Project
instructions attached two articles, two separate reviews using the template attached and the articles attached
3 years ago 25
instructions.doc
QualitativeReview.docx
SystematicReview-1.docx
instructions.doc
QualitativeReview.docx
APPENDIX E
Appraisal Guide
Findings of a Qualitative Study
Citation:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Synopsis
What experience, situation, or subculture does the researcher seek to understand?
Does the researcher want to produce a description of an experience, a social process, or an event, or is the goal to generate a theory?
How was data collected?
How did the researcher control his or her biases and preconceptions?
Are specific pieces of data (e.g., direct quotes) and more generalized statements (themes, theories) included in the report?
What are the main findings of the study?
Credibility
Is the study published in a source that required peer review? Yes No Not clear
Were the methods used appropriate to the study purpose? Yes No Not clear
Was the sampling of observations or interviews appropriate and varied enough to serve the purpose of the study? Yes No Not clear
*Were data collection methods effective in obtaining in-depth data? Yes No Not clear
Did the data collection methods avoid the possibility of oversight, underrepresentation, or overrepresentation from certain types of sources? Yes No Not clear
Were data collection and analysis intermingled in a dynamic way? Yes No Not clear
*Is the data presented in ways that provide a vivid portrayal of what was experienced or happened and its context? Yes No Not clear
*Does the data provided justify generalized statements, themes, or theory? Yes No Not clear
Are the findings credible? Yes All Yes Some No
Clinical Significance
*Are the findings rich and informative? Yes No Not clear
*Is the perspective provided potentially useful in providing insight, support, or guidance for assessing patient status or progress? Yes Some No Not clear
Are the findings clinically significant? Yes All Yes Some No
* = Important criteria
Comments
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
APP E-2 Brown
Brown APP E-1
SystematicReview-1.docx
APPENDIX C
Appraisal Guide
Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis
Citation:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Synopsis
What organization or persons produced the systematic review (SR)?
How many persons were involved in conducting the review?
What topic or question did the SR address?
How were potential research reports identified?
What determined if a study was included in the analysis?
How many studies were included in the review?
What research designs were used in the studies?
What were the consistent and important across-studies conclusions?
Credibility
Was the topic clearly defined? Yes No Not clear
Was the search for studies and other evidence comprehensive and unbiased? Yes No Not clear
Was the screening of citations for inclusion based on explicit criteria? Yes No Not clear
*Were the included studies assessed for quality? Yes No Not clear
Were the design characteristics and findings of the included studies displayed or discussed in sufficient detail? Yes No Not clear
*Was there a true integration (i.e., synthesis) of the findings—not merely reporting of findings from each study individually? Yes No Not clear
*Did the reviewers explore why differences in findings might have occurred? Yes No Not clear
Did the reviewers distinguish between conclusions based on consistent findings from several good studies and those based on inferior evidence (number or quality)? Yes No Not clear
Which conclusions were supported by consistent findings from two or more good or high-quality studies? List
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Are the conclusions credible? Yes All Yes Some No
Clinical Significance
*Across studies, is the size of the treatment or the strength of the association found or the meaningfulness of qualitative findings strong enough to make a difference in patient outcomes or experiences of care? Yes No Not clear
Are the conclusions relevant to the care the nurse gives? Yes No Not clear
Are the conclusions clinically significant? Yes All Yes Some No
Applicability
Does the SR address a problem, situation, or decision we are addressing in our setting? Yes No Not clear
Are the patients in the studies or a subgroup of patients in the studies similar to those we see? Yes No Not clear
What changes, additions, training, or purchases would be needed to implement and sustain a clinical protocol based on these conclusions? Specify and list
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Is what we will have to do to implement the new protocol realistically achievable by us (resources, capability, commitment)? Yes No Not clear
How will we know if our patients are benefiting from our new protocol? Specify
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Are these conclusions applicable to our setting? Yes All Yes Some No
Should we proceed to design a protocol incorporating these conclusions? Yes All Yes Some No
* = Important criteria
Comments
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
APP C-2 Brown
Brown APP C-1
instructions.doc
QualitativeReview.docx
APPENDIX E
Appraisal Guide
Findings of a Qualitative Study
Citation:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Synopsis
What experience, situation, or subculture does the researcher seek to understand?
Does the researcher want to produce a description of an experience, a social process, or an event, or is the goal to generate a theory?
How was data collected?
How did the researcher control his or her biases and preconceptions?
Are specific pieces of data (e.g., direct quotes) and more generalized statements (themes, theories) included in the report?
What are the main findings of the study?
Credibility
Is the study published in a source that required peer review? Yes No Not clear
Were the methods used appropriate to the study purpose? Yes No Not clear
Was the sampling of observations or interviews appropriate and varied enough to serve the purpose of the study? Yes No Not clear
*Were data collection methods effective in obtaining in-depth data? Yes No Not clear
Did the data collection methods avoid the possibility of oversight, underrepresentation, or overrepresentation from certain types of sources? Yes No Not clear
Were data collection and analysis intermingled in a dynamic way? Yes No Not clear
*Is the data presented in ways that provide a vivid portrayal of what was experienced or happened and its context? Yes No Not clear
*Does the data provided justify generalized statements, themes, or theory? Yes No Not clear
Are the findings credible? Yes All Yes Some No
Clinical Significance
*Are the findings rich and informative? Yes No Not clear
*Is the perspective provided potentially useful in providing insight, support, or guidance for assessing patient status or progress? Yes Some No Not clear
Are the findings clinically significant? Yes All Yes Some No
* = Important criteria
Comments
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
APP E-2 Brown
Brown APP E-1
SystematicReview-1.docx
APPENDIX C
Appraisal Guide
Conclusions of a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis
Citation:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Synopsis
What organization or persons produced the systematic review (SR)?
How many persons were involved in conducting the review?
What topic or question did the SR address?
How were potential research reports identified?
What determined if a study was included in the analysis?
How many studies were included in the review?
What research designs were used in the studies?
What were the consistent and important across-studies conclusions?
Credibility
Was the topic clearly defined? Yes No Not clear
Was the search for studies and other evidence comprehensive and unbiased? Yes No Not clear
Was the screening of citations for inclusion based on explicit criteria? Yes No Not clear
*Were the included studies assessed for quality? Yes No Not clear
Were the design characteristics and findings of the included studies displayed or discussed in sufficient detail? Yes No Not clear
*Was there a true integration (i.e., synthesis) of the findings—not merely reporting of findings from each study individually? Yes No Not clear
*Did the reviewers explore why differences in findings might have occurred? Yes No Not clear
Did the reviewers distinguish between conclusions based on consistent findings from several good studies and those based on inferior evidence (number or quality)? Yes No Not clear
Which conclusions were supported by consistent findings from two or more good or high-quality studies? List
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Are the conclusions credible? Yes All Yes Some No
Clinical Significance
*Across studies, is the size of the treatment or the strength of the association found or the meaningfulness of qualitative findings strong enough to make a difference in patient outcomes or experiences of care? Yes No Not clear
Are the conclusions relevant to the care the nurse gives? Yes No Not clear
Are the conclusions clinically significant? Yes All Yes Some No
Applicability
Does the SR address a problem, situation, or decision we are addressing in our setting? Yes No Not clear
Are the patients in the studies or a subgroup of patients in the studies similar to those we see? Yes No Not clear
What changes, additions, training, or purchases would be needed to implement and sustain a clinical protocol based on these conclusions? Specify and list
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Is what we will have to do to implement the new protocol realistically achievable by us (resources, capability, commitment)? Yes No Not clear
How will we know if our patients are benefiting from our new protocol? Specify
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Are these conclusions applicable to our setting? Yes All Yes Some No
Should we proceed to design a protocol incorporating these conclusions? Yes All Yes Some No
* = Important criteria
Comments
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
APP C-2 Brown
Brown APP C-1
- Teaching tools for each subject
- Need help with a writing assignment for Statistics
- can someone please have this back to me by sunday?
- Read an article then write an analysis and respond essay
- The sample mean is 66, and the sample size is 32
- 6 asap
- Explain why there is an inverse relationship between the price of bonds and the relevant interest rate. Explain the effect of each of the following upon interest rates and upon the price of bonds:
- Biochemistry Lab report
- case
- BSHS 452 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Assessment Process and Needs Problem Statement