Nursing assignment 99

Shabi20

see the attachments 

  • 7 months ago
  • 60
files (3)

paperprimary1outline.docx

I am writing this paper as a family nurse practitioner student:

Population Healthcare paper. This approximately 8-page paper should review a specific population with a specific disease process and seek out the evidence-based interventions that could close the gap towards optimum health  in that particular population. The paper is not to compare one race against another. The paper aims to identify an  adult population, health problem (s), innovative and evidence-based health promotion or intervention strategies, and proposed changes related to the nurse practitioner's  primary care role. The population may be defined by gender, ethnic culture,or age group and then look at the disease outcomes.  Health problems should be among the topics presented in this course.  Proposed interventions must be based on the evidence (based on the literature review students do for this paper).  This is a scholarly paper and should be referenced accordingly.

· Papers that are not coherent or have poor mechanics will not be accepted and the student will be referred to the writing center.

· This paper is subject to Copyleaks Plagiarism scrutiny and must be turned in through this mechanism to be considered for grading.  Do not  plagiarize your paper. If unfamiliar with what constitutes plagiarism, please work with the Writing Center

My topic: Obesity and Cardio metabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Hispanic Women

Instructor suggestion: would suggest is that it should not focus on screening, but on the actual diagnosis. We want to see how the outcomes are different when a certain population has the disease, not just being screened or not screened for it.

See the Rubric and sample paper that I attached

HealthcareDisparityRubric2.docx

Healthcare Disparity Rubric

Healthcare Disparity Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of problem and population

30 pts

Full Marks

1. The problems and are thoroughly addressed with emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. In-depth description of problem. 2. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem. 3. In-depth description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given. 4. Background provides context for the Problem & phenomenon of interest on a national scale. 5. Significance is clearly articulated. 6. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data/) 7. Purpose statement is clear and relates to the entire paper.

24 pts

B

The problems are discussed but weak emphasis of the impact of the problem on the population. Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue/problem but references are weak. Description of problem and its main issues for a particular population are given but not in depth. Background provides context for the problem & phenomenon of interest but no data on a national scale. Significance is articulated but clear. Strong statistical evidence is provided to support the significance (national data and/or local data but not thorough. Purpose statement is ambiguous and not clear and relates to the entire paper.

21 pts

C

Only 5-6 points are addressed In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references

18 pts

D

Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate data Too many secondary data Inaccurate information Not enough of references

0 pts

F

Plagiarism. ( 0 point)

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Innovative solutions & recommendations for change.

50 pts

A

1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. Well- researched with all references cited. How the review of literature was done is clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. The review includes sufficient studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest. The review is critical and not a catalog of studies 3. A summary statement at the end of the review synthesizes major research findings that point to the scientific/clinical importance of phenomenon (the problem that you discussed in the introductory section) under question. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, or are clear and appropriate to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are articulated and prioritized The proposed intervention plan is reasonable, feasible, and sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5. The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is clearly articulated. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are clearly described Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions.

40 pts

B

1. Relevant and recent support for evidence-based practice for the problem that was discussed in the introductory section is gathered and presented. But references are not relevant or not cited. The process of the review of literature is not clearly documented in the beginning of this section. 2. Studies/papers to support addressing the phenomenon of interest is weak and not enough. The review is critical but not in depth. 3. A summary statement at the end of the review is present but not clear and thorough. Extent of knowledge and depth of thought meet minimum expectations for scholarly work 4. Proposed intervention, solution, are ambiguous or not related to to problem and are based on the review of the literature. Most important elements needed for effective solutions are not articulated or prioritized The proposed intervention plan is not reasonable, feasible, or sustainable given the expected time, finances and professional expertise 5 The APN Role as related to the problem of interest is articulated but not in detail. NP skills needed for the APN to address the identified health problem are described but not in depth Clear explanation of NP’s approach to the solution is provided but weak. 6. Conclusion with implications for practice is present at the end of the paper. It wraps up the paper and revisits claims, findings and suggestions but not in depth.

35 pts

C

Only 3-4 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Not enough of references Conclusion is present but not clear neither strong.

30 pts

D

Only 1-2 points are addressed. In accurate analysis. Proposed interventions are not based on the review of literature Lack of references Conclusion is missing.

0 pts

F

Plagiarism

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence and mechanisms of writing.

10 pts

A

• There is evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • Almost no errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Good organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Very good flow and readability is evident

8 pts

8

• There is weak evidence of critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper • < 10 errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted • Fair organization of paper with standard English structures are noted • Good flow and readability is evident

7 pts

C

Critical thinking, analysis and synthesis throughout the paper is not present. Many errors in in spelling, punctuation, and grammar are noted Poorly organized paper with poor standard English structures are noted Poor

6 pts

D

Difficult to read. Numerous and major mechanical errors.

0 pts

F

Writing is very unclear.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

10 pts

A

• Works are cited correctly in 7th edition APA Citations are complete and correct. No formatting errors

8 pts

B

5 -10 APA errors including formatting errors

6 pts

C

More than 10 APA errors including formatting errors

6 pts

D

Incomplete or weak citations to points in the paper AND Major formatting errors

0 pts

NoF Marks

No citations. Difficult to read

10 pts

Total Points: 100

SampleHealthDisparityPaper-CaPAAMales31.docx
This file is too large to display.View in new window