PADM704 Human Resources and the Legal and Regulatory Context of Public Administration 7
Contemporary Issues in Human Resources
2 years ago 4
ResearchFinalAssignmentInstructions2.docx
Research-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
ResearchFinalAssignmentInstructions2.docx
PADM 704
Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions
220 Points Possible
Overview
Building upon the work in the annotated bibliography, thesis, abstract, and outline, you will identify a problem within the field of human resource management in today’s public administration. The paper must integrate key legal court cases or regulations related to this issue, ethical considerations and lastly, integrate a biblical worldview into not only the issue, but also the recommendations for the solution.
Instructions
· The paper must include an introduction, background on the issue, detailed presentation of the importance of the issue, discussion of possible solutions, and a recommendation for the solution.
· The paper must be 14-16 double-spaced pages of content, not counting title page, abstract, or references, and include a minimum of 15 scholarly resources and two classroom readings to support the student’s work.
· The paper must include a cover, abstract, and annotated bibliography that do not count towards your final word count.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Research-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Purpose
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
The research question is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
54 to >49 pts
Proficient
The research question may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
49 to >0 pts
Developing
The research question requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may be missing or ambiguous. Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. Organization may require significant improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
Reasoned Analysis
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used (first/second person perspective avoided). Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
54 to >49 pts
Proficient
Most major points are stated and supported by evidence and reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas. Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
49 to >0 pts
Developing
Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas. Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Support
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
At least 15 scholarly sources, in addition to course materials and the Bible, reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research are employed. Source material is properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
Some improvements and or additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed. Clarification of source material may be needed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
28 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant improvement of scholarly support (sources, table/figure requirements) is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Composition and Readability
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, and spelling is correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown. Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Sentences are generally complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
25 pts
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440
Criteria Ratings Points
Formatting 25 to >22 pts
Advanced
Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper is written in 12-point Times New Roman font, is double-spaced, and has 1” margins. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
Paper is generally laid out effectively and uses some reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) contains minimal inconsistencies with current APA formatting requirements. Paper may contain some inconsistencies with required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper may be laid out ineffectively or may not use sufficient reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations and/or Reference page(s) do not follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper may not follow required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
25 pts
Page Length
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
14-16 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
More than 1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Total Points: 220
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440
ResearchFinalAssignmentInstructions2.docx
PADM 704
Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions
220 Points Possible
Overview
Building upon the work in the annotated bibliography, thesis, abstract, and outline, you will identify a problem within the field of human resource management in today’s public administration. The paper must integrate key legal court cases or regulations related to this issue, ethical considerations and lastly, integrate a biblical worldview into not only the issue, but also the recommendations for the solution.
Instructions
· The paper must include an introduction, background on the issue, detailed presentation of the importance of the issue, discussion of possible solutions, and a recommendation for the solution.
· The paper must be 14-16 double-spaced pages of content, not counting title page, abstract, or references, and include a minimum of 15 scholarly resources and two classroom readings to support the student’s work.
· The paper must include a cover, abstract, and annotated bibliography that do not count towards your final word count.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Research-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Purpose
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
The research question is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
54 to >49 pts
Proficient
The research question may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
49 to >0 pts
Developing
The research question requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may be missing or ambiguous. Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. Organization may require significant improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
Reasoned Analysis
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used (first/second person perspective avoided). Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
54 to >49 pts
Proficient
Most major points are stated and supported by evidence and reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas. Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
49 to >0 pts
Developing
Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas. Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Support
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
At least 15 scholarly sources, in addition to course materials and the Bible, reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research are employed. Source material is properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
Some improvements and or additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed. Clarification of source material may be needed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
28 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant improvement of scholarly support (sources, table/figure requirements) is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Composition and Readability
25 to >22 pts
Advanced
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, and spelling is correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown. Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Sentences are generally complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
25 pts
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440
Criteria Ratings Points
Formatting 25 to >22 pts
Advanced
Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper is written in 12-point Times New Roman font, is double-spaced, and has 1” margins. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are fully addressed/incorporated.
22 to >20 pts
Proficient
Paper is generally laid out effectively and uses some reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) contains minimal inconsistencies with current APA formatting requirements. Paper may contain some inconsistencies with required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are generally addressed/ incorporated.
20 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper may be laid out ineffectively or may not use sufficient reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations and/or Reference page(s) do not follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper may not follow required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module: Week are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
25 pts
Page Length
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
14-16 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
More than 1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Total Points: 220
Research Paper: Final Grading Rubric | PADM704_B01_202440