XR03
2 years ago 40
Assessment1.docx
XR4003_Rubric.pdf
Assessment1.docx
ASSESSMENT
Part 1: Sampling Method Evaluation (500 words)
Read the Cannady and Adams (2021) study and reflect on the sampling methods used in this study. Then, compose a short paper evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study. Be specific and provide examples. Did the sampling method used in this study render reliable and valid results? Why or why not? What could the researcher have done to improve the sampling process? Be specific and support your assertions with evidence from Module 1 and 2 Learning Activities and readings.
Part 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research in Nursing Practice
Select a quantitative research article from a list of seven (7). Choose an article based on a topic of your interest. Topics included are women's health, mental health, veteran care, prisoner population, pediatrics, community health, and medical–surgical.
Complete the Performance Task Submission Template based on the specific components of the article you selected. Make sure to use your own words; quoting is not allowed.
XR4003_Rubric.pdf
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XR4003: Quantitative Research: Evaluate quantitative research methods and their impact on nursing practice.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Introduction to Quantitative Research
Part 1: Sampling Method Evaluation
Write an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study. Be specific and provide details and examples. Learning Objective 1.1: Evaluate sampling methods in a quantitative research study
Response provides a fully developed evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Response provides an adequately developed of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Response does not provide an adequate evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Did the sampling method used in this study render reliable and valid results? Why or why not? Learning Objective 1.2: Assess the reliability and validity of a research study based on the sampling methods
Response provides a fully developed discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
Response provides an adequately developed discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
Response does not provide an adequate discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
What could the researcher have done to improve the sampling process? Be specific and support your assertions with evidence from Module 1 Learning Activities and readings. Learning Objective 1.3: Explain how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved
Response provides a fully developed explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Response provides an adequately developed explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Response does not provide an adequate explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Module 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research
Part 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research in Nursing Practice
Provide a reference citation for the selected article (in APA format) Learning Objective 2.1 Formulate a reference citation in APA format
Response provides a complete and accurate reference citation in APA format.
Response provides a partially complete or accurate reference citation.
Response does not provide a reference citation in APA format; or, provides a citation that is not in APA format.
Summarize the research design. Learning Objective 2.2: Summarize the research design of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate summary of the research design.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate summary of the research design.
Response does not provide an adequate summary of the research design.
Describe sample population and selection methods.
Response provides a fully developed and accurate description of the sample
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate description of the
Response does not provide an adequate description of
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Learning Objective 2.3: Identify sample population and selection methods of a quantitative study
population and selection methods.
sample population and selection methods.
the sample population and selection methods.
Describe data collection methods. Learning Objective 2.4: Describe data collection methods of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate description of the data collection methods.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate description of the data collection methods.
Response does not provide an adequate description of the data collection methods.
Summarize data analysis and results. Learning Objective 2.5: Summarize data analysis and results of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate summary of the data analysis and results.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate summary of the data analysis and results.
Response does not provide an adequate summary of the data analysis and results.
Describe two strengths of the study and explain why they are considered strengths. Learning Objective 2.6: Analyze strengths of a quantitative research study
Response describes 2 strengths of the study and provides a fully developed and accurate explanation of why they are considered strengths.
Response describes 2 strengths of the study and provides an adequately developed and accurate explanation of why they are considered strengths.
Response does not describe 2 strengths of the study or explanation of strengths is not adequate.
Describe two weaknesses of the study and explain why they are considered a weakness.
Response describes 2 weaknesses of the study and provides a fully developed and accurate
Response describes 2 weaknesses of the study and provides an adequately developed
Response does not describe 2 weaknesses of the study or
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Learning Objective 2.7: Analyze weaknesses of a quantitative research study
explanation of why they are considered weaknesses.
and accurate explanation of why they are considered weaknesses.
explanation of weaknesses is not adequate.
Explain how the findings of this article could effectively be used in clinical practice (5–7 sentences). Be specific and include details. Learning Objective 2.8: Analyze the impact of a quantitative research study on nursing practice
Response provides a fully developed and accurate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Response does not provide an adequate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Professional Writing Skills
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well- organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Assessment1.docx
ASSESSMENT
Part 1: Sampling Method Evaluation (500 words)
Read the Cannady and Adams (2021) study and reflect on the sampling methods used in this study. Then, compose a short paper evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study. Be specific and provide examples. Did the sampling method used in this study render reliable and valid results? Why or why not? What could the researcher have done to improve the sampling process? Be specific and support your assertions with evidence from Module 1 and 2 Learning Activities and readings.
Part 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research in Nursing Practice
Select a quantitative research article from a list of seven (7). Choose an article based on a topic of your interest. Topics included are women's health, mental health, veteran care, prisoner population, pediatrics, community health, and medical–surgical.
Complete the Performance Task Submission Template based on the specific components of the article you selected. Make sure to use your own words; quoting is not allowed.
XR4003_Rubric.pdf
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XR4003: Quantitative Research: Evaluate quantitative research methods and their impact on nursing practice.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Introduction to Quantitative Research
Part 1: Sampling Method Evaluation
Write an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study. Be specific and provide details and examples. Learning Objective 1.1: Evaluate sampling methods in a quantitative research study
Response provides a fully developed evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Response provides an adequately developed of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Response does not provide an adequate evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the sampling method used in this study.
Did the sampling method used in this study render reliable and valid results? Why or why not? Learning Objective 1.2: Assess the reliability and validity of a research study based on the sampling methods
Response provides a fully developed discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
Response provides an adequately developed discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
Response does not provide an adequate discussion of the study’s validity and reliability based on sampling methods.
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
What could the researcher have done to improve the sampling process? Be specific and support your assertions with evidence from Module 1 Learning Activities and readings. Learning Objective 1.3: Explain how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved
Response provides a fully developed explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Response provides an adequately developed explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Response does not provide an adequate explanation of how the sampling process of a quantitative research study could be improved.
Module 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research
Part 2: Evaluating Quantitative Research in Nursing Practice
Provide a reference citation for the selected article (in APA format) Learning Objective 2.1 Formulate a reference citation in APA format
Response provides a complete and accurate reference citation in APA format.
Response provides a partially complete or accurate reference citation.
Response does not provide a reference citation in APA format; or, provides a citation that is not in APA format.
Summarize the research design. Learning Objective 2.2: Summarize the research design of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate summary of the research design.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate summary of the research design.
Response does not provide an adequate summary of the research design.
Describe sample population and selection methods.
Response provides a fully developed and accurate description of the sample
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate description of the
Response does not provide an adequate description of
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Learning Objective 2.3: Identify sample population and selection methods of a quantitative study
population and selection methods.
sample population and selection methods.
the sample population and selection methods.
Describe data collection methods. Learning Objective 2.4: Describe data collection methods of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate description of the data collection methods.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate description of the data collection methods.
Response does not provide an adequate description of the data collection methods.
Summarize data analysis and results. Learning Objective 2.5: Summarize data analysis and results of a quantitative study
Response provides a fully developed and accurate summary of the data analysis and results.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate summary of the data analysis and results.
Response does not provide an adequate summary of the data analysis and results.
Describe two strengths of the study and explain why they are considered strengths. Learning Objective 2.6: Analyze strengths of a quantitative research study
Response describes 2 strengths of the study and provides a fully developed and accurate explanation of why they are considered strengths.
Response describes 2 strengths of the study and provides an adequately developed and accurate explanation of why they are considered strengths.
Response does not describe 2 strengths of the study or explanation of strengths is not adequate.
Describe two weaknesses of the study and explain why they are considered a weakness.
Response describes 2 weaknesses of the study and provides a fully developed and accurate
Response describes 2 weaknesses of the study and provides an adequately developed
Response does not describe 2 weaknesses of the study or
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 4
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Learning Objective 2.7: Analyze weaknesses of a quantitative research study
explanation of why they are considered weaknesses.
and accurate explanation of why they are considered weaknesses.
explanation of weaknesses is not adequate.
Explain how the findings of this article could effectively be used in clinical practice (5–7 sentences). Be specific and include details. Learning Objective 2.8: Analyze the impact of a quantitative research study on nursing practice
Response provides a fully developed and accurate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Response provides an adequately developed and accurate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Response does not provide an adequate explanation of how findings from article could be used in clinical practice.
Professional Writing Skills
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well- organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
© 1/19/2024 Walden University, LLC 5
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.