VAPING

Perezhdez86*
  • 3 years ago
  • 25
files (4)

MINITHESIS.docx

One of the hardest things to do with complicated material is to explain it briefly. PhD students often compete in what are called "3-Minute Thesis" competitions where they have to explain their dissertation work, which has been years in the making, in only 3 minutes. You're going to do something similar, but with course material.

In this assignment, you are to give a 3 minute presentation using only the single slide that is provided for you in the .jpg file below. While the video will only be viewed by the person grading it, you should present it as if your audience was students taking this course (somewhat knowledgable on the subject, but not experts).

Your grade will be based on four factors.

1. Is the length of the presentation between 3 - 3.5 mnutes (180 - 210 seconds)? Anything shorter or longer than that will result in deductions.

2. Were all components of the provided slide discussed in the presentation?

3. Was the material presented factually accurate?

4. Did the video contain both audio and webcam video along with the slide?

VapingII.pdf

Vaping II

Stephan C. Jahn, Ph.D.

Pharmacology and Therapeutics

University of Florida

Primary Source: Cao et al, J. Med. Toxicol. (2020)

Health Risks of Vaping

 Definitive studies require long time-periods

 Early results show evidence of damage to  Cardiovascular system

 Myocardial infarction

 Stroke

 Respiratory system  COPD

 Increased infection risk

Myocardial Infarction

Alzahrani et al. Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction [published correction appears in Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):579-584]. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(4):455‐461. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004

Vaping and COVID-19

 COVID-19 cases more common in vapers and smokers  Very early data

 Self-reported

Shivani Mathur Gaiha, Jing Cheng, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, Association Between Youth Smoking, Electronic Cigarette Use, and Coronavirus Disease 2019, Journal of Adolescent Health, August 2020

E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use- Associated Lung Injury  EVALI

 Popcorn lung

 Gained widespread recognition summer 2019

 Criteria  Vaping within 90 days  Widespread abnormalities in imaging

 Ground glass on CT

 No pulmonary infection

 Symptoms  Respiratory

 Acute inflammatory response

 GI

Ground Glass

Mukhopadhyay et al. Lung Biopsy Findings in Severe Pulmonary Illness Associated With E-Cigarette Use (Vaping). Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;153(1):30‐39.

Time to Sleuth

 Most patients reported >1 year e-cigarette use

 Prevalence seemed to be increasing

 Assumed to be a “non-active” ingredient

 Diacetyl is used as butter flavor  Origin of “popcorn lung”  Didn’t seem to correlate

 82% had used THC e-liquid  Likely underreported  Most common brand: “Dank Vapes”

 Nearly all THC e-liquid contains vitamin-E acetate

Vitamin-E Acetate

 VEA

 Used as diluent  Propylene glycol and glycerin reduce viscosity of oil

 Visibly apparent

 Can be up to 90% of e-liquid

 Most common in “homemade” e-liquid  Dank Vapes

 Cartridges filled by retailers

VEA

 Generally regarded as safe  In cosmetics/supplements

 Antioxidant  Better shelf-life than vitamin-E

 Converted to vitamin-E in intestines  Not in lungs

Toxicological Mechanisms of VEA

 1. Converts lung surfactant from gel to liquid-crystal  Loss of function

 2. Heated VEA creates reactive molecules  Damaging lung tissues

 3. VEA may accumulate in lungs regardless of administration route

 4. THC may react with VEA  Importance?

VEA Doesn’t Have All the Answers

 Not all cases show VEA consumption  Underreporting?

 Link to GI symptoms?

The Difficult Choice

1 2

Tout Risks Tout Safety vs. Smoking

VapingI.pdf

Vaping I

Stephan C. Jahn, Ph.D.

Pharmacology and Therapeutics

University of Florida

Primary Source: Cao et al, J. Med. Toxicol. (2020)

Vaping

 Well-intentioned catastrophe  Safer

 Cessation

 Entered US market in 2006

 Vaping  Inhalation of aerosols

 Three primary purposes  Nicotine

 THC

 Flavor

Who Vapes?

 Nonpoor, young whites  Especially men

 Exponential growth  2018: 13.5% 8th graders, 34% 12th graders  2019: 40.5% of 12th graders  Most users 18-24

 Mixed reasons  Young

 Social  Flavors

 Older  Cessation

Vaping Devices  First generation

 One-time-use “cig-a-likes”

 Second generation  Reusable  Larger battery

 Third generation  “Mods”  Customizable

 Fourth generation  “Pods”  Flashdrive appearance  Juul  Marketed heavily to youth

Malanga and Smith https://www.sjuhawknews.com/health- officials-urge-students-to-stop-using- electronic-cigarettes/

E-Liquids

 Hard to pin down  Little regulation

 Rapidly changing market

 User refillable

 Inhaled components depend on heat generated by device  Potential for reactions or decomposition

Nicotine E-Liquids

 Contains:  Nicotine

 Purified

 Highly variable concentrations

 Juul has patent for nicotine acid salt to increase absorption

 Propylene glycol and/or glycerin  Thickeners

 Water

 Flavoring

 Concentrated nicotine poses threat to toddlers

Toxicology of Thickeners

 Propylene Glycol and Glycerin

 Extremely common in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals

 FDA “generally recognized as safe”

 Inhalation is a whole ‘nother ball game  Alveoli very delicate

 Decomposition products  i.e. acrolein

 Two studies show vaping thickeners alone causes epithelial injury and decreased oxygen absorption

Other E-Liquids

 THC  Similar to nicotine e-liquids in constituency

 Even more variability due to illicit nature

 More likely to contain vitamin-E acetate

 Used by ~20% of cannabis users

 Alcohol/caffeine  Dosages are small compared to normal consumption

 Still dangers due to excipients

 Other illicit drugs

 Flavors only

Vaping Pharmacokinetics

 Best studied with nicotine

 One session administers an average of 4 mg  3-4x one cigarette

 Plasma concentration plateaus around 13 ng/mL  Roughly equal to one cigarette

 Slower climb

 Less addictive?

St Helen G, Ross KC, Dempsey DA, Havel CM, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Nicotine Delivery and Vaping Behavior During ad Libitum E-cigarette Access. Tob Regul Sci. 2016;2(4):363‐376. doi:10.18001/TRS.2.4.8

file.jpgfile.JPG
This file is too large to display.View in new window