XP02ASSIgment
a year ago 30
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
XP4002_TemplateAnnotatedBibliography.docx
XP4002_Rubric.pdf
RubricAnnotatedBIBLIOGRAPHY.docx
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
ASSESSMENT
PART 1 ( USE TEMPLATE)
Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies
PART 2 ( USE TEMPLATE
Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Paper
Select from the following topics:
· Homeless veterans
· Migrants and health issues
· Pregnant Teens
· Elderly and mental health
· American Indians and opioid addiction
· A population of your choice as approved by your faculty
After selecting your topic, address the following in your writing, using at least three scholarly references (published within the last 5 years):
· Introduce your chosen population taken from the list of options. Describe the population within the context of your local community.
· Discuss one upstream policy (local, state, or national) that addresses social determinants of health needs for the population within your community.
· What have been the effects of that policy?
· Describe the role of ethics in policymaking. How does the policy adhere to being ethical?
Submission Length: 2—3 pages.
XP4002_TemplateAnnotatedBibliography.docx
2
XP4002
Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Template
Student Name Here
Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University
Course Number, Section, and Title
(Example: NURS 0000 Section 01, Title of Course)
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to Instructor.)
1. Source Citation #1 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
2. Source Citation #2 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
3. Source Citation #3 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
XP4002_Rubric.pdf
© 2024 Walden University 1
XP4002: Socioeconomic Impact of Healthcare Delivery: Formulate leadership and advocacy strategies to reduce health disparities, advance ethical nursing, and promote health equity in policies.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Socioeconomic Impact of Healthcare Delivery
Construct an Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Paper.
• Introduced and described chosen population
Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
The response comprehensively and clearly introduces and describes the population.
The response includes
relevant, specific, and
appropriate examples
that fully support the
identification and
description.
The response introduces and describes the population. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification and description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces and describes the population, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification and description, or it is missing.
• Discussed one upstream policy that addresses social determinants of health
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
The response comprehensively and clearly discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the discussion.
The response discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the discussion.
The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the discussion, or it is missing.
© 2024 Walden University 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
• Analyzed the effects of the
outlined policy
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the effects of the outlined policy. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.
The response analyzes the effects of the outlined policy. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the analysis.
The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes the effects of the outlined policy, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.
• Described the role of ethics in
policymaking.
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the role of ethics in policymaking. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
The response describes the role of ethics in policymaking. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the role of ethics in policymaking, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
Professional Writing Skills Assessment
© 2024 Walden University 3
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization and does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
© 2024 Walden University 4
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
RubricAnnotatedBIBLIOGRAPHY.docx
Use the following rubric to assess your response to the prompt:
|
Rubric Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
Complete the Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies template.
· Provided source citation for three sources to be used in the paper.
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
Accurate source citations are provided for three relevant sources. |
Source citations are provided for three relevant sources. |
Source citations are provided for three resources, or it is missing. |
|
· Provided a summary of content for the three sources.
Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking |
The response comprehensively and clearly summarizes three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the summary.
|
The response summarizes three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the summary.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the summary, or it is missing.
|
|
· Provided evaluation for use of the three sources. Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
The response comprehensively and clearly evaluates three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the evaluation.
|
The response evaluates three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the evaluation.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the evaluation, or it is missing.
|
|
· Provided application of use in the paper for the three sources Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
The response comprehensively and clearly provides an application for three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the application.
|
The response provides an application for three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the application.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides an application for three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the application, or it is missing.
|
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
ASSESSMENT
PART 1 ( USE TEMPLATE)
Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies
PART 2 ( USE TEMPLATE
Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Paper
Select from the following topics:
· Homeless veterans
· Migrants and health issues
· Pregnant Teens
· Elderly and mental health
· American Indians and opioid addiction
· A population of your choice as approved by your faculty
After selecting your topic, address the following in your writing, using at least three scholarly references (published within the last 5 years):
· Introduce your chosen population taken from the list of options. Describe the population within the context of your local community.
· Discuss one upstream policy (local, state, or national) that addresses social determinants of health needs for the population within your community.
· What have been the effects of that policy?
· Describe the role of ethics in policymaking. How does the policy adhere to being ethical?
Submission Length: 2—3 pages.
XP4002_TemplateAnnotatedBibliography.docx
2
XP4002
Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Template
Student Name Here
Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University
Course Number, Section, and Title
(Example: NURS 0000 Section 01, Title of Course)
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to Instructor.)
1. Source Citation #1 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
2. Source Citation #2 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
3. Source Citation #3 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or paper in a few sentences.
XP4002_Rubric.pdf
© 2024 Walden University 1
XP4002: Socioeconomic Impact of Healthcare Delivery: Formulate leadership and advocacy strategies to reduce health disparities, advance ethical nursing, and promote health equity in policies.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Socioeconomic Impact of Healthcare Delivery
Construct an Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies Paper.
• Introduced and described chosen population
Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
The response comprehensively and clearly introduces and describes the population.
The response includes
relevant, specific, and
appropriate examples
that fully support the
identification and
description.
The response introduces and describes the population. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification and description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces and describes the population, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification and description, or it is missing.
• Discussed one upstream policy that addresses social determinants of health
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
The response comprehensively and clearly discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the discussion.
The response discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the discussion.
The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses one upstream policy addressing SDoH, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the discussion, or it is missing.
© 2024 Walden University 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
• Analyzed the effects of the
outlined policy
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
The response comprehensively and clearly analyzes the effects of the outlined policy. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.
The response analyzes the effects of the outlined policy. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the analysis.
The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes the effects of the outlined policy, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.
• Described the role of ethics in
policymaking.
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the role of ethics in policymaking. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
The response describes the role of ethics in policymaking. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the role of ethics in policymaking, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
Professional Writing Skills Assessment
© 2024 Walden University 3
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization and does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while
© 2024 Walden University 4
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet
Expectations
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
RubricAnnotatedBIBLIOGRAPHY.docx
Use the following rubric to assess your response to the prompt:
|
Rubric Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
|
Complete the Annotated Bibliography: Equitable and Ethical Population Health Policies template.
· Provided source citation for three sources to be used in the paper.
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
Accurate source citations are provided for three relevant sources. |
Source citations are provided for three relevant sources. |
Source citations are provided for three resources, or it is missing. |
|
· Provided a summary of content for the three sources.
Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking |
The response comprehensively and clearly summarizes three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the summary.
|
The response summarizes three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the summary.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the summary, or it is missing.
|
|
· Provided evaluation for use of the three sources. Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
The response comprehensively and clearly evaluates three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the evaluation.
|
The response evaluates three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the evaluation.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the evaluation, or it is missing.
|
|
· Provided application of use in the paper for the three sources Learning Objective 1.1: Select a population group to assess issues and impact within a community
Learning Objective 1.2: Describe how socioeconomic and health inequities for populations are improved by addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in communities
Learning Objective 1.3: Identify upstream population health policy approaches in rural and urban environments
Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the role of ethics in policymaking
|
The response comprehensively and clearly provides an application for three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the application.
|
The response provides an application for three sources.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the application.
|
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides an application for three sources, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the application, or it is missing.
|