nursing
a day ago 60
wk11instruc.docx
wk11intruc1.docx
wk11instruc.docx
The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
· Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
· Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
· Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
· Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
· A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
· An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
wk11intruc1.docx
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Disseminating ResultsCreate a, 8-9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:Briefly describe the following: your healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of issue, and EBP best practice recommendation.Explain how you would plan knowledge transfer and dissemination.Describe measurable outcomes with the implementation of EBP best practice.Summarize lessons learned. |
75 to >67.0 ptsExcellentThe narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation clearly and accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 67 to >59.0 ptsGoodThe narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 59 to >52.0 ptsFairThe narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 52 to >0 ptsPoorThe narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing. ...The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation, no examples are provided, or it is missing. ...The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing no specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. |
75 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodThe narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairThe narrated presentation minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. 3 to >0 ptsPoorThe narrated presentation fails to integrate any or presents minimal resources to support the presentation. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Narration |
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellentNarration is present. 0 ptsPoorNarration is missing. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodEighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairSixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 2 to >0 ptsPoorLess than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 100
Learning Resources
· Centers for Disease Control. (2024, January 17. Social determinates of health (SDOH)Links to an external site. . https://www.cdc.gov/about/priorities/why-is-addressing-sdoh-important.html
· Grammarly. (n.d.). Case study generatorLinks to an external site. . https://www.grammarly.com/case-study-generator
· OASIS. (n.d.). Social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh
· Review these instructions for guidance on how to create a narrated PowerPoint presentation. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office record-a-slide-show-with-narration-and-slide-timingsLinks to an external site.-0b9502c6-5f6c-40ae-b1e7-e47d8741161c
wk11instruc.docx
The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
· Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
· Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
· Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
· Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
· A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
· An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
wk11intruc1.docx
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Disseminating ResultsCreate a, 8-9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:Briefly describe the following: your healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of issue, and EBP best practice recommendation.Explain how you would plan knowledge transfer and dissemination.Describe measurable outcomes with the implementation of EBP best practice.Summarize lessons learned. |
75 to >67.0 ptsExcellentThe narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation clearly and accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 67 to >59.0 ptsGoodThe narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 59 to >52.0 ptsFairThe narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence-based project. ...The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. ...The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. 52 to >0 ptsPoorThe narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence-based project or is missing. ...The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation, no examples are provided, or it is missing. ...The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing no specific and relevant examples. ...The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned. |
75 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodThe narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairThe narrated presentation minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. 3 to >0 ptsPoorThe narrated presentation fails to integrate any or presents minimal resources to support the presentation. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Narration |
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellentNarration is present. 0 ptsPoorNarration is missing. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodEighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairSixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. 2 to >0 ptsPoorLess than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 100
Learning Resources
· Centers for Disease Control. (2024, January 17. Social determinates of health (SDOH)Links to an external site. . https://www.cdc.gov/about/priorities/why-is-addressing-sdoh-important.html
· Grammarly. (n.d.). Case study generatorLinks to an external site. . https://www.grammarly.com/case-study-generator
· OASIS. (n.d.). Social determinants of healthLinks to an external site.. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/Library/sdoh
· Review these instructions for guidance on how to create a narrated PowerPoint presentation. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office record-a-slide-show-with-narration-and-slide-timingsLinks to an external site.-0b9502c6-5f6c-40ae-b1e7-e47d8741161c