MODULE 1_DNP860

Assignment Description:

Indicator Description

Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least FOUR (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

 

Having a better understanding of our healthcare’s current focus on health quality improvement is vital in preparing for your DNP Project. No matter what you elect to focus on for your project, you need to start brainstorming the problems you want to solve. In this week’s assignment, you will analyze the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators.

· Select and share the indicator that resonates with you and impacts your clinical practice.

· Discuss the background of the problem as it relates to your selected indicator.

· Explain why this indicator is worthy of focusing on and describe why this is a problem in your practice.

· Address how this indicator plays a role in the National Quality Strategy.

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Consider the discussion and the any insights you gained from it.

3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

4. Create your assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling, and review the rubric.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

· Length: 2000 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

· Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

· References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

Reference:

Finkelman, A. (2020).  Quality improvement: A guide for integration in nursing (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284206531 Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2021).  Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research (5th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning. IBSN:978-1-274-22632-4. Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

Additional source

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).  About the national quality strategy.  https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/about/nqs-fact-sheets/nqs-fact-sheet-0214.html

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.).  Quality improvement and monitoring at your fingertips.  https://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/

Federal Drug Administration. (September 2019).  Institutional review board (IRBs) and protection of human subjects in clinical trials. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and Protection of Human Subjects in Clinical Trials | FDA.  https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/institutional-review-boards-irbs-and-protection-human-subjects-clinical-trials

Thomas Craig, K.J., McKillop, M.M., . . . Huang, H.T. (2020). U.S. hospital performance methodologies: A scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.  BMC Health Services Research, 20(640).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z

Titler, M.G. (2018). Translation research in practice: An introduction.  OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(2).  https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01

Instruction

Scholarly articles from 2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.

This is my Topic

“ This quality improvement project is to implement the use of an evidence-based self-care tool, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), to improve diabetes self-care behaviors among adults with type 2 diabetes.”

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement - Aspen University Classroom

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement - Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content Weight:

30

%

/ 30

0

points

Topic is inappropri

-

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

-

standing of con

-

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

-

stand; does not ad

-

dress many assign

-

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

-

tion to the assign

-

ment topic.

21

points

Topic is mostly cov

-

ered and appropri

-

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

-

quately demonstrate

accurate under

-

standing of con

-

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

-

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

24

Topic is covered

completely and ap

-

propriate to assign

-

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

-

sions is evident;

clear and under

-

standable; ad

-

dresses all of the re

-

quirements of the

assignment descrip

-

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

30

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

-

ing clarity and ex

-

planation of con

-

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

-

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

-

cused details.

Organization Weight: 25%	0 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.	17.5 points Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information.	20 points Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.	25 points Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.	/ 25
Logic/Argument Weight: 15%	0 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.	10.5 points Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.	12 points Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.	15 points Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.	/ 15

Support Weight: 20%

0 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident.

14 points Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.

16 points Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.

20 points Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style and voice inap

-

propriate or do not

address given audi

-

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

-

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

-

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

7

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

-

ate to given audi

-

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

-

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

-

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

8

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

-

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

-

priate language are

used.

points

10

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

-

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

-

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

-

cific, purposeful, dy

-

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

-

dard, written, aca

-

demic English.

3/10/26, 6:48 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP860 Sect1 Evidence-Based Practice for Quality Improvement - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

70

points minimum

Level 3

80

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/118315/viewContent/6269447/View 1/5

1/5