Project - literature review

Ellie177

see the attachments

a year ago
31.07.2025
45

Report issue

files (3)

Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx

W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx

4example_literature_.pdf

Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx

NR631 Nurse Educator Continuing

Graduate Experience

Research Summary Table Template

For Week 4 Review of Literature Assignment

Author (Date)	Design	Sample/ Setting	Findings	Measures (Outcomes)	Limitations/Evidence Level

NR631 W4 Research Summary Table Template

W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx

Week 4 Assignment: Review of the Literature

Guideline and Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in developing a research summary table and synthesis of the literature for the executive CGE project.

Course Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, you will address the following course learning outcomes:

CO 1: Apply evidence-based leadership skills and concepts in the planning of an executive-level practice change project. (PO 4, 5)

CO 2: Develop an evidence-based foundation to lead organizational change using current knowledge, standards of practice, and research from current literature. (PO 4, 5)

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 100 Points

MY PICOT QUESTION:

In adult patients on a med-surg unit (P), how does implementing purposeful hourly rounding by nursing staff (I), compared to no structured rounding (C), affect the incidence of patient falls (O) over 16 weeks (T)?

Project title; Purposeful rounding to reduce patient falls?

Assignment Overview

Begin your review of the literature by constructing a research summary table. You will use the research summary table to synthesize the literature on your intervention into the Review of the Literature paper.

Assignment Instructions

The following information should be included in this section of your proposal.

1. Research Summary Table

Collect a minimum of 10 current scholarly research studies related to your proposed executive CGE project intervention.

Use the Research Summary Table Template to develop your table. For each article/study that will be used in your paper, fill in the table in your own words.

2. Review of the Literature Paper

Examining your table column by column, identify major themes in your articles.

Use your major themes to organize your Review of the Literature under subheadings. You are likely to have two to five themes or subheadings.

Briefly summarize the major themes from your synthesis of the literature to end your review of the literature.

The paper should be 3-5 pages long, not including the title page, reference list, and Research Summary Table. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement.

Attach your Research Summary Table as an appendix at the end of the literature review, after the reference list, and label it “Appendix A, Research Summary Table.” Only one document should be submitted. Do not submit the paper and table separately.

Assignment Criteria

Assessment Criteria	Points	%	Description
Research Summary Table	20	20%	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue
Analysis of Articles	20	20%	Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations
Themes and Subheadings	10	10%	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings
Description of Each Theme	20	20%	Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme
Summary of Findings	20	20%	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation	5	5%	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors.
APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page	5	5%	Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors.
Total	100	100%	A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements.

NR 631: Nurse Executive Concluding Graduate Experience I

NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23

Grading Rubric

Assessment Criteria	Distinguished (100%)	Exceeds (92%)	Proficient (84%)	Needs Improvement (0%)
Research Summary Table	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least nine evidence-based articles on the intervention; one article is included on the executive problem or issue	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least eight evidence-based articles on the intervention; two articles are included on the executive problem or issue	Does not develop a Research Summary Table or includes less than eight evidence-based articles.
Analysis of Articles	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes 9 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes 8 of articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes fewer than 8 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations
Themes and Subheadings	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	0 Points
	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but a few of the themes are not described clearly	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but misses one or more important themes or summarizes articles without tying their results to a theme	Review of literature is a list of summaries of articles and does not reflect synthesis of the literature
Description of Each Theme	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme	Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but some areas are unclear	Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but half of the synthesis is unclear	Does not describe what was found in the literature about each theme but instead focuses on an article-by-article summary
Summary of Findings	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear and the summary is not related to the coming intervention and evaluation paper	Does not summarize what was found in the review of the literature
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	0 Points
	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than three to four errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are not used; assignment contains seven or more errors.
APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	0 Points
	Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors.	Proper APA format is used, with no more than three to four errors.	Proper APA format is used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors.	Assignment contains seven or more errors in APA format.

NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23

4example_literature_.pdf

This file is too large to display.View in new window

Weekk4_Research_Summary_Table_Template_JAN23.docx

NR631 Nurse Educator Continuing

Graduate Experience

Research Summary Table Template

For Week 4 Review of Literature Assignment

Author (Date)	Design	Sample/ Setting	Findings	Measures (Outcomes)	Limitations/Evidence Level

NR631 W4 Research Summary Table Template

W4_Review_of_Literature_Guideline_and_Rubric.docx

Week 4 Assignment: Review of the Literature

Guideline and Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to assist you in developing a research summary table and synthesis of the literature for the executive CGE project.

Course Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, you will address the following course learning outcomes:

CO 1: Apply evidence-based leadership skills and concepts in the planning of an executive-level practice change project. (PO 4, 5)

CO 2: Develop an evidence-based foundation to lead organizational change using current knowledge, standards of practice, and research from current literature. (PO 4, 5)

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 100 Points

MY PICOT QUESTION:

Project title; Purposeful rounding to reduce patient falls?

Assignment Overview

Assignment Instructions

The following information should be included in this section of your proposal.

1. Research Summary Table

Collect a minimum of 10 current scholarly research studies related to your proposed executive CGE project intervention.

Use the Research Summary Table Template to develop your table. For each article/study that will be used in your paper, fill in the table in your own words.

2. Review of the Literature Paper

Examining your table column by column, identify major themes in your articles.

Use your major themes to organize your Review of the Literature under subheadings. You are likely to have two to five themes or subheadings.

Briefly summarize the major themes from your synthesis of the literature to end your review of the literature.

The paper should be 3-5 pages long, not including the title page, reference list, and Research Summary Table. This is an estimate to guide you and not a strict requirement.

Assignment Criteria

Assessment Criteria	Points	%	Description
Research Summary Table	20	20%	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue
Analysis of Articles	20	20%	Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations
Themes and Subheadings	10	10%	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings
Description of Each Theme	20	20%	Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme
Summary of Findings	20	20%	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation	5	5%	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors.
APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page	5	5%	Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors.
Total	100	100%	A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements.

NR 631: Nurse Executive Concluding Graduate Experience I

NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23

Grading Rubric

Assessment Criteria	Distinguished (100%)	Exceeds (92%)	Proficient (84%)	Needs Improvement (0%)
Research Summary Table	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least 10 evidence-based articles on the intervention and not the executive problem or issue	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least nine evidence-based articles on the intervention; one article is included on the executive problem or issue	Develops a Research Summary Table featuring at least eight evidence-based articles on the intervention; two articles are included on the executive problem or issue	Does not develop a Research Summary Table or includes less than eight evidence-based articles.
Analysis of Articles	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Analyzes all of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes 9 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes 8 of articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations	Analyzes fewer than 8 of the articles in the table accurately with respect to design, sample/setting, findings, outcome measures, and limitations
Themes and Subheadings	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	0 Points
	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table and uses the themes for subheadings	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but a few of the themes are not described clearly	Identifies several themes emerging from the research summary table but misses one or more important themes or summarizes articles without tying their results to a theme	Review of literature is a list of summaries of articles and does not reflect synthesis of the literature
Description of Each Theme	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Thoroughly describes what was found in the literature about each theme	Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but some areas are unclear	Describes what was found in the literature about each theme but half of the synthesis is unclear	Does not describe what was found in the literature about each theme but instead focuses on an article-by-article summary
Summary of Findings	20 Points	18 Points	16 Points	0 Points
	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature and relates them to the intervention and evaluation	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear	Summarizes the major themes in the Review of Literature but portions of the summary are unclear and the summary is not related to the coming intervention and evaluation paper	Does not summarize what was found in the review of the literature
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, and Punctuation	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	0 Points
	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than one to two errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used, with no more than three to four errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors.	Proper grammar, spelling syntax, and punctuation are not used; assignment contains seven or more errors.
APA Title Page, Citations, and Reference Page	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	0 Points
	Proper APA format is used, with no more than one to two errors.	Proper APA format is used, with no more than three to four errors.	Proper APA format is used to some extent, with no more than five to six errors.	Assignment contains seven or more errors in APA format.

NR631 W4 Review of Literature Guideline and Rubric JAN23

4example_literature_.pdf

This file is too large to display.View in new window

other Questions(10)