POL_PPP
3 years ago 25
POL_PPP.docx
ExamplePowerPointPresentation2.pptx
ExamplePowerPointPresentation1.pptx
POL_PPP.docx
POL 2302 American State and Local Politics PPP
Unit III PowerPoint Presentation
Students will create a PowerPoint on state politics with no less than 10 content slides.
Using the U.S. state of your choice, create a PowerPoint presentation identifying the state's election and campaign processes, summarizing party politics and influences in the state, and identifying key political leadership positions at the local and state levels. Identify how state and local elected offices interact and are intertwined with the broader U.S. federal system.
Some ideas for additional details to include about your chosen state:
· types of primaries utilized,
· apportioning and districting information,
· gerrymandering, and
· important party or government issues.
Please do not copy and paste lists of senators and representatives into your slides. Use your creativity and organize the material in a logical, engaging, and understandable manner.
The PowerPoint should be a minimum of 10 slides in length, excluding the title and reference slides. Incorporate images, photos, charts, and graphics to support your information. Use bullet points rather than long paragraphs of text on your slides.
Use APA Style to properly cite graphics and paraphrased or quoted material. You must use at least three academic or government sources (excluding graphics) to support your presentation. Utilize the CSU Online Library for at least one of your sources.
ExamplePowerPointPresentation2.pptx
Civil Liberties Versus Civil Rights
Student Name
Columbia Southern University
Unit II
1
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court in the last two years
Leader of Civil Liberties
Civil Rights
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005 continued
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court in the last two years
Leader of Civil Rights
Supreme Court Influence
Supreme Court Influence continued
The Status of Equal Rights Today
References
Presentation Overview
2
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties are the rights of individuals to a free society. The protection from the government (Patterson, 2013).
The Fourteenth Amendment protects people’s rights from the actions of the state and local governments (Patterson, 2013).
For example- freedom from slavery, speech, forced labor, and due process of law (Patterson, 2013).
Known as the Bill of Rights.
3
3
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
In 1833, the Bill of Right was only applied to the actions of the national government (Patterson, 2013).
Challenged in the case of Barron v. Baltimore.
First ten amendments contain no expression of the intention to the state governments (Patterson, 2013).
In 1969 the Supreme Court Ruled.
Adults watch and read in their homes will not be consider a crime (Patterson, 2013).
4
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court in the Last Two Years
In 2016 Henry MONTGOMERY, v. LOUISIANA (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016).
The Court held that a juvenile convicted of a homicide could not be sentenced to life in prison without parole.
Montgomery murder Charles Hurt a deputy sheriff in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Supreme Court turnedover his conviction because public bias had prevented a fair trial (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016).
5
5
Leader of Civil Liberties
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Susan N. Herman was elected President of the American Civil Liberties Union in October 2008.
Mrs. Herman served on the ACLU National Board of Directors for twenty years.
She was a member of the Executive Committee for sixteen years (Susan N. Herman, n.d.).
6
Photo (c) Susan N. Herman. (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.aclu.org/bio/susan-n-herman
6
Civil Rights
Civil rights address the question of people from differing groups.
Racial
Ethnic
Gender
How are they to be treated equally by the government (Patterson, 2013).
The law refers to people first and their groups second (Patterson, 2013).
7
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
In 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
Supreme Court ruled that having distinct restrooms for singular races did not violate the Constitution but, both restrooms had to be the same (Patterson, 2013).
8
In 1971 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Board of Education
Supreme Court authorized to approve that busing kids to schools outside their neighborhoods for racially combined schools (Patterson, 2013).
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005 continued
9
In 2016 UTAH, v. Edward Joseph STRIEFF, Jr. (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Narcotics detective Douglas Fackrell conducted an investigation on a residence based on a tip about drug activity.
After watching Edward Strieff leave the residence.
Officer Fackrell detained Strieff.
Strieff had a warrant for a traffic infraction.
After searched him, the officer found methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia.
Strieff moved to overturn the evidence, claiming that it was originated from an unlawful investigatory stop (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Evidence taken was incident to a lawful arrest (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court in the Last Two Years
10
10
Nelson Mandela
South African politician.
Served as the President of South Africa.
He focused on getting rid of racism, poverty, and inequality.
He received the Nobel Peace Award
(Stubborn sense of fairness, 2016)
Leader of Civil Rights
11
11
The Constitution clarifies equal rights only in the general terms.
The Supreme Court has been tasked with how these constitutional assurances apply to specific situations.
Some of the Supreme Court decisions has supported and increased equal rights, while other decisions have restricted equal rights (Patterson, 2013).
Supreme Court Influence
12
The minority groups had a long struggle with the Supreme Court because of the fact the minority groups did not have a voice (Patterson, 2013).
People started to see how the minority group was being mistreated, because of the protests in Birmingham, Alabama where the minority groups were attacked by police dogs (Patterson, 2013).
Supreme Court Influence Continued
13
The various amendments to the Constitution guarantee freedom but, we still have a long way to go involving true equal rights for all (Patterson, 2013).
Today minority group are still battling for equal rights (Patterson, 2013).
Education Inequality
Equal Rights for Homosexuals
Voter ID Laws
The Status of Equal Rights Today
14
Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 - Supreme Court 2016
Patterson, T. (2013). The American democracy (11th ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Stubborn sense of fairness: Nelson Mandela's life-long struggle for peace and equality. (2016, October 03). Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://historycooperative.org/nelson-mandela/
Susan N. Herman. (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.aclu.org/bio/susan-n-herman
Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056 - Supreme Court 2016
References
15
image1.jpeg
image2.jpeg
image3.jpeg
image4.png
image5.jpeg
image6.jpeg
image7.jpeg
image8.jpeg
image9.png
image10.jpeg
image11.png
image12.jpeg
image13.jpeg
ExamplePowerPointPresentation1.pptx
Jane doe
Columbia Southern University
Google Innovations
Table of Contents
Google Home
R&D: Lead Users and Market Research
Culture and Structure Supporting Innovation
Google Home Inspired Inventions
Analysis of Future Innovations
Google Innovation SWOT Analysis
Google Invention SWOT Analysis
Benchmarking
Five Year Product Demand
Conclusion
Google Home Description
Voice-Activated Speaker (Google, 2017)
Uses Google Assistant
Connects to Wi-Fi
Answers questions
Task management
Day planner
Controls systems in home
Interacts with Smart devices
Plays music
Plays movies
Plays games
Google Home (Sofge, 2017)
R&D: Lead Users & Market Research
Lead Users
Help discover market needs (Zenios, 2016)
Identify product usability during development
Help pinpoint needed and useful product features
Input decreases time from development to market
Market Research
Recognize consumer expectations (Kubyshyna & Sergii, 2007)
Detect changes in consumer behaviors to answer new needs
Identify target market and trends
Pinpoint competitor products
(Google, 2017)
Structure and Culture Supporting Innovation
Structures
Multidivisional (Cosper, 2017)
Team
Project
Matrix
Culture
Built in organizations vision, goals and objectives
Employee empowerment (Trung, Nghi, Soldier, Hoi & Kim, 2014)
Support, incentive and reward from management
Available resources
Innovation-friendly Organization (Kotelnikov, 2017)
Google Home Inspired Inventions
Chatbots and Virtual Assistants (Brandon, 2016)
Possibly replace use and creation of apps
Order food from restaurants
Discuss auto repair
Schedule lawn service
Selecting college courses
New product feedback
Assistant with matching attire
Analysis of Future Innovations
Google Home Innovations
Needs more third party integration (McGrath, 2016)
Ability to personalize multiple accounts
Create appointments
Make to-do lists
Widen platform capability
Google Innovation SWOT Analysis
| Strengths Strong brand Global industry leader in search engines Robust presence in web advertisement | Weaknesses Low in-app presence Limited platform capability, Google Home Extreme reliance on advertising revenue (Google Inc. SWOT Analysis, 2015) |
| Opportunities Thriving home connectivity market New product innovation, Google home Increased android mobile and tablet demand | Threats Strong competition, Amazon Open litigations |
Google Invention SWOT Analysis
| Strengths Strong brand Global industry leader in search engines Customer loyalty | Weaknesses High reliance on advertising revenue Deficient in next generation device compatibility (MGM, 2017) |
| Opportunities Strong connected home demand forecast New product invention: Chatbot & stand alone Google Assistant Increased android mobile and tablet demand Ability to acquire smaller entities | Threats Strong competition Open litigations |
Benchmarking
Types of Benchmarking
Competitive
Compares performance of one function to direct competitors (Gift, 1996)
Functional
Examines methods and processes used outside of related industry
Potential Problems
Calibrating to a sub-par organization
Selecting wrong project and data (Gift, 1996)
Misinterpreting collected data
Castle Hub
Athos Homey
Amazon Tap
Echo Dot
Five Year Product Demand
Connect-Home Devices Industry
Growth of a compound annual rate of 67% (Danova, 2015)
Ships of 1.8 billion units
Drive revenue to reach $490 billion
Increase consumer demand for home-energy equipment
Demand for Google Home will increase
Consumer awareness
Product enhancement through innovation
Sustain competitive market price
Conclusion
Google diversified into strong industry of connected-home technology
Focus on Google Home innovations
Be a leader in presenting Chatbot and Google Assistant to market
Increase compatibility with next generation devices
Overall, well positioned to increase revenue and remain a industry leader
References
Brandon, John. (2016). Google Home, Amazon Echo, Alexa, and the Future of all Business. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/john-brandon/google-home-amazon-echo-alexa-and-the-future-of- all-business.html
Cosper, A. (2017) Innovative Organizational Structure. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/innovative-organizational-structure-43127.html
Danova, T. (2015). The Connected-Home Report: Forecasts and Growth Trends for one of the Top ‘ Internet of Things’ Markets. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/connected-h ome-forecasts-and-growth-2014-9
Google. (2017). Made By Google. Retrieved from https://madeby.google.com/home/
Gift, R. G. (1996). Benchmarking. Today's Management Methods, 245-261. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern. edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=902d7011-6a22-4e8c-9a38-4c4f9644979 d%40sessionmgr120&vid=5&hid=123
References continued
Google Inc. SWOT Analysis. (2015). Google Inc. SWOT Analysis, 1-10. Retrieved from http://web.
b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&s id=52de7b60-d3a0-4a01-8bbe-97061ab16f19%40sessionmgr120
Kotelnikov, V. (2017). Innovation-friendly Organization. Retrieved from http://www.1000 ventures. com/business_guide/innovation_aweorg.html
Kubyshyna, N., & Soltsev, S. (2007). Marketing Researches of New Product of Industrial Enterprises. Economics & Management, 404-409. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebs cohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? sid=c30d7626-5f09-42ae-a289-989de4d3ae5a%40sessionmgr4010&vid= 16&hid=4109
McGrath, J. (2016). Google Home Review. Retrieved from http://www.digitaltrends.com/ connected-home-reviews/google-home-review/
MSG. (2017). SWOT Analysis of Google. Retrieved from https://www.management
studyguide.com/swot-analysis-of-google.htm
References continued
Sofge, E. (2017). 72 Hours With Google Home. Retrieved from http://www.mensjournal.com/gear/ articles/72-hours-with-google-home-w460886
Trung, N., Nghi, P., Soldier, L., Hoi, T., & Kim, W. (2014). Leadership, Resource and Organizational
Innovation: Findings From State and Non-state Enterprises. International Journal Of Innovation Management, 18(5),-1.doi:10.1142/S1363919614500340 Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?sid=0d3107a5-482a-4075-a2fa 6bf5999e142a%40sessionmgr4010& vid=15&hid=4206
Zenios, S. (2016). Critical Questions When Launching Innovation. IESE Insight, (30), 55-61.
doi:10.15581/002.ART-2890 Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.library resources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=bfaf062d-2536-4a4c-b5d2- 6bcd21203ef 9%40sessionmgr107&vid=11&hid=123
image3.png
image4.png
image5.png
image6.png
image7.jpeg
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image12.jpeg
POL_PPP.docx
POL 2302 American State and Local Politics PPP
Unit III PowerPoint Presentation
Students will create a PowerPoint on state politics with no less than 10 content slides.
Using the U.S. state of your choice, create a PowerPoint presentation identifying the state's election and campaign processes, summarizing party politics and influences in the state, and identifying key political leadership positions at the local and state levels. Identify how state and local elected offices interact and are intertwined with the broader U.S. federal system.
Some ideas for additional details to include about your chosen state:
· types of primaries utilized,
· apportioning and districting information,
· gerrymandering, and
· important party or government issues.
Please do not copy and paste lists of senators and representatives into your slides. Use your creativity and organize the material in a logical, engaging, and understandable manner.
The PowerPoint should be a minimum of 10 slides in length, excluding the title and reference slides. Incorporate images, photos, charts, and graphics to support your information. Use bullet points rather than long paragraphs of text on your slides.
Use APA Style to properly cite graphics and paraphrased or quoted material. You must use at least three academic or government sources (excluding graphics) to support your presentation. Utilize the CSU Online Library for at least one of your sources.
ExamplePowerPointPresentation2.pptx
Civil Liberties Versus Civil Rights
Student Name
Columbia Southern University
Unit II
1
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court in the last two years
Leader of Civil Liberties
Civil Rights
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005 continued
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court in the last two years
Leader of Civil Rights
Supreme Court Influence
Supreme Court Influence continued
The Status of Equal Rights Today
References
Presentation Overview
2
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties are the rights of individuals to a free society. The protection from the government (Patterson, 2013).
The Fourteenth Amendment protects people’s rights from the actions of the state and local governments (Patterson, 2013).
For example- freedom from slavery, speech, forced labor, and due process of law (Patterson, 2013).
Known as the Bill of Rights.
3
3
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
In 1833, the Bill of Right was only applied to the actions of the national government (Patterson, 2013).
Challenged in the case of Barron v. Baltimore.
First ten amendments contain no expression of the intention to the state governments (Patterson, 2013).
In 1969 the Supreme Court Ruled.
Adults watch and read in their homes will not be consider a crime (Patterson, 2013).
4
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court in the Last Two Years
In 2016 Henry MONTGOMERY, v. LOUISIANA (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016).
The Court held that a juvenile convicted of a homicide could not be sentenced to life in prison without parole.
Montgomery murder Charles Hurt a deputy sheriff in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Supreme Court turnedover his conviction because public bias had prevented a fair trial (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016).
5
5
Leader of Civil Liberties
According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Susan N. Herman was elected President of the American Civil Liberties Union in October 2008.
Mrs. Herman served on the ACLU National Board of Directors for twenty years.
She was a member of the Executive Committee for sixteen years (Susan N. Herman, n.d.).
6
Photo (c) Susan N. Herman. (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.aclu.org/bio/susan-n-herman
6
Civil Rights
Civil rights address the question of people from differing groups.
Racial
Ethnic
Gender
How are they to be treated equally by the government (Patterson, 2013).
The law refers to people first and their groups second (Patterson, 2013).
7
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005
In 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
Supreme Court ruled that having distinct restrooms for singular races did not violate the Constitution but, both restrooms had to be the same (Patterson, 2013).
8
In 1971 Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg County Board of Education
Supreme Court authorized to approve that busing kids to schools outside their neighborhoods for racially combined schools (Patterson, 2013).
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court 1800-2005 continued
9
In 2016 UTAH, v. Edward Joseph STRIEFF, Jr. (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Narcotics detective Douglas Fackrell conducted an investigation on a residence based on a tip about drug activity.
After watching Edward Strieff leave the residence.
Officer Fackrell detained Strieff.
Strieff had a warrant for a traffic infraction.
After searched him, the officer found methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia.
Strieff moved to overturn the evidence, claiming that it was originated from an unlawful investigatory stop (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Evidence taken was incident to a lawful arrest (Utah v. Strieff, 2016).
Civil Rights and the Supreme Court in the Last Two Years
10
10
Nelson Mandela
South African politician.
Served as the President of South Africa.
He focused on getting rid of racism, poverty, and inequality.
He received the Nobel Peace Award
(Stubborn sense of fairness, 2016)
Leader of Civil Rights
11
11
The Constitution clarifies equal rights only in the general terms.
The Supreme Court has been tasked with how these constitutional assurances apply to specific situations.
Some of the Supreme Court decisions has supported and increased equal rights, while other decisions have restricted equal rights (Patterson, 2013).
Supreme Court Influence
12
The minority groups had a long struggle with the Supreme Court because of the fact the minority groups did not have a voice (Patterson, 2013).
People started to see how the minority group was being mistreated, because of the protests in Birmingham, Alabama where the minority groups were attacked by police dogs (Patterson, 2013).
Supreme Court Influence Continued
13
The various amendments to the Constitution guarantee freedom but, we still have a long way to go involving true equal rights for all (Patterson, 2013).
Today minority group are still battling for equal rights (Patterson, 2013).
Education Inequality
Equal Rights for Homosexuals
Voter ID Laws
The Status of Equal Rights Today
14
Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 - Supreme Court 2016
Patterson, T. (2013). The American democracy (11th ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Stubborn sense of fairness: Nelson Mandela's life-long struggle for peace and equality. (2016, October 03). Retrieved April 29, 2017, from http://historycooperative.org/nelson-mandela/
Susan N. Herman. (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.aclu.org/bio/susan-n-herman
Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056 - Supreme Court 2016
References
15
image1.jpeg
image2.jpeg
image3.jpeg
image4.png
image5.jpeg
image6.jpeg
image7.jpeg
image8.jpeg
image9.png
image10.jpeg
image11.png
image12.jpeg
image13.jpeg
ExamplePowerPointPresentation1.pptx
Jane doe
Columbia Southern University
Google Innovations
Table of Contents
Google Home
R&D: Lead Users and Market Research
Culture and Structure Supporting Innovation
Google Home Inspired Inventions
Analysis of Future Innovations
Google Innovation SWOT Analysis
Google Invention SWOT Analysis
Benchmarking
Five Year Product Demand
Conclusion
Google Home Description
Voice-Activated Speaker (Google, 2017)
Uses Google Assistant
Connects to Wi-Fi
Answers questions
Task management
Day planner
Controls systems in home
Interacts with Smart devices
Plays music
Plays movies
Plays games
Google Home (Sofge, 2017)
R&D: Lead Users & Market Research
Lead Users
Help discover market needs (Zenios, 2016)
Identify product usability during development
Help pinpoint needed and useful product features
Input decreases time from development to market
Market Research
Recognize consumer expectations (Kubyshyna & Sergii, 2007)
Detect changes in consumer behaviors to answer new needs
Identify target market and trends
Pinpoint competitor products
(Google, 2017)
Structure and Culture Supporting Innovation
Structures
Multidivisional (Cosper, 2017)
Team
Project
Matrix
Culture
Built in organizations vision, goals and objectives
Employee empowerment (Trung, Nghi, Soldier, Hoi & Kim, 2014)
Support, incentive and reward from management
Available resources
Innovation-friendly Organization (Kotelnikov, 2017)
Google Home Inspired Inventions
Chatbots and Virtual Assistants (Brandon, 2016)
Possibly replace use and creation of apps
Order food from restaurants
Discuss auto repair
Schedule lawn service
Selecting college courses
New product feedback
Assistant with matching attire
Analysis of Future Innovations
Google Home Innovations
Needs more third party integration (McGrath, 2016)
Ability to personalize multiple accounts
Create appointments
Make to-do lists
Widen platform capability
Google Innovation SWOT Analysis
| Strengths Strong brand Global industry leader in search engines Robust presence in web advertisement | Weaknesses Low in-app presence Limited platform capability, Google Home Extreme reliance on advertising revenue (Google Inc. SWOT Analysis, 2015) |
| Opportunities Thriving home connectivity market New product innovation, Google home Increased android mobile and tablet demand | Threats Strong competition, Amazon Open litigations |
Google Invention SWOT Analysis
| Strengths Strong brand Global industry leader in search engines Customer loyalty | Weaknesses High reliance on advertising revenue Deficient in next generation device compatibility (MGM, 2017) |
| Opportunities Strong connected home demand forecast New product invention: Chatbot & stand alone Google Assistant Increased android mobile and tablet demand Ability to acquire smaller entities | Threats Strong competition Open litigations |
Benchmarking
Types of Benchmarking
Competitive
Compares performance of one function to direct competitors (Gift, 1996)
Functional
Examines methods and processes used outside of related industry
Potential Problems
Calibrating to a sub-par organization
Selecting wrong project and data (Gift, 1996)
Misinterpreting collected data
Castle Hub
Athos Homey
Amazon Tap
Echo Dot
Five Year Product Demand
Connect-Home Devices Industry
Growth of a compound annual rate of 67% (Danova, 2015)
Ships of 1.8 billion units
Drive revenue to reach $490 billion
Increase consumer demand for home-energy equipment
Demand for Google Home will increase
Consumer awareness
Product enhancement through innovation
Sustain competitive market price
Conclusion
Google diversified into strong industry of connected-home technology
Focus on Google Home innovations
Be a leader in presenting Chatbot and Google Assistant to market
Increase compatibility with next generation devices
Overall, well positioned to increase revenue and remain a industry leader
References
Brandon, John. (2016). Google Home, Amazon Echo, Alexa, and the Future of all Business. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/john-brandon/google-home-amazon-echo-alexa-and-the-future-of- all-business.html
Cosper, A. (2017) Innovative Organizational Structure. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/innovative-organizational-structure-43127.html
Danova, T. (2015). The Connected-Home Report: Forecasts and Growth Trends for one of the Top ‘ Internet of Things’ Markets. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/connected-h ome-forecasts-and-growth-2014-9
Google. (2017). Made By Google. Retrieved from https://madeby.google.com/home/
Gift, R. G. (1996). Benchmarking. Today's Management Methods, 245-261. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern. edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=902d7011-6a22-4e8c-9a38-4c4f9644979 d%40sessionmgr120&vid=5&hid=123
References continued
Google Inc. SWOT Analysis. (2015). Google Inc. SWOT Analysis, 1-10. Retrieved from http://web.
b.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&s id=52de7b60-d3a0-4a01-8bbe-97061ab16f19%40sessionmgr120
Kotelnikov, V. (2017). Innovation-friendly Organization. Retrieved from http://www.1000 ventures. com/business_guide/innovation_aweorg.html
Kubyshyna, N., & Soltsev, S. (2007). Marketing Researches of New Product of Industrial Enterprises. Economics & Management, 404-409. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebs cohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? sid=c30d7626-5f09-42ae-a289-989de4d3ae5a%40sessionmgr4010&vid= 16&hid=4109
McGrath, J. (2016). Google Home Review. Retrieved from http://www.digitaltrends.com/ connected-home-reviews/google-home-review/
MSG. (2017). SWOT Analysis of Google. Retrieved from https://www.management
studyguide.com/swot-analysis-of-google.htm
References continued
Sofge, E. (2017). 72 Hours With Google Home. Retrieved from http://www.mensjournal.com/gear/ articles/72-hours-with-google-home-w460886
Trung, N., Nghi, P., Soldier, L., Hoi, T., & Kim, W. (2014). Leadership, Resource and Organizational
Innovation: Findings From State and Non-state Enterprises. International Journal Of Innovation Management, 18(5),-1.doi:10.1142/S1363919614500340 Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?sid=0d3107a5-482a-4075-a2fa 6bf5999e142a%40sessionmgr4010& vid=15&hid=4206
Zenios, S. (2016). Critical Questions When Launching Innovation. IESE Insight, (30), 55-61.
doi:10.15581/002.ART-2890 Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.library resources.columbiasouthern.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=bfaf062d-2536-4a4c-b5d2- 6bcd21203ef 9%40sessionmgr107&vid=11&hid=123
image3.png
image4.png
image5.png
image6.png
image7.jpeg
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image12.jpeg
- A+ Work
- Progress Report ( 2 pages) due in 12 hours
- Hybrid Model of Crisis
- Human Resource MGT Questions
- marketing question for genious alert1234
- New Homework Thermodynamics II
- Design and implement your own simple class to represent any
- A+ Paper
- A+ Answers
- Identify and describe a business process with which you are familiar