Wikipedia Topic Selection
3 years ago 34
DirectionsforWikiAssignment.docx
WikipediaEditorProjectdescription.docx
DirectionsforWikiAssignment.docx
Review the Wikipedia Editor Project description.
Read Wikipedia: An opportunity to rethink the links between sources' credibility, trust, and authority
Links to an external site.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia:Five pillars
Links to an external site.
Links to an external site.
· Jimmy Wales, the cofounder of Wikipedia, said his goal is to give “every single person on the planet…free access to the sum of all human knowledge."
· Does Wikipedia cover topics you find interesting? Select 5 articles you want to explore in depth. Are you a qualified editor for those articles?
Review the change record. Study the change record at the bottom of each of your topics. Is this article up to date? Does it seem to be controversial—are edits being accepted and then rescinded later? Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. Some articles require you to establish a track record before you can edit high-traffic articles; some are even more protected.
Submit a list of the five articles you intend to edit. Do you meet the Wikipedia standards to edit this article? Will your changes conform to the Five Pillars
? Will your changes be verifiable? What is the likelihood your changes will be accepted?
Resource : Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, creating, and maintaining articles/Editing for the first time
WikipediaEditorProjectdescription.docx
Wikipedia Editor Project
Databases of information created by and for a community with a common interest are becoming common. These information sources are replacing traditional repositories of information—such as encyclopedias, textbooks, and peer-reviewed journals—as the source of instructional materials. In this transition, Wikipedia has emerged as the most readily available compendium of information and is accessed daily by both teachers and students to inform learning and instruction. Despite this intense use in schools, the general impression of many teachers is that Wikipedia is not a credible source of information and should not be cited in school assignments. This opinion is prevalent in K-12 education and all through academia.
But let’s find out.
The purpose of this project is to explore the processes by which the community of users creates and edits Wikipedia. First you will review external evaluations of Wikipedia’s credibility. What is the purpose of Wikipedia? What level of credibility does Wikipedia claim? Then review the external evaluations of Wikipedia’s credibility. Does Wikipedia meet its own level of credibility? How does it compare to other encyclopedias?
Once you get oriented to Wikipedia’s past and present standards of credibility, you’ll register to become a Wikipedia editor. It’s free.
Next you’ll select five unique articles you want to edit. One of the articles must be on a living person, as Wikipedia has specific standards for these entries. Explore your chosen articles in depth, analyzing the change record for each of your five unique topics. Will you be allowed to edit the articles, or are they restricted to a category of editor with more experience? Tip: You will be more successful editing an article on the history of your High School than you will be adding a section to the history of the National Football League. The high visibility articles are highly scrutinized by Wikipedia editors and changes are rarely accepted, whereas if you are an expert on an area of the country or a little-known event in history, you may write a whole article yourself ( not required) and all your work be accepted.
If you are restricted from one of the articles you intended to edit, choose alternatives until you have a total of five articles you can edit. One article of the five articles must be on a living person. Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Buettner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron_Katie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Burrus
Now edit the five articles. Any type of edit is acceptable, from minimal proofreading corrections to substantive content addition.
What happens? How long does it take for your edit to be reviewed? Is it accepted or dismissed? Evaluate the response of the community (if any) to your edits.
Finally reflect on the experience, and the implications of what you learned about creating and evaluating the credibility of other community-created wikis.
|
Project Components |
|
Your initial opinion of Wikipedia’s credibility. What is your experience with Wikipedia? What have people told you? What is your surface opinion? Expert evaluations and opinions on Wikipedia’s validity. Dive into the research. Cite at least three experts or research studies. What is community-based credibility? Has the credibility of Wikipedia changed over time?
|
|
Choose 5 topics/article you want to explore in depth. Are you a qualified editor? Change record review. Study the change record at the bottom of each of your topics. Is this article up-to-date? Does it seem like it’s been controversial—edits being accepted and then rescinded?
|
|
Edits to 5 topics. Now it’s up to you. Register as an editor and make edits to your 5 topics of interest.
|
|
Community’s reactions to your 5 edits. Did your comments make the Change Record? Did you get deleted, asked for more supporting references, or overlooked completely? How do you feel about the changes or adoption of your edits? Has this project changed your opinion of community-based credibility? Post your changes and Wikipedia reactions in the Discussion for your classmates’ consideration. |
DirectionsforWikiAssignment.docx
Review the Wikipedia Editor Project description.
Read Wikipedia: An opportunity to rethink the links between sources' credibility, trust, and authority
Links to an external site.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia:Five pillars
Links to an external site.
Links to an external site.
· Jimmy Wales, the cofounder of Wikipedia, said his goal is to give “every single person on the planet…free access to the sum of all human knowledge."
· Does Wikipedia cover topics you find interesting? Select 5 articles you want to explore in depth. Are you a qualified editor for those articles?
Review the change record. Study the change record at the bottom of each of your topics. Is this article up to date? Does it seem to be controversial—are edits being accepted and then rescinded later? Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. Some articles require you to establish a track record before you can edit high-traffic articles; some are even more protected.
Submit a list of the five articles you intend to edit. Do you meet the Wikipedia standards to edit this article? Will your changes conform to the Five Pillars
? Will your changes be verifiable? What is the likelihood your changes will be accepted?
Resource : Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, creating, and maintaining articles/Editing for the first time
WikipediaEditorProjectdescription.docx
Wikipedia Editor Project
Databases of information created by and for a community with a common interest are becoming common. These information sources are replacing traditional repositories of information—such as encyclopedias, textbooks, and peer-reviewed journals—as the source of instructional materials. In this transition, Wikipedia has emerged as the most readily available compendium of information and is accessed daily by both teachers and students to inform learning and instruction. Despite this intense use in schools, the general impression of many teachers is that Wikipedia is not a credible source of information and should not be cited in school assignments. This opinion is prevalent in K-12 education and all through academia.
But let’s find out.
The purpose of this project is to explore the processes by which the community of users creates and edits Wikipedia. First you will review external evaluations of Wikipedia’s credibility. What is the purpose of Wikipedia? What level of credibility does Wikipedia claim? Then review the external evaluations of Wikipedia’s credibility. Does Wikipedia meet its own level of credibility? How does it compare to other encyclopedias?
Once you get oriented to Wikipedia’s past and present standards of credibility, you’ll register to become a Wikipedia editor. It’s free.
Next you’ll select five unique articles you want to edit. One of the articles must be on a living person, as Wikipedia has specific standards for these entries. Explore your chosen articles in depth, analyzing the change record for each of your five unique topics. Will you be allowed to edit the articles, or are they restricted to a category of editor with more experience? Tip: You will be more successful editing an article on the history of your High School than you will be adding a section to the history of the National Football League. The high visibility articles are highly scrutinized by Wikipedia editors and changes are rarely accepted, whereas if you are an expert on an area of the country or a little-known event in history, you may write a whole article yourself ( not required) and all your work be accepted.
If you are restricted from one of the articles you intended to edit, choose alternatives until you have a total of five articles you can edit. One article of the five articles must be on a living person. Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Buettner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron_Katie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Burrus
Now edit the five articles. Any type of edit is acceptable, from minimal proofreading corrections to substantive content addition.
What happens? How long does it take for your edit to be reviewed? Is it accepted or dismissed? Evaluate the response of the community (if any) to your edits.
Finally reflect on the experience, and the implications of what you learned about creating and evaluating the credibility of other community-created wikis.
|
Project Components |
|
Your initial opinion of Wikipedia’s credibility. What is your experience with Wikipedia? What have people told you? What is your surface opinion? Expert evaluations and opinions on Wikipedia’s validity. Dive into the research. Cite at least three experts or research studies. What is community-based credibility? Has the credibility of Wikipedia changed over time?
|
|
Choose 5 topics/article you want to explore in depth. Are you a qualified editor? Change record review. Study the change record at the bottom of each of your topics. Is this article up-to-date? Does it seem like it’s been controversial—edits being accepted and then rescinded?
|
|
Edits to 5 topics. Now it’s up to you. Register as an editor and make edits to your 5 topics of interest.
|
|
Community’s reactions to your 5 edits. Did your comments make the Change Record? Did you get deleted, asked for more supporting references, or overlooked completely? How do you feel about the changes or adoption of your edits? Has this project changed your opinion of community-based credibility? Post your changes and Wikipedia reactions in the Discussion for your classmates’ consideration. |