PrincipalsofLeadershipW1
2 years ago 3
PrincipalsofLeadershipW1.docx
RubricW1.docx
PrincipalsofLeadershipW1.docx
Comparison of Leaders
Choose two well-known leaders. Compare and contrast the traits, motives, and or characteristics of each leader. In a 2-3 page paper, describe how those characteristics may have influenced their leadership style. Cite three sources outside of the textbook to support your position.
Your week 1 assignment rubric is included in the assignment details page, or you may also click on the "See Rubric" button at the top of your dropbox page to view how the instructor will grade your assignment. Assignment dropboxes are available by clicking on the module link above
RubricW1.docx
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: Written Assignment Rubric
|
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Developing |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
|
Comprehension of Assignment |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Addressed the majority of the question(s). |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Did not address the question(s). |
|
Application of Course Knowledge and Content |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. |
|
Organization of Ideas |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
|
Writing Skills |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. |
|
Research Skills |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) No evidence of resources apparent. |
Name: Written Assignment Rubric
PrincipalsofLeadershipW1.docx
Comparison of Leaders
Choose two well-known leaders. Compare and contrast the traits, motives, and or characteristics of each leader. In a 2-3 page paper, describe how those characteristics may have influenced their leadership style. Cite three sources outside of the textbook to support your position.
Your week 1 assignment rubric is included in the assignment details page, or you may also click on the "See Rubric" button at the top of your dropbox page to view how the instructor will grade your assignment. Assignment dropboxes are available by clicking on the module link above
RubricW1.docx
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: Written Assignment Rubric
|
|
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Developing |
Beginning |
Inadequate |
|
Comprehension of Assignment |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Addressed the question completely and thoroughly. Provided additional supporting evidence, demonstrating a full comprehension of subject matter. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Addressed the question(s) completely and thoroughly. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Addressed the majority of the question(s). |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Addressed minimal portions of the question(s). |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Did not address the question(s). |
|
Application of Course Knowledge and Content |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Thorough technical application of course knowledge and content in a complete and concise manner. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is mostly accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is partially accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is minimally accurate, concise and complete. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Technical application of course knowledge and content is inaccurate and incomplete. |
|
Organization of Ideas |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order throughout the entire assignment. Includes adequate and appropriate supporting evidence. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Original ideas are effectively developed and presented in a logical, sequential order within a majority of the assignment. Includes acceptable supporting evidence |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Original ideas are partially developed and presented in a somewhat logical, sequential order. Inadequate supporting evidence. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Original ideas are not present and/or not presented in a logical, sequential order. Organization is difficult to follow throughout the assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Little to no original ideas or organization present throughout the entire assignment. Lacks supporting evidence. |
|
Writing Skills |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are flawless, including proficient demonstration of citations and formatting throughout the entire assignment. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) are accurate including demonstration of citations and formatting within a majority of the assignment. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Partial errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation) including demonstration of citations and formatting within minimal portions of the assignment. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation), inaccurate demonstration of citations and formatting. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) Assignment is incomprehensible due to multiple errors with mechanics (spelling, grammar, and punctuation). No demonstration of citations or formatting present. |
|
Research Skills |
Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Accurate and applicable use of resources relevant to the subject matter that enhance the overall assignment. |
Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Appropriate use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:14 (14.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Adequate use of resources, not all resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 13 (13.00%) Minimal use of resources relevant to the subject matter. |
Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11 (11.00%) No evidence of resources apparent. |
Name: Written Assignment Rubric
- PCN 520 Week 4 Groups in Action Workbook - Evolution of a Group (Segments 4-5)
- FEMA Reflection paper
- religion homework
- Fully discuss Intimate Partner Abuse and stalking
- 4.0
- mtk 2
- HELP WITH ALEKS
- The Boston Tea Party
- What is the largest tidal range in Figure 3. Boston, Massachusetts? Figure 3. Boston, Massachusetts tidal data for 11/2013 to 12/2013
- Assignment 3 Creating Training Tools - Employee Strengths in Decision Making Strategies*****A++ Rated Tutorial Already***** Use as a Guide Paper*****