Motivation a driving force for goals achievement
Please see attachment for assignment reference and instruction.
a year ago 30
MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx
MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf
MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx
BMAL 703
Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions
Overview
Since motivation is a major determinate of a person’s persistence toward achieving a goal, it is important to examine how managers can use motivation to attain organizational goals. There are various theories to help managers understand how high performance can be effectively obtained from people.
This assignment requires you to examine one of 3 motivational theories: these include Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. For this assignment you will select Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory to analyze in detail. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of your selected theory according to biblical principles. There should be a cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion and reference sections (which do not count towards the minimum word count).
This paper must include the following 2 sections:
1. Theory Analysis from Literature: Analyze one of the following motivation theories; Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. In your analysis, define the theory, describe its intended purpose and functions, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. (At least 100 words in each of these sections)
2. Theory Evaluation from Scripture: Evaluate your chosen theory’s effectiveness according to biblical principles. Your biblical evaluation must include the following: A summary statement that explicitly states whether are not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature. (At least 100 words)
Required Headings
Cover page with Topic Title
Abstract
Theory Analysis from Literature
Definition of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Purpose and Function of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Strengths of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Weaknesses of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature (at least 100 words in this section)
Conclusions
References
Other Requirements
Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course.
· The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.
· Submit all course assignments in MS Word. Do not submit in PDF or in any other word processing application.
· In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion. Do not quote any words in the entire paper.
· The required cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.There is no maximum word count for any course assignments.
· The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. Your abstract should focus on key findings linked to management concepts in the assignment, but not on your specific research information. The abstract should be written as if it were a stand-alone document. Therefore, do not use phrases such as, “in this paper” which are more appropriate in the introduction section.
· The introduction should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. Your introduction must include a thesis statement, with a supporting citation at the end of your introduction section.
· Each of these headings must be addressed in at least one full paragraph, with at least 100 words for each heading: Definition of the Theory, Purpose and Function of the Theory, Strengths of the Theory, Weaknesses of the Theory, Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature.
· Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
· Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, encyclopedia and Course Hero will not be accepted. Turnitin similarity scores should not exceed 20%.
· Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence unless it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.
· Sentence lengths: Each sentence must not exceed 30 words.
· The first and second person may not be used. This assignment must be based on peer reviewed and biblical/Christian literature.
· Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, words with a double meaning, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective for example: “showcasing,” or “this paper aims to…” Use words that convey exact meaning.
· Submit your document for grading with the following file name syntax: Last name, First name
Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current peer-reviewed literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.
Grading Metrics
Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Define the Theory
5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly defined the theory.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily defined the theory.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently defined the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Not Present
5 pts
Describe the Purpose and Function of the Theory
10 to >5 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly described the purpose and function of the theory.
5 to >2 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily described the purpose and function of the theory.
2 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently described the purpose and function of the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not describe the purpose and function of the theory.
10 pts
Discuss the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Theory
25 to >18 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
18 to >9 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not submit the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
25 pts
Abstract 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms, and a biblical application are included.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application.
5 pts
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
5 pts
Conclusion 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
5 pts
Provide a Summary Statement That Explicitly States if the Theory Is or Is Not Effective According to the Bible or Christian literature.
15 to >9 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
9 to >3 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not provide a summary statement that explicitly states whether or not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
15 pts
Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count
10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count.
10 pts
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Formatting
5 to >3 pts
Advanced
APA formatting is thorough.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
APA formatting is satisfactory.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
APA formatting is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
APA formatting does not exist.
5 pts
References 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
References meet requirements in number and quality.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
References almost meet requirements in number and quality.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
References do not meet requirements in number and quality.
0 pts
Not Present
Missing references.
5 pts
Citations 10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Most statements are supported by citations.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Many statements are supported by citations.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Some statements are supported by citations.
0 pts
Not Present
Citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
MotivationTheoryAssignmentInstructions.docx
BMAL 703
Motivation Theory Assignment Instructions
Overview
Since motivation is a major determinate of a person’s persistence toward achieving a goal, it is important to examine how managers can use motivation to attain organizational goals. There are various theories to help managers understand how high performance can be effectively obtained from people.
This assignment requires you to examine one of 3 motivational theories: these include Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. For this assignment you will select Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory to analyze in detail. Then, evaluate the effectiveness of your selected theory according to biblical principles. There should be a cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion and reference sections (which do not count towards the minimum word count).
This paper must include the following 2 sections:
1. Theory Analysis from Literature: Analyze one of the following motivation theories; Expectancy, Equity, or Goal-Setting Theory. In your analysis, define the theory, describe its intended purpose and functions, and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. (At least 100 words in each of these sections)
2. Theory Evaluation from Scripture: Evaluate your chosen theory’s effectiveness according to biblical principles. Your biblical evaluation must include the following: A summary statement that explicitly states whether are not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature. (At least 100 words)
Required Headings
Cover page with Topic Title
Abstract
Theory Analysis from Literature
Definition of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Purpose and Function of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Strengths of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Weaknesses of the Theory (at least 100 words in this section)
Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature (at least 100 words in this section)
Conclusions
References
Other Requirements
Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course.
· The cover page must include this statement: By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.
· Submit all course assignments in MS Word. Do not submit in PDF or in any other word processing application.
· In-text citations are required to support your thesis statement, paragraph topic sentences points, statements, issues, arguments, concerns, statements of fact and opinion. Do not quote any words in the entire paper.
· The required cover page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, and reference sections are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper.There is no maximum word count for any course assignments.
· The abstract should be written within a range of 150-250 words. Your abstract should focus on key findings linked to management concepts in the assignment, but not on your specific research information. The abstract should be written as if it were a stand-alone document. Therefore, do not use phrases such as, “in this paper” which are more appropriate in the introduction section.
· The introduction should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It presents a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the case. Your introduction must include a thesis statement, with a supporting citation at the end of your introduction section.
· Each of these headings must be addressed in at least one full paragraph, with at least 100 words for each heading: Definition of the Theory, Purpose and Function of the Theory, Strengths of the Theory, Weaknesses of the Theory, Theory Evaluation from Scripture / Christian Literature.
· Your conclusion section should not be longer than ½ page, but not shorter than one paragraph. It clearly states the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
· Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, encyclopedia and Course Hero will not be accepted. Turnitin similarity scores should not exceed 20%.
· Paragraph lengths: Each paragraph should have a topic sentence unless it continues from or provides support to the prior paragraph. A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length.
· Sentence lengths: Each sentence must not exceed 30 words.
· The first and second person may not be used. This assignment must be based on peer reviewed and biblical/Christian literature.
· Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, words with a double meaning, and language that is too informal and/or too subjective for example: “showcasing,” or “this paper aims to…” Use words that convey exact meaning.
· Submit your document for grading with the following file name syntax: Last name, First name
Remember: This assignment and all assignments in this course have a management, not leadership focus. There is a distinct difference between management and leadership. Discuss management, not leadership. The Contemporary Management text only provides basic topical information. As a research-intensive doctoral course, you will need to research current peer-reviewed literature. There is no assignment in this course that can be completed by relying on the text alone.
Grading Metrics
Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
MotivationTheoryGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Define the Theory
5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly defined the theory.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily defined the theory.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently defined the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Not Present
5 pts
Describe the Purpose and Function of the Theory
10 to >5 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly described the purpose and function of the theory.
5 to >2 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily described the purpose and function of the theory.
2 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently described the purpose and function of the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not describe the purpose and function of the theory.
10 pts
Discuss the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Theory
25 to >18 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
18 to >9 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not submit the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
25 pts
Abstract 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms, and a biblical application are included.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and a biblical application are included.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings. Key terms and biblical application are not sufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings. Missing key terms and a biblical application.
5 pts
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
5 pts
Conclusion 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.
5 pts
Provide a Summary Statement That Explicitly States if the Theory Is or Is Not Effective According to the Bible or Christian literature.
15 to >9 pts
Advanced
Thoroughly provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
9 to >3 pts
Proficient
Satisfactorily provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
Insufficiently provided a summary statement that explicitly states if the theory is or is not effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
0 pts
Not Present
Did not provide a summary statement that explicitly states whether or not the theory is effective according to the Bible or Christian literature.
15 pts
Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count
10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Mechanics, composition, and word count is thorough.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Mechanics, composition, and word count is satisfactory.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Mechanics, composition, and word count is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
There are many errors in mechanics, composition, and word count.
10 pts
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Formatting
5 to >3 pts
Advanced
APA formatting is thorough.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
APA formatting is satisfactory.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
APA formatting is insufficient.
0 pts
Not Present
APA formatting does not exist.
5 pts
References 5 to >3 pts
Advanced
References meet requirements in number and quality.
3 to >1 pts
Proficient
References almost meet requirements in number and quality.
1 to >0 pts
Developing
References do not meet requirements in number and quality.
0 pts
Not Present
Missing references.
5 pts
Citations 10 to >8 pts
Advanced
Most statements are supported by citations.
8 to >5 pts
Proficient
Many statements are supported by citations.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Some statements are supported by citations.
0 pts
Not Present
Citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Motivation Theory Grading Rubric
- Finance week 6
- Pet Energy Therapy Association (PETA) treats peoples’ pets, and has the following cost structure:
- teamwork behavior negotiation
- STR581 FINAL EXAMS 1TO5 SETS
- accounting 2 paragraphs need in 2 hours
- help
- For Jperso.
- Global Business
- http://web.cse.ohio-state.edu/cse1223/currentsem/projects/CSE1223Project07.html
- maQueens fingers only