PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE
APA STYLE
5PAGES
USE RUBRICS AS A GUIDE
Attached is also my week 1 and week 2 discussion post
10 months ago 20
wk3TassignPERSONALPHILOSOPHYOFNURSINGPRACTICE.docx
wk3assignrubrics.docx
wk3TassignPERSONALPHILOSOPHYOFNURSINGPRACTICE.docx
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE
This Assignment, which you began in Week 1 and continued developing in Week 2, will be due by Day 7 of this week (Week 3). As you put the finishing touches on your personal philosophy of nursing practice, consider how interdisciplinary theories may enrich or help clarify your philosophy statement.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE
· Review and reflect on your philosophy of nursing practice that you have been developing or revising over the past 2 weeks. Make any revisions you think will improve it.
· Consider the ways in which your personal philosophy is informed by theory and research.
· Review the middle-range nursing theories you applied to your personal philosophy of nursing practice. Make any revisions you think will improve it.
· Consider the interdisciplinary theories you identified for the Discussion this week and how they may or may not be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
· Consider other interdisciplinary theories and how they may be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
· Think about how you will integrate interdisciplinary theories to strengthen or deepen the ways in which nursing science informs your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
THE ASSIGNMENT (3–5 PAGES)
In a 3- to 5-page paper (not including cover page and references page), describe your personal philosophy of nursing practice, including explanations of:
· How your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing
· How your personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission of social change
· How your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework
· How at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)
· How at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)
Note: Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations. The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site. for your Assignment submission.
image1.jpeg
wk3assignrubrics.docx
NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s on social change |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 7 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 7 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 7 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
10 pts |
Total Points: 130
wk3TassignPERSONALPHILOSOPHYOFNURSINGPRACTICE.docx
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE
This Assignment, which you began in Week 1 and continued developing in Week 2, will be due by Day 7 of this week (Week 3). As you put the finishing touches on your personal philosophy of nursing practice, consider how interdisciplinary theories may enrich or help clarify your philosophy statement.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE
· Review and reflect on your philosophy of nursing practice that you have been developing or revising over the past 2 weeks. Make any revisions you think will improve it.
· Consider the ways in which your personal philosophy is informed by theory and research.
· Review the middle-range nursing theories you applied to your personal philosophy of nursing practice. Make any revisions you think will improve it.
· Consider the interdisciplinary theories you identified for the Discussion this week and how they may or may not be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
· Consider other interdisciplinary theories and how they may be applicable to your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
· Think about how you will integrate interdisciplinary theories to strengthen or deepen the ways in which nursing science informs your personal philosophy of nursing practice.
THE ASSIGNMENT (3–5 PAGES)
In a 3- to 5-page paper (not including cover page and references page), describe your personal philosophy of nursing practice, including explanations of:
· How your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing
· How your personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission of social change
· How your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework
· How at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)
· How at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice (Be specific and provide examples.)
Note: Use this week’s Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and style for all references and citations. The College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the College of Nursing Writing TemplateLinks to an external site. for your Assignment submission.
image1.jpeg
wk3assignrubrics.docx
NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_8114_Week3_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy intersects with the four nursing domains: person, environment, health, and nursing or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s on social change |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with Walden’s mission on social change or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how your personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how their personal philosophy aligns with the SDOH framework or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two middle-range nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice |
20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described. 14 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how at least two interdisciplinary nursing theories support your personal philosophy of nursing practice or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the alignments described or it is missing. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 90% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 70% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 7 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 70% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 7 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 9 to >8.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 7 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
10 pts |
Total Points: 130
- assign1
- Business Capstone
- comparison essay
- case analysis
- EDU 305 Week 2 Individual Assignment Culture and Development Paper
- LASA 1: Ethical Case Study Analysis Paper
- Standard Normal Distribution
- What do you make of the parallels Haffner draws between sports mania and the enthusiasm for war?
- Fina Exam
- UDL/CAST Instructional Plan Analysis