Literature Review Final
Follow instruction and rubric
7 months ago 80
VIDEOS.docx
LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
VIDEOS.docx
LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 745
Literature Review Final Assignment Instructions
Overview
A literature review is a logical argument based on peer-reviewed research articles. The literature review demonstrates the researcher has thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and based upon that review, has determined a need for further research. The literature review begins with a discussion of the study’s purpose and results, and then transitions to an argument for the need for further research. You should cite the results portion of other research in this paper and discuss needs for further research. The literature review for this assignment is based upon the topic identified in Module 2.
Instructions
The paper must contain the following elements, using the current APA style:
1. Title page
2. Abstract
3. Review of Literature
• Both summarize and critically evaluate the current literature on the topic.
• Create within the summary an argument for why this topic is important, and the issues and new research needs to address.
• This must be written in a research-scientific format as if it is to be submitted to a journal for publication (refer to APA handbook and guidelines)
This review may serve as the basis for your future research interests but is to be based upon the topic selected in Module 2. For a sufficient overview of the literature, your review must be 7–10 pages of empirically-based, critical writing.
Your review must:
1. Summarize the research in a logical, sequential manner
2. Make a case for why additional research needs to be conducted to fill important gaps in the scientific literature
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Literature Review Co mposition
22 to >20 pts
Advanced
• The student composed a 7–10 page literature review that included all required sections and applied all the sources meaningfully.
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
• The student composed a 7–10 page literature review that included all required sections and applied most of the sources meaningfully.
18 to >16 pts
Developing
• The student composed a 5–6 page literature review that included all or most of the required sections and applied some of the sources meaningfully.
16 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student composed a 1–4 page literature review that included some of the required sections and applied few of the sources meaningfully.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
22 pts
Literature Review Summary of the Research
53 to >48 pts
Advanced
• The student’s summary included ample arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed.
48 to >44 pts
Proficient
• The student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
44 to >40 pts
Developing
• The student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
40 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
0 pts
Not Pre sent
53 pts
Literature Review Evaluation of the Research
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
• Evaluation of literature is thoroughly assessed using point comparisons /contrasts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/w eaknesses with supportive evidence demonstrated critical thinking and personal application to selected counseling topic.
27 to >25 pts
Proficient
• Evaluation of literature is assessed using point comparisons/c ontrasts, questions, and/or noting streng ths/weaknesses with supportive evidence.
25 to >22 pts
Developing
• The student’s evaluation of literature is weak. C omparisons/contras ts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/we aknesses need improvement.
22 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student’s evaluation of literature is very weak or absent. Co mparisons/contrast s, raising questions, and/or noting streng ths/weaknesses needs significant improvement; Supportive evidence was lacking.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
30 pts
Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 23 to >21 pts
Advanced
• The literature review properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. • The literature review reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
• The literature review mostly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly. • The literature review reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are few spelling and/or grammar errors.
19 to >17 pts
Developing
• The literature review uses some current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly. • The literature review sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are some spelling and/or grammar errors.
17 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The literature review uses few current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly. • The literature review seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are many spelling and/or grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
23 pts
Sources 22 to >20 pts
Advanced
• The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources. • All reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
• The Reference page meets the required number of sources. • Most reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
18 to >16 pts
Developing
• The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. • Some reference page sources are not referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
16 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. • Few reference page sources are referenced in a literature review subheading area. .
0 pts
Not Pre sent
22 pts
Total Points: 150
Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620
VIDEOS.docx
LiteratureReviewFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 745
Literature Review Final Assignment Instructions
Overview
A literature review is a logical argument based on peer-reviewed research articles. The literature review demonstrates the researcher has thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and based upon that review, has determined a need for further research. The literature review begins with a discussion of the study’s purpose and results, and then transitions to an argument for the need for further research. You should cite the results portion of other research in this paper and discuss needs for further research. The literature review for this assignment is based upon the topic identified in Module 2.
Instructions
The paper must contain the following elements, using the current APA style:
1. Title page
2. Abstract
3. Review of Literature
• Both summarize and critically evaluate the current literature on the topic.
• Create within the summary an argument for why this topic is important, and the issues and new research needs to address.
• This must be written in a research-scientific format as if it is to be submitted to a journal for publication (refer to APA handbook and guidelines)
This review may serve as the basis for your future research interests but is to be based upon the topic selected in Module 2. For a sufficient overview of the literature, your review must be 7–10 pages of empirically-based, critical writing.
Your review must:
1. Summarize the research in a logical, sequential manner
2. Make a case for why additional research needs to be conducted to fill important gaps in the scientific literature
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
LiteratureReview-FinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Literature Review Co mposition
22 to >20 pts
Advanced
• The student composed a 7–10 page literature review that included all required sections and applied all the sources meaningfully.
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
• The student composed a 7–10 page literature review that included all required sections and applied most of the sources meaningfully.
18 to >16 pts
Developing
• The student composed a 5–6 page literature review that included all or most of the required sections and applied some of the sources meaningfully.
16 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student composed a 1–4 page literature review that included some of the required sections and applied few of the sources meaningfully.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
22 pts
Literature Review Summary of the Research
53 to >48 pts
Advanced
• The student’s summary included ample arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed.
48 to >44 pts
Proficient
• The student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
44 to >40 pts
Developing
• The student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
40 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s).
0 pts
Not Pre sent
53 pts
Literature Review Evaluation of the Research
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
• Evaluation of literature is thoroughly assessed using point comparisons /contrasts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/w eaknesses with supportive evidence demonstrated critical thinking and personal application to selected counseling topic.
27 to >25 pts
Proficient
• Evaluation of literature is assessed using point comparisons/c ontrasts, questions, and/or noting streng ths/weaknesses with supportive evidence.
25 to >22 pts
Developing
• The student’s evaluation of literature is weak. C omparisons/contras ts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/we aknesses need improvement.
22 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The student’s evaluation of literature is very weak or absent. Co mparisons/contrast s, raising questions, and/or noting streng ths/weaknesses needs significant improvement; Supportive evidence was lacking.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
30 pts
Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 23 to >21 pts
Advanced
• The literature review properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. • The literature review reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors.
21 to >19 pts
Proficient
• The literature review mostly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly. • The literature review reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are few spelling and/or grammar errors.
19 to >17 pts
Developing
• The literature review uses some current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly. • The literature review sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are some spelling and/or grammar errors.
17 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The literature review uses few current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. • In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly. • The literature review seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are many spelling and/or grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Pre sent
23 pts
Sources 22 to >20 pts
Advanced
• The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources. • All reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
20 to >18 pts
Proficient
• The Reference page meets the required number of sources. • Most reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
18 to >16 pts
Developing
• The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. • Some reference page sources are not referenced in at least one literature review subheading area.
16 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
• The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. • Few reference page sources are referenced in a literature review subheading area. .
0 pts
Not Pre sent
22 pts
Total Points: 150
Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric | EDCO745_D02_202620
- Ind project and dis board
- 3 pages HW, Business Law
- overhead costs Background: Frutronics Inc. is a $2 billion dollar firm with sales in consumer products and government systems and services. Founded...
- PCN-520 Week 6 Group Design Part 3
- assignment and response week 4
- MHR 6551 UNIT I Essay
- IT
- Case Scenario Analysis
- HIS105
- Software Design