sister keeper
2 years ago 10
mysisterkeeper.docx
MysisterskeeperRubric1.doc
mysisterkeeper.docx
My Sisters Keeper Discussion
For this case study, I want you to post your opinions below. This should be at least 500 words. I have some prompts below to get you thinking, but you do not have to use these. I just wanted to help get you thinking. If you utilize a source, please cite it.
-What is the main ethical Dilemma?
-Do you agree with Anna's decision to sue her parents? If you were the judge, would you have made the same decision?
-Which character do you like the most? Who do you like the least? Why?
-Do you agree with Sara that Anna should give her sister a kidney?
-Do you think Sara is a good mother? Do you sympathize with her? How does her martyrdom affect the rest of the family?
-Did the movie end as you expected?
-What do YOU think YOU would do as the mom of Anna?
-Discuss the ways each family member copes with their situation. How are each of their identities affected by Kate? How does this affect Kate?
-Do you think it is ethical to have a "designer baby" like Anna was?
-Discuss the consequences of the trial other than the ruling. In what ways does it force people to deal with issues in their relationships? Sara and Brian? Anna and her parents? Julia and Campbell?
MysisterskeeperRubric1.doc
Name _____________________________
Rubric for Movie Review
|
|
Focus |
Details |
Summary |
Historical Analysis |
Grammar/Spelling |
|
|
Excellent (9-10) |
Your entire Discussion is about the movie. You have one opinion and you STICK TO IT! Everything is related to your opinion. |
You give a lot of details about the movie. You use a lot of examples from the movie to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists all major points in the movie but does not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers all the major points of interest. Sources are cited correctly. |
No spelling or grammar mistakes at all! Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
Good (8-7) |
Your entire discussion is about the movie. You have one opinion and you mostly stick to it! |
You give some details about the movie. You use some examples to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists most of the major points in the movie, does not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers most of the major points of interest. Sources are cited correctly |
1-2 mistakes, tops! Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
So So (6-5) |
Your opinion is obvious but you might reference other stuff (other movies, actors, etc…) |
You use some examples from the movie to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists most of the major points in the movie, may give away ending |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers some of the major points of interest. Sources are cited but not correctly. |
More than 3 grammar or spelling mistakes but less than 5. Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
Not So Hot (4-3) |
Your opinion might not be obvious. You basically just tell me what the movie is about. You miss the point of the assignment. |
You don’t use a lot of examples, but you do reference the movie in your support. |
Summary lists some of the major points in the movie, may or may not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy is only briefly covered or inaccurate. Sources are not cited correctly. |
More than 5 grammar or spelling mistakes but less than 10. Sentences might not be structure correctly. |
|
|
Poor (2-1) |
What was this assignment about? You aren’t quite sure…at least in your writing. |
You don’t use ANY details to support your point. (This movie was good because I liked it.) |
Summary lists a few of the major points in the movie, gives away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy is only briefly covered or is inaccurate. Sources not cited. |
More than 10 spelling mistakes, Sentences are not structured correctly. |
|
|
Late/Missing (0) |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
|
|
Points Achieved |
|
|
|
|
|
Total /50 |
COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
mysisterkeeper.docx
My Sisters Keeper Discussion
For this case study, I want you to post your opinions below. This should be at least 500 words. I have some prompts below to get you thinking, but you do not have to use these. I just wanted to help get you thinking. If you utilize a source, please cite it.
-What is the main ethical Dilemma?
-Do you agree with Anna's decision to sue her parents? If you were the judge, would you have made the same decision?
-Which character do you like the most? Who do you like the least? Why?
-Do you agree with Sara that Anna should give her sister a kidney?
-Do you think Sara is a good mother? Do you sympathize with her? How does her martyrdom affect the rest of the family?
-Did the movie end as you expected?
-What do YOU think YOU would do as the mom of Anna?
-Discuss the ways each family member copes with their situation. How are each of their identities affected by Kate? How does this affect Kate?
-Do you think it is ethical to have a "designer baby" like Anna was?
-Discuss the consequences of the trial other than the ruling. In what ways does it force people to deal with issues in their relationships? Sara and Brian? Anna and her parents? Julia and Campbell?
MysisterskeeperRubric1.doc
Name _____________________________
Rubric for Movie Review
|
|
Focus |
Details |
Summary |
Historical Analysis |
Grammar/Spelling |
|
|
Excellent (9-10) |
Your entire Discussion is about the movie. You have one opinion and you STICK TO IT! Everything is related to your opinion. |
You give a lot of details about the movie. You use a lot of examples from the movie to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists all major points in the movie but does not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers all the major points of interest. Sources are cited correctly. |
No spelling or grammar mistakes at all! Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
Good (8-7) |
Your entire discussion is about the movie. You have one opinion and you mostly stick to it! |
You give some details about the movie. You use some examples to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists most of the major points in the movie, does not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers most of the major points of interest. Sources are cited correctly |
1-2 mistakes, tops! Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
So So (6-5) |
Your opinion is obvious but you might reference other stuff (other movies, actors, etc…) |
You use some examples from the movie to emphasize your point. |
Summary lists most of the major points in the movie, may give away ending |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy covers some of the major points of interest. Sources are cited but not correctly. |
More than 3 grammar or spelling mistakes but less than 5. Sentences are all structured correctly. |
|
|
Not So Hot (4-3) |
Your opinion might not be obvious. You basically just tell me what the movie is about. You miss the point of the assignment. |
You don’t use a lot of examples, but you do reference the movie in your support. |
Summary lists some of the major points in the movie, may or may not give away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy is only briefly covered or inaccurate. Sources are not cited correctly. |
More than 5 grammar or spelling mistakes but less than 10. Sentences might not be structure correctly. |
|
|
Poor (2-1) |
What was this assignment about? You aren’t quite sure…at least in your writing. |
You don’t use ANY details to support your point. (This movie was good because I liked it.) |
Summary lists a few of the major points in the movie, gives away ending. |
Your analysis of the movie for historical accuracy is only briefly covered or is inaccurate. Sources not cited. |
More than 10 spelling mistakes, Sentences are not structured correctly. |
|
|
Late/Missing (0) |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
Late/Missing |
|
|
Points Achieved |
|
|
|
|
|
Total /50 |
COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- MSL 6040
- Lexicon, Inc.
- ACC 564 Week 10 Assignment 4 Changing the AIS
- asymmetric-key algorithm is called EIGamal
- Are you avaiable to complete assignment by 6/22/16 by 730 aneastern time 2-3 pages
- Decide whether this argument is successful or not. If you decide this essay is successful, discuss why. You may use the structure of the argument, the tone, and the various types of support (ethos, pathos, and logos) as proof of the argument’s success. Ma
- assignment
- Assignment 2: LASA # 1: Literature Review Paper
- five discussion questions (200 words each)
- how externalities may prevent market equilibrium and the various governments policies used to remedy the inefficiencies in markets caused by externalities