Validating a Resource

isdory

 

Validating a Resource

  • a year ago
  • 10
files (2)

HIM377ProjectMilestoneValidatingaResourcetemplate.docx

HIM377 Project Milestone

Validating a Resource

Name:

Directions:

Using the space provided below, you will identify and validate one resource of your choosing that you may be using to support the development of your Contingency Plan. Once you have provided your name and addressed each of the questions, be sure to save and upload your document.

1. Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

Title:

Author(s):

Date Published:

2. Relevance. How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

3. Validity. Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource? Is this resource a peer-reviewed or scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization)?

Module3.docx

Module 2: Project Milestone - Validating a Resource

For this milestone, you are being tasked with identifying one resource of your choosing that you may utilize to support the development of your Contingency Plan. You will be addressing questions about this chosen resource to validate it as a quality source.

Download the Project Milestone Validating a Resource template to use to address the questions below.

Project Milestone Validating a Resource template Download Project Milestone Validating a Resource template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader

· Provide the title of the book or article with the author(s) and date published.

· Relevance: How does this resource support your needs for developing a Contingency Plan?

· Valid: Are you able to verify the accuracy of your resource?

Factors to consider: Is the resource peer-reviewed or a scholarly publication? Does it come from a reputable source (government agency, industry association or organization).

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your files, select Submit Assignment.

Rubric

Milestone Validate a Resource

Milestone Validate a Resource

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Information

-Source Information -title of book or article -author(s) -date published

5 pts

Meets or Exceeds

Student submission meets the Source Information criteria: title, author(s) & date published

3 pts

In Progress

Student submission mostly meets the Source Information criteria by missing part of the title, author(s) or date published

1 pts

Little Evidence

Student submission provides only a component criteria of the Source Information or all components are incomplete

0 pts

No Evidence

Student submission does not meet the Source Information criteria

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Relevance Assessment

Source Relevance Assessment -Addresses what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source -Addresses how this source is relevant to Contingency Plan Project

7 pts

Meets or Exceeds

Student submission clearly and completely meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria

5 pts

In Progress

Student submission mostly meets both of the Relevance Assessment criteria but may only partially be supporting/clear information either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project

2 pts

Little Evidence

Student submission does not provide substance to fully address the Relevance Assessment criteria or may be unclear how is supports either what makes the author(s) or organization an authorative source, how the Source is relevant to the Contingency Plan Project

0 pts

No Evidence

Student submission does not meet the Relevance Assessment criteria

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Validation

Source Validation -Is the source peer-reviewed, scholarly in nature or a publisher that uses editors to ensure a quality publication? -Accuracy, where are they getting their information from (e.g., does it have citations & references, are they explaining where they got their data from)?

8 pts

Meets or Exceeds

Student submission clearly and completely address whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly or publisher with editors for quality & the accuracy of the information

6 pts

In Progress

Student submission mostly addresses whether source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & accuracy of the information

3 pts

Little Evidence

Student submission does not provide substance to validate if source is peer-reviewed, scholarly, published with editors for quality & identifying the accuracy of the information

0 pts

No Evidence

Student submission does not meet the Source Validation criteria

8 pts

Total Points: 20

Previous Next

Top