ST3003 AS
2 years ago 50
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
Rubric_.pdf
ST3003AssessmentTemplate.docx
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
INSTRUCTIONS:
All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.
This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files. The first file is completed on the provided template and includes the two parts. Save your file as follows:
· ST3003_firstinitial_lastname _ project (e.g., ST3003_J_Smith)
The second file should is your excel file where all computations are completed for the assessment. Save this file as
· ST3003_firstinitial_lastname_excelwork (e.g., ST3003_J_Smith)
Rubric_.pdf
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XA3004: Health Equity Advocacy and Political Engagement: Analyze the impact of civic engagement on health equity.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Health Equity and Political Engagement
Using the Walden College of Nursing Writing Template, construct a 2- to 3-page paper in which you do the following:
• Identify political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization.
Learning Objective 1.3: Assess opportunities to advocate for and advance health equity within practice or community settings Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze professional nursing organizations and their efforts to promote health equity
The response comprehensively and clearly identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
The response identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies political and/or civic engagement in a professional nursing organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support identification, or it is missing.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
• Describe the connection to health equity and the impact of the organization.
Learning Objective 1.3: Assess opportunities to advocate for and advance health equity within practice or community settings Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze professional nursing organizations and their efforts to promote health equity
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
The response describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
Professional Writing Skills Assessment
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization and does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
ST3003AssessmentTemplate.docx
ST3003 Assessment Template
Prepared by: Replace this text with your name.
Date: Replace this text with the submission date.
Page 2 of 2
The Normal Distribution and Confidence Intervals
Part 1 — Confidence Intervals in Research
For this section, refer to the following article from the Walden Library:
References
Siamisang, K., Kebadiretse, D., Tjirare, L. T., Muyela, C., Gare, K., & Masupe, T. (2022). Prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety and stress among frontline healthcare workers at COVID-19 isolation sites in Gaborone, Botswana. PLoS ONE, 17(8), e0273052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273052
All articles are available in full text in the Walden Library, which you may search by title or DOI. Be sure to provide an explanation for each of your answers and include supporting evidence from the text and/or Learning Resources.
Write responses to address the following in paragraph form by inserting your answers directly beneath the questions.
Table 3 of the journal article displays the number of health care workers who report various levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. These numbers are presented as the number of workers as well as the percent of the total (447). Confidence intervals are given for each percentage value. Choose ONE level of either depression, anxiety, or stress (e.g., normal depression) to use to address the following questions:
1. Show how the given percentage was derived based on the sample data.
2. Write 1–2 sentences explaining how the confidence interval would be interpreted.
3. Based on this interval, provide one value that could be considered reasonable as the population proportion and one that would not be considered reasonable as the true population proportion. Fully explain your reasoning.
4. If a subsequent study was completed that increased the sample size to 1,000 participants, explain one change you would expect to see in the confidence intervals. Explain why you feel this change would occur.
Table 1 of this journal article provides a breakdown of characteristics of the 447 participants in this study. The number of participants is given, followed by the percentage in ().
1. Provide one reason you believe a confidence interval was not presented for this data.
Part 2 — Using the Normal Distribution
The following should be based on the data set you created from the larger BODY DATA (ST3001) data set complete the following table:
|
|
Smokers |
Nonsmokers |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
Standard deviation |
|
|
|
Sample size (n) |
|
|
Replace the questions below with your response to the following: Comment by Lisa Picozzi: Why should students replace the questions rather than simply answering them?
Use the table above to answer the following questions based on your individual data. For each question, write a 1-sentence explanation about how Excel was used to assist you in your computations.
1. Find the percent of smokers expected to have a BMI of greater than 25 (overweight).
2. Find the percent of nonsmokers expected to have a BMI of less than 18.5 (underweight).
3. A normal BMI range is between 18.5 and 24.9. What percent of smokers are expected to be within this range? What percent of nonsmokers are expected to be within this range?
4. A researcher is interested in which BMI represents the 90th percentile (90% are at this BMI level or lower). What BMI score represents the 90th percentile cut-off rate?
Part 3 — Creating Confidence Intervals
Use the table above when addressing the following.
Complete the following table:
|
Group |
90% confidence interval |
95% confidence interval |
99% confidence interval |
|
Smokers |
|
|
|
|
Nonsmokers |
|
|
|
Replace the questions below with your response to the following: Comment by Lisa Picozzi: Why should students replace the questions rather than simply answering them?
1. As the level of confidence increases, what happens to the width of the confidence interval? Does it increase or decrease? Explain one reason why this would happen.
2. Using the 95% confidence interval, compare the BMI of smokers vs. nonsmokers. Write a 2–3 sentence paragraph explaining whether these intervals overlap or not. What does that indicate about the differences in BMI between the two groups?
3. In 1–2 sentences, explain the following: What is one situation in which you as a researcher might choose a 99% confidence interval? A 90% interval? Fully justify your choices.
References
Include appropriately formatted references to scholarly sources to support the statements made in your report. Please refer to the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist for more information.
INSTRUCTIONS.docx
INSTRUCTIONS:
All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.
This Assessment requires submission of two (2) files. The first file is completed on the provided template and includes the two parts. Save your file as follows:
· ST3003_firstinitial_lastname _ project (e.g., ST3003_J_Smith)
The second file should is your excel file where all computations are completed for the assessment. Save this file as
· ST3003_firstinitial_lastname_excelwork (e.g., ST3003_J_Smith)
Rubric_.pdf
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 1
XA3004: Health Equity Advocacy and Political Engagement: Analyze the impact of civic engagement on health equity.
Assessment Rubric
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
Module 1: Health Equity and Political Engagement
Using the Walden College of Nursing Writing Template, construct a 2- to 3-page paper in which you do the following:
• Identify political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization.
Learning Objective 1.3: Assess opportunities to advocate for and advance health equity within practice or community settings Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze professional nursing organizations and their efforts to promote health equity
The response comprehensively and clearly identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
The response identifies political and civic engagement in a professional nursing organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies political and/or civic engagement in a professional nursing organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support identification, or it is missing.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 2
Rubric Criteria Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
• Describe the connection to health equity and the impact of the organization.
Learning Objective 1.3: Assess opportunities to advocate for and advance health equity within practice or community settings Learning Objective 1.5: Analyze professional nursing organizations and their efforts to promote health equity
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the description.
The response describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the description.
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the connection between health equity and the impact of the organization, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the description, or it is missing.
Professional Writing Skills Assessment
Professional Writing Masters Expectations Achieves Expectations Does not Meet Expectations
Context, Organization, Audience, Purpose, Tone, Style, Clarity, Flow
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is consistently clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias.
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with adequate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias.
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose. Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization and does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
© 2024 Walden University, LLC 3
Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
Writing fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
Writing does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references in APA format.
ST3003AssessmentTemplate.docx
ST3003 Assessment Template
Prepared by: Replace this text with your name.
Date: Replace this text with the submission date.
Page 2 of 2
The Normal Distribution and Confidence Intervals
Part 1 — Confidence Intervals in Research
For this section, refer to the following article from the Walden Library:
References
Siamisang, K., Kebadiretse, D., Tjirare, L. T., Muyela, C., Gare, K., & Masupe, T. (2022). Prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety and stress among frontline healthcare workers at COVID-19 isolation sites in Gaborone, Botswana. PLoS ONE, 17(8), e0273052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273052
All articles are available in full text in the Walden Library, which you may search by title or DOI. Be sure to provide an explanation for each of your answers and include supporting evidence from the text and/or Learning Resources.
Write responses to address the following in paragraph form by inserting your answers directly beneath the questions.
Table 3 of the journal article displays the number of health care workers who report various levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. These numbers are presented as the number of workers as well as the percent of the total (447). Confidence intervals are given for each percentage value. Choose ONE level of either depression, anxiety, or stress (e.g., normal depression) to use to address the following questions:
1. Show how the given percentage was derived based on the sample data.
2. Write 1–2 sentences explaining how the confidence interval would be interpreted.
3. Based on this interval, provide one value that could be considered reasonable as the population proportion and one that would not be considered reasonable as the true population proportion. Fully explain your reasoning.
4. If a subsequent study was completed that increased the sample size to 1,000 participants, explain one change you would expect to see in the confidence intervals. Explain why you feel this change would occur.
Table 1 of this journal article provides a breakdown of characteristics of the 447 participants in this study. The number of participants is given, followed by the percentage in ().
1. Provide one reason you believe a confidence interval was not presented for this data.
Part 2 — Using the Normal Distribution
The following should be based on the data set you created from the larger BODY DATA (ST3001) data set complete the following table:
|
|
Smokers |
Nonsmokers |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
Standard deviation |
|
|
|
Sample size (n) |
|
|
Replace the questions below with your response to the following: Comment by Lisa Picozzi: Why should students replace the questions rather than simply answering them?
Use the table above to answer the following questions based on your individual data. For each question, write a 1-sentence explanation about how Excel was used to assist you in your computations.
1. Find the percent of smokers expected to have a BMI of greater than 25 (overweight).
2. Find the percent of nonsmokers expected to have a BMI of less than 18.5 (underweight).
3. A normal BMI range is between 18.5 and 24.9. What percent of smokers are expected to be within this range? What percent of nonsmokers are expected to be within this range?
4. A researcher is interested in which BMI represents the 90th percentile (90% are at this BMI level or lower). What BMI score represents the 90th percentile cut-off rate?
Part 3 — Creating Confidence Intervals
Use the table above when addressing the following.
Complete the following table:
|
Group |
90% confidence interval |
95% confidence interval |
99% confidence interval |
|
Smokers |
|
|
|
|
Nonsmokers |
|
|
|
Replace the questions below with your response to the following: Comment by Lisa Picozzi: Why should students replace the questions rather than simply answering them?
1. As the level of confidence increases, what happens to the width of the confidence interval? Does it increase or decrease? Explain one reason why this would happen.
2. Using the 95% confidence interval, compare the BMI of smokers vs. nonsmokers. Write a 2–3 sentence paragraph explaining whether these intervals overlap or not. What does that indicate about the differences in BMI between the two groups?
3. In 1–2 sentences, explain the following: What is one situation in which you as a researcher might choose a 99% confidence interval? A 90% interval? Fully justify your choices.
References
Include appropriately formatted references to scholarly sources to support the statements made in your report. Please refer to the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist for more information.
- 4 pages. 100% NO PLAGARISM!! APA FORMAT. Cost of health care.
- Research paper about (The Development of Autopilot and how it Increase Aviation Safety)
- 21321432rter3r32
- Week 7 Assignment
- I need a Conversation Report
- Research paper for "Human Factors in Aviation Safety" Class
- Application of Cross-Cultural Psychology Presentation
- Premises and Conclusions on Globalization*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial Use as Guide Paper*****
- h
- discussion 2