Week 2 Discussion 1

 Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following questions:

• What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and the Wentzes?
• Did the Wentzes perform under the contract?
• Did the court find specific performance to be an adequate legal remedy in this case?
• Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing its legal contract?
• How could Campbell change its contract in the future so as to avoid the unconsionability problem?

Rogers, S. (2012). Essentials of Business Law [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

• Chapter 4: Contracts: Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration
• Chapter 5: Contracts: Capacity, Genuine Assent, the Statute of Frauds, and Illegality
• Chapter 6: Third Parties, Performance and Discharge of Contracts, and Remedies
• Chapter 7: The UCC: Formation and Modification of the Sales Contract