Prevention Health Campaign

Assignment Description:

Prevention Health Campaign Essay 

Write a 1500-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least four (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word count. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

For this week’s assignment, please use the following instructions:

· Go to your State Public Health Department website and identify one primary prevention health campaign that has been implemented and evaluated in your state of residence.

· Once you have identified one primary prevention health campaign, share in one to two succinct paragraphs the findings and outcomes of the campaign.

· In addition, please describe the challenges and/or opportunities evidenced in this campaign.

· Furthermore, list the formative and summative evaluation methods to determine the efficacy or ineffectiveness of the campaign.

· Lastly, identify and discuss at least two approaches that would enhance the implementation of the campaign. For example, you may discuss how including an Advisory Board to guide the implementation of the campaign may enhance programmatic and/or operational outcomes.

Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

1. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

2. The following specifications are required for this assignment:

3. Length: 1500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

4. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word count for this assignment.

5. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

6. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY. Scholarly articles from 2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.

Learning Materials

References

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021).  Population health:  Creating A culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapter 1.

Additional

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015).  Priorities of the

National Quality Strategy.   http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr15/priorities.html 

 

Kulbok, P. A., Thatcher, E., Park, E., & Meszaros, P. S. (2012). Evolving

Public Health Nursing Roles: Focus on Community Participatory Health Promotion and Prevention.  The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17.   https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-17-2012/number-2-may-2012/evolving-public-health-nursing-roles/ 

 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022).  Healthy People

2030.   www.health.gov/healthypeople 

…

9/9/26, 10:36 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspe…

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Graduate Formal Research Paper Rubric v1

Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care

Criteria

Does Not Meet

0

%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Introduction

/Thesis

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

Quality of

Information

or Evidence

Weight:

%

25

/ 25

0

points

Weak or no in

-

troduction of

topic. Purpose

is

unclear/thesis

is weak or

missing.

7

points

Basic introduc

-

tion that states

topic but lacks

interest. Thesis

is somewhat

clear and

arguable.

8

points

Proficient in

-

troduction that

is interesting

and states

topic. Thesis is

clear and ar

-

guable state

-

ment of

position.

10

points

Exceptional in

-

troduction that

grabs interest

of reader and

states topic;

Thesis is ex

-

ceptionally

clear, arguable,

well-devel

-

oped, and a de

-

finitive

statement.

0

points

Information

has little or

nothing to do

with the thesis.

Information

has weak or no

connection to

the thesis.

17.5

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic, but

few details

and/or exam

-

ples are given.

Indicates a lim

-

ited variety of

sources.

20

points

Information re

-

lates to the

main topic.

Paper is re

-

searched in

sufficient detail

and from a va

-

riety of

sources. All

necessary con

-

tent is

included.

25

points

Paper is excep

-

tionally re

-

searched, ex

-

tremely de

-

tailed, and ac

-

curate.

Information

clearly relates

to the thesis.

Appropriate

content is cov

-

ered in depth

without being

redundant.

Criterion Score

Support of

Thesis/Anal

ysis Weight:

%

20

/ 20

Organizatio

n/

Developme

nt of Thesis

Weight:

15

%

/ 15

Conclusion

Weight: 5%

/ 5

0

points

Limited or no

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Lacks

analysis.

points

14

Some connec

-

tions have

been made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis, though

they may be

tenuous.

Minimal analy

-

sis is evident,

but may not

provide needed

support for

thesis.

16

points

Consistent

connections

made between

evidence and

thesis. Analysis

sufficiently

supports

thesis.

points

20

Exceptionally

critical, rele

-

vant, and con

-

sistent connec

-

tions made be

-

tween evi

-

dence and the

-

sis. Excellent

analysis is

evident.

0

points

Lacks develop

-

ment of ideas

with weak or

no transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

10.5

points

Somewhat

clear develop

-

ment, though

perhaps illogi

-

cal, with basic

transitions be

-

tween and

within

paragraphs.

12

points

Clear and logi

-

cal order that

supports thesis

with appropri

-

ate transitions

between and

within

paragraphs.

points

15

Exceptionally

clear, logical,

mature, and

thorough de

-

velopment of

thesis with ex

-

cellent transi

-

tions between

and within

paragraphs.

points

0

Lacks a sum

-

mary of topic.

Conclusions

missing or

irrelevant.

3.5

points

Basic summary

of topic with

-

out final con

-

cluding ideas.

Inappropriately

introduces new

information.

4

points

Good summary

of topic with

credible con

-

cluding ideas.

Introduces no

new

information.

points

5

Excellent sum

-

mary of topic

with succinct

and precise

concluding

ideas that im

-

pact reader.

Criterion Score

Quality of

Written

Communica

tion Weight:

15

%

/ 15

0

points

Style and voice

inappropriate

or do not ad

-

dress given au

-

dience, pur

-

pose, etc.

Word choice is

excessively re

-

dundant,

clichéd, and

unspecific.

Inconsistent

grammar, spell

-

ing, punctua

-

tion, and para

-

graphing.

Surface errors

are pervasive

enough that

they impede

communication

of meaning.

points

10.5

Style and voice

are somewhat

appropriate to

given audience

and purpose.

Word choice is

often unspe

-

cific, generic,

redundant, and

clichéd.

Repetitive me

-

chanical errors

distract the

reader.

Inconsistencies

in language,

sentence struc

-

ture, and/or

word choice

are present.

points

12

Style and voice

are appropriate

to the given

audience and

purpose. Word

choice is spe

-

cific and pur

-

poseful, and

somewhat var

-

ied throughout.

Minimal me

-

chanical or ty

-

pographical er

-

rors are

present, but

are not overly

distracting to

the reader.

Correct sen

-

tence structure

and audience-

appropriate

language are

used.

points

15

Style and voice

are not only

appropriate to

the given audi

-

ence and pur

-

pose, but also

show original

-

ity and creativ

-

ity. Word

choice is spe

-

cific, purpose

-

ful, dynamic

and varied.

Free of me

-

chanical and

typographical

errors. A vari

-

ety of sentence

structures and

effective fig

-

ures of speech

are used.

Writer is

clearly in com

-

mand of stan

-

dard, written,

academic

English.

Total

/ 100

Criterion Score

APA Format

Weight:

%

10

/ 10

0

points

APA format

and style are

not evident.

7

points

Missing APA el

-

ements; in-text

citations,

where neces

-

sary, are used

but formatted

inaccurately

and not

referenced.

8

points

All key ele

-

ments of an

APA title page

are present; In-

text citations

and a reference

page are

present with

few format er

-

rors.

Mechanics of

writing are re

-

flective of APA

style.

points

10

A broad under

-

standing of

APA format

and style is evi

-

dent. Accurate

citations and

references are

presented. No

APA errors are

evident.

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

70

points minimum

Level 3

80

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459337/View 1/4

1/4