharing are important and projects are often collaborative in nature, transformational
leadership has proven to be more effective. Modern organizations look for managers
who can develop positive relationships with subordinates and motivate employees to
focus on the interests of the organization. [2]
K E Y T A K E A W A Y S
A manager’s leadership style varies depending on the manager, the situation, and the people being directed. There are three common styles.
Using an autocratic style, a manager tends to make decisions without soliciting input and expects subordinates to follow instructions without undue explanation.
Managers who prefer a democratic style seek input into decisions.
Exercising a laissez-faire style, the manager provides no more guidance than necessary and lets subordinates make decisions and solve problems.
One current leadership theory focuses on two contrasting leadership styles: transactional and transformational.
Managers adopting a transactional style exercise authority according to their rank in the organization, let subordinates know what’s expected of them, and step in when mistakes are made.
Practicing a transformational style, managers mentor and develop subordinates and motivate them to achieve organizational rather than merely personal goals. Transformational leadership is effective in organizations that value team building and information sharing.
E X E R C I S E
(AACSB) Analysis
Compare and contrast three forms of leadership—democratic, autocratic, and laissez- faire. Which style would you prefer to use yourself? Which would you prefer your boss to use? Explain your answers in both cases. Next, compare and contrast the transactional-leadership style with the transformational-leadership style? Which style would you adopt as a manager, and why?
38
[1] F. John Reh, ―Management 101,‖ About Management,http://management.about.com/cs/generalmanagement/a/Management101.htm (accessed October 8, 2011). [2] See Karen Collins, Accountants’ Management Styles and Effectiveness (American Woman’s Society of Certified Public Accountants, 1997).
6.5 Controlling
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Describe the process by which a manager monitors operations and assesses performance.
Let’s pause for a minute and reflect on the management functions that we’ve discussed
so far—planning, organizing, and directing. As founder of Notes-4-You, you began by
establishing plans for your new company. You defined its mission and set objectives, or
performance targets, which you needed to meet in order to achieve your mission. Then,
you organized your company by allocating the people and resources required to carry
out your plans. Finally, you provided focus and direction to your employees and
motivated them to achieve organizational objectives. Is your job finished? Can you take
a well-earned vacation? Unfortunately, the answer is no: your work has just begun. Now
that things are rolling along, you need to monitor your operations to see whether
everything is going according to plan. If it’s not, you’ll need to take corrective action.
This process of comparing actual to planned performance and taking necessary
corrective action is called controlling.
A Five-Step Control Process
You can think of the control function as the five-step process outlined in Figure 6.10
"Five-Step Control Process".
39
Figure 6.10 Five-Step Control Process
Let’s see how this process might work at Notes-4-You. Let’s assume that, after
evaluating class enrollments, you estimate that you can sell one hundred notes
packages per month to students taking the sophomore-level geology course popularly
known as ―Rocks for Jocks.‖ So you set your standard at a hundred units. At the end of
the month, however, you look over your records and find that you sold only eighty.
Comparing your actual performance with your planned performance, you realize that
you came up twenty packages short. In talking with your salespeople, you learn why: it
turns out that the copy machine broke down so often that packages frequently weren’t
ready on time. You immediately take corrective action by increasing maintenance on the
copy machine.
40
Now, let’s try a slightly different scenario. Let’s say that you still have the same standard
(one hundred packages) and that actual sales are still eighty packages. In investigating
the reason for the shortfall, you find that you overestimated the number of students
taking ―Rocks for Jocks.‖ Calculating a more accurate number of students, you see that
your original standard—estimated sales—was too high by twenty packages. In this
case, you should adjust your standards to reflect expected sales of eighty packages.
In both situations, your control process has been helpful. In the first instance, you were
alerted to a problem that cut into your sales. Correcting this problem would undoubtedly
increase sales and, therefore, profits. In the second case, you encountered a defect in
your planning and learned a good managerial lesson: plan more carefully.
K E Y T A K E A W A Y
The process of comparing actual to planned performance and taking corrective action is called controlling. The control function can be viewed as a five-step process: (1) establish standards, (2) measure performance, (3) compare actual performance with standards and identify any deviations, (4) determine the reason for deviations, and (5) take corrective action if needed.
E X E R C I S E
(AACSB) Analysis
Have you ever gone to an ice cream stand and noticed that the ―double dipper‖ ice cream cone the customer beside you bought has a lot more ice cream than does your ―double dipper?‖ If you were the supervisor of the ice cream stand, how would you ensure that all cones received the same amount of ice cream? What if, instead of being the supervisor of the ice cream stand, you are the manager of a professional baseball team? How would you apply the five-step control process to your job as manager?
6.6 Managerial Skills
41
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E
1. Describe the skills needed to be a successful manager.
To be a successful manager, you’ll have to master a number of skills. To get an entry-
level position, you’ll have to be technically competent at the tasks you’re asked to
perform. To advance, you’ll need to develop strong interpersonal and conceptual skills.
The relative importance of different skills varies from job to job and organization to
organization, but to some extent, you’ll need them all to forge a managerial career.
Throughout your career, you’ll also be expected to communicate ideas clearly, use your
time efficiently, and reach sound decisions.
Technical Skills
You’ll probably be hired for your first job based on your technical skills—the ones you
need to perform specific tasks—and you’ll use them extensively during your early
career. If your college major is accounting, you’ll use what you’ve learned to prepare
financial statements. If you have a marketing degree and you join an ad agency, you’ll
use what you know about promotion to prepare ad campaigns. Technical skills will
come in handy when you move up to a first-line managerial job and oversee the task
performance of subordinates. Technical skills, though developed through job training
and work experience, are generally acquired during the course of your formal education.
Interpersonal Skills
As you move up the corporate ladder, you’ll find that you can’t do everything yourself:
you’ll have to rely on other people to help you achieve the goals for which you’re
responsible. That’s why interpersonal skills—the ability to get along with and motivate
other people—are critical for managers in mid-level positions. These managers play a
pivotal role because they report to top-level managers while overseeing the activities of
first-line managers. Thus, they need strong working relationships with individuals at all
42
levels and in all areas. More than most other managers, they must use ―people skills‖ to
foster teamwork, build trust, manage conflict, and encourage improvement. [1]
Conceptual Skills
Managers at the top, who are responsible for deciding what’s good for the organization
from the broadest perspective, rely on conceptual skills—the ability to reason abstractly
and analyze complex situations. Senior executives are often called on to ―think outside
the box‖—to arrive at creative solutions to complex, sometimes ambiguous problems.
They need both strong analytical abilities and strong creative talents.
Communication Skills
Effective communication skills are crucial to just about everyone. At all levels of an
organization, you’ll often be judged on your ability to communicate, both orally and in
writing. Whether you’re talking informally or making a formal presentation, you must
express yourself clearly and concisely. Talking too loudly, rambling, and using poor
grammar reduce your ability to influence others, as does poor written communication.
Confusing and error-riddled documents (including e-mails) don’t do your message any
good, and they will reflect poorly on you. [2]
Time-Management Skills
Managers face multiple demands on their time, and their days are usually filled with
interruptions. Ironically, some technologies that were supposed to save time, such as
voicemail and e-mail, have actually increased workloads. Unless you develop
certain time-management skills, you risk reaching the end of the day feeling that you’ve
worked a lot but accomplished little. What can managers do to ease the burden? Here
are a few common-sense suggestions:
Prioritize tasks, focusing on the most important things first.
Set aside a certain time each day to return phone calls and answer e-mail.
Delegate routine tasks.
43
Don’t procrastinate.
Insist that meetings start and end on time, and stick to an agenda.
Eliminate unnecessary paperwork. [3]
Decision-Making Skills
Every manager is expected to make decisions, whether alone or as part of a team.
Drawing on your decision-making skills is often a process in which you must define a
problem, analyze possible solutions, and select the best outcome. As luck would have
it, because the same process is good for making personal decisions, we’ll use a
personal example to demonstrate the process approach to decision making. Consider
the following scenario: You’re upset because your midterm grades are much lower than
you’d hoped. To make matters worse, not only are you in trouble academically, but also
the other members of your business-project team are annoyed because you’re not
pulling your weight. Your lacrosse coach is very upset because you’ve missed too many
practices, and members of the mountain-biking club of which you’re supposed to be
president are talking about impeaching you if you don’t show up at the next meeting.
And your girlfriend says you’re ignoring her. (You can substitute ―boyfriend‖ here, of
course; we’re just trying to keep our exposition as simple as possible.)
A Six-Step Approach to Problem Solving
Assuming that your top priority is salvaging your GPA, let’s tackle your problem by using
a six-step approach to solving problems that don’t have simple solutions. We’ve
summarized this model in Figure 6.12 "How to Solve a Problem". [4]
Figure 6.12 How to Solve a Problem
44
1. Identify the problem you want to work on. Step one is getting to know your problem,
which you can formulate by asking yourself a basic question: How can I improve my
grades?
2. Gather relevant data. Step two is gathering information that will shed light on the
problem. Let’s rehash some of the relevant information that you’ve already identified:
(a) you did poorly on your finals because you didn’t spend enough time studying; (b)
you didn’t study because you went to see your girlfriend (who lives about three hours
from campus) over the weekend before your exams (and on most other weekends,
as a matter of fact); (c) what little studying you got in came at the expense of your
team project and lacrosse practice; and (d) while you were away for the weekend,
you forgot to tell members of the mountain-biking club that you had to cancel the
planned meeting.
3. Clarify the problem. Once you review all the given facts, you should see that your
problem is bigger than simply getting your grades up; your life is pretty much out of
control. You can’t handle everything to which you’ve committed yourself. Something
45
has to give. You clarify the problem by summing it up with another basic question:
What can I do to get my life back in order?
4. Generate possible solutions. If you thought defining the problem was tough, wait
until you’ve moved on to this stage. Let’s say that you’ve come up with the following
possible solutions to your problem: (a) quit the lacrosse team, (b) step down as
president of the mountain-biking club, (c) let team members do your share of work
on the business project, and (d) stop visiting your girlfriend so frequently. The
solution to your main problem—how to get your life back in order—will probably
require multiple actions.
5. Select the best option. This is clearly the toughest part of the process. Working your
way through your various options, you arrive at the following conclusions: (a) you
can’t quit the lacrosse team because you’d lose your scholarship; (b) you can resign
your post in the mountain-biking club, but that won’t free up much time; (c) you can’t
let your business-project team down (and besides, you’d just get a low grade); and
(d) she wouldn’t like the idea, but you could visit your girlfriend, say, once a month
rather than once a week. So what’s the most feasible (if not necessarily perfect)
solution? Probably visiting your girlfriend once a month and giving up the presidency
of the mountain-biking club.
6. Implement your decision and monitor your choice. When you call your girlfriend,
you’re pleasantly surprised to find that she understands. The vice president is happy
to take over the mountain-biking club. After the first week, you’re able to attend
lacrosse practice, get caught up on your team business project, and catch up in all
your other classes. The real test of your solution will be the results of the semester’s
finals.
Applying Your Skills at Notes-4-You
So, what types of skills will managers at Notes-4-You need? To oversee note-taking
and copying operations, first-line managers will require technical skills, probably in
operations and perhaps in accounting. Middle managers will need strong interpersonal
46
skills to maintain positive working relationships with subordinates and to motivate them.
As president, because you have to solve problems and come up with creative ways to
keep the business growing, you’ll need conceptual skills. And everyone will have to
communicate effectively: after all, because you’re in the business of selling written
notes, it would look pretty bad if your employees wrote poorly. Finally, everyone will
have to use time efficiently and call on problem-solving skills to handle the day-to-day
crises that seem to plague every new company.
K E Y T A K E A W A Y S
The skills needed by managers vary according to level.
Top managers need strong conceptual skills, while those at midlevel need good interpersonal skills and those at lower levels need technical skills.
All managers need strong communication, decision-making, and time- management skills.
E X E R C I S E S
(AACSB) Communication
If you were to ask a job recruiter what skills he or she looks for in a candidate, one of the first things you’ll hear is ―communication skills.‖ Strong communication skills not only will help you get a good job but also will help you move up the ladder. How can you strengthen your written and oral communication skills while you’re still a college student? Here are a few steps you can take:
o Look for courses (or course components) designed to strengthen communication skills, such as writing (or composition) or speech classes.
o Find out whether your college has a writing program.
o Check into nonacademic programs designed to strengthen communication skills, such as courses on interview techniques offered by the career services office.
o Find out how you can do some writing for the school newspaper or, if you’re a little more outgoing, how you can appear in theatrical productions.
47
By following these suggestions, you should get a very good idea of what your college can do to help you develop both written and oral communication skills. Write a brief report detailing your findings.
(AACSB) Reflective Skills
Do you ever reach the end of the day and wonder what you’ve accomplished? To succeed in management, you need to learn how to manage your time. The Internet is an interesting place to start. For many college students, surfing the Net takes up a lot of time that could be put to better use. How much time do you spend online, instant- messaging, shopping, playing games, blogging, or indulging in some other enjoyable but time-consuming activity? One approach to solving the problem of wasted online time is to apply the six-step, problem-solving procedure that we outlined in the chapter. Write a brief report detailing each of the steps that you take to solve the problem and implement a solution.
[1] Brian Perkins, ―Defining Crisis Management,‖ Wharton Alumni Magazine, Summer 2000, http://whartonmagazine.com/issues/summer-2000/reunion-2000/ (accessed October 8, 2011). [2] Brian L. Davis et al., Successful Manager’s Handbook: Development Suggestions for Today’s Managers (Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions Inc., 1992), 189. [3] Brian L. Davis et al., Successful Manager’s Handbook: Development Suggestions for Today’s Managers (Minneapolis: Personnel Decisions Inc., 1992), 189. [4] Shari Caudron, ―Six Steps in Creative Problem Solving,‖ Controller Magazine, April 1998, 38. Caudron describes a systematic approach developed by Roger L. Firestien, president of Innovation Systems Group, Williamsville, NY.
6.7 Cases and Problems
L E A R N I N G O N T H E W E B ( A A C S B )
Mission “Improvisable”
A mission statement tells customers, employees, and stakeholders why the organization exists—its purpose. It can be concise, like the one from Mary Kay Cosmetics—―To enrich the lives of women around the world‖—or it can be more detailed, such as the following from FedEx:
48
FedEx Corporation will produce superior financial returns for its shareowners by providing high value-added logistics, transportation and related business services through focused operating companies. Customer requirements will be met in the highest quality manner appropriate to each market segment served. FedEx will strive to develop mutually rewarding relationships with its employees, partners and suppliers. Safety will be the first consideration in all operations. Corporate activities will be conducted to the highest ethical and professional standards.
Mission statements are typically constructed to communicate several pieces of information: what the company strives to accomplish, what it’s known for, and how it serves its customers. Here are a few examples:
The Hershey Company: Bringing sweet moments of Hershey happiness to the world every day.
Microsoft: Our Mission At Microsoft, we work to help people and businesses throughout the world realize their full potential. This is our mission. Everything we do reflects this mission and the values that make it possible.
Google: Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Assignment
Create hypothetical mission statements for each of these four companies: Outback Steakhouse, Tesoro, Got Junk?, and Staples. To find descriptions of all four, go to the Web site for each of the companies: http://www.outbacksteakhouse.com,http://www.tesorocorp.com, http://www. 1800gotjunk.com/us_en,http://www.staples.com.
In composing your four mission statements, follow the format suggested previously: each statement should be about two or three sentences long and should provide several pieces of information—what the company strives to accomplish, what it’s known for, and how it serves its customers (and perhaps its employees and shareholders, too).
One last thing: your statements should be originals, not duplicates of the companies’ official statements.
C A R E E R O P P O R T U N I T I E S
To Manage or Not to Manage? Are you interested in a career that pays well and offers power, prestige, and a feeling of accomplishment? A career in management may be for you, but be forewarned that there’s a downside: you have to make tough decisions, other people will be after your job, and it can be lonely at the top. To find out more about the pros and cons of a management career, go to
49
http://management.about.com/cs/yourself/a/ManagementForMe.htm to link to the About.com Web site and read the article ―Is Management for Me?‖ Then, answer the following questions, being sure to provide an explanation for each of your answers:
Which of the pros of being a manager are important to you? Which are not?
Which of the cons might discourage you from pursuing a management career?
Which might not?
Considering balance, does a career in management appeal to you? Why, or why
not?
E T H I C S A N G L E ( A A C S B )
Sugarcoating the News at Krispy Kreme
According to Krispy Kreme’s ―Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers,‖ the company’s top executives are expected to practice and promote honest, ethical conduct. They’re also responsible for the health and overall performance of the company. Recently, however, things have gone wrong in the top echelons of the doughnut-shop chain.
First, a little background. Founded as one small doughnut shop in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, in 1937, the brand became increasingly popular over the next six decades, taking off in the 1980s and 1990s. By 2003, Krispy Kreme (which went public in 2000) was selling more than a billion doughnuts a year. That’s when things started to go stale. (For more details on the company’s ups and downs, go to http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/apnews/stories/012205/D87OTSIG0.shtml and read the article ―Krispy Kreme: The Rise, Fall, Rise and Fall of a Southern Icon.‖)
When sales first started to decline in the fall of 2003, CEO Scott Livengood offered a variety of creative explanations, mostly for the benefit of anxious investors: high gas prices discouraged people from driving to doughnut shops; supermarket sales were down because grocery stores were losing business to Wal-Mart; people were cutting back on carbohydrates because of the popular Atkins diet. Unfortunately, other (more plausible) explanations were beginning to surface. To complete this exercise, you’ll need to find out what they were. Go to both http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/toc/05_02/B39150502manager.htm andhttp:// www.usatoday.com/money/industries/food/2005-08-10-krispy- kreme_x.htm?POE=MONISVA to link to the BusinessWeek and USA Today Web sites, and then read these articles: ―The Best and Worst Managers of the Year‖ and ―Krispy Kreme Must Restate Earnings by $25.6M.‖ Once you have a good grasp of the company’s problems and you’ve read about the people who are responsible, answer the following questions, being sure to provide explanations for your responses:
1. What factors contributed to the problems at Krispy Kreme? What happened to the company? Who was hurt?
50
2. Should the firm’s problems be attributed to poor management, unethical behavior on the part of the executive team, or both?
3. Judging from the lessons of the Krispy Kreme case, how important do you think it is for a firm to have strong top-down leadership?
4. If you’d been the CEO of Krispy Kreme, what things would you have done differently?
T E A M - B U I L D I N G S K I L L S ( A A C S B )
Assessing Your School’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
How can you and other members of your team help your college or university assess its fit with its environment? For one thing, you could apply SWOT analysis.
Begin by picking a member of the team to write down ideas generated by the group using brainstorming (a technique used to generate ideas that have no right or wrong answers and are accepted by the group without criticism). Pick a different member of the team to complete the SWOT analysis in the format listed subsequently. Then follow these steps:
1. Using brainstorming, identify internal factors, either positive or negative, that are unique to your school. List all items suggested by group members on a large sheet of paper or a blackboard.
2. Based on your analysis of the items listed (in step 1), the team should select at least five factors that are strengths and five that are weaknesses.
3. List the selected strengths and weaknesses in the SWOT analysis form.
4. Using brainstorming, identify external factors that could influence your school in either a positive or a negative way. Include all items suggested by group members. List the ideas on a large sheet of paper or a blackboard.
5. Based on your analysis of the items listed (in step 4), select at least five opportunities that could benefit your school and five threats to its success.
6. List the selected opportunities and threats in the SWOT analysis form.
7. Analyze the selected opportunities and strengths (which have been listed on the SWOT analysis form) and identify several ways in which your school can take advantage of opportunities by making the most of its strengths. Record your suggestions on the SWOT analysis form.
8. Analyze the selected threats and weaknesses (which have been listed on the SWOT analysis form) and identify several ways in which your school can protect itself from
51
threats and overcome its weaknesses. Record your suggestions on the SWOT analysis form.
Team Members
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
o Ways in which your school can take advantage of opportunities by making the most of its strengths
o Ways in which your school can protect itself from threats and overcome its weaknesses
T H E G L O B A L V I E W ( A A C S B )
The Art and Science of Organizational Evolution
A company’s organizational structure defines the formal relationships among the people in it. It also reflects an arrangement of positions that’s most appropriate for the company at a specific point in time. As the business expands or changes directions, its organizational structure should also change.
With these principles in mind, let’s trace the evolution of a hypothetical company called High-Tech Cases, which manufactures and sells DVD cases made out of a special high- tech material.
Stage 1
When the company was founded, it operated under a functional organizational structure, with the following key positions and reporting relationships:
Position Reports to
CEO No one
VP of Sales and Marketing CEO
52
Position Reports to
VP of Production CEO
VP of Finance CEO
Director of Sales VP Sales/Marketing
Director of Advertising VP Sales/Marketing
Director of Operations VP Production
Director of Engineering VP Production
Treasurer VP Finance
Controller VP Finance
In addition, two salespeople reported to the director of sales. The directors of advertising, operations, and engineering each had two assistants, as did the treasurer and the controller.
Stage 2
About three years after the company’s founding, the management team decided to expand sales into Asia. The director of sales retained responsibility for the United States, while a new director was added for Asia. The two salespeople who had been with the company since its beginning focused on U.S. sales, and two new salespeople were hired to handle Asia. No other position changed, and for the next two years, all personnel worked out of the U.S. headquarters.
Stage 3
By the beginning of the fifth year of operations, Asian and U.S. sales were about the same. At this point, management decided to set up two separate operations—one in the United States and the other in China. A senior VP was hired to head each operation— senior VP of U.S. operations and senior VP of Asian operations. Both would report to the CEO. Each operational unit would run its own production facilities, arrange its own financing, and be in charge of its sales and marketing activities. As a result, High-Tech Cases almost doubled in size, but management believed that the restructuring was appropriate and would increase profits in the long run.
53
Assignment
Create three organization charts—one for each stage in High-Tech’s development. Ideally, you should make your charts with some type of organization-chart software. To use the tool available in Microsoft Word, go to the Standard Toolbarin Microsoft Word, click on ―Help,‖ and type in organization chart. Then select ―create a chart.‖