Journal Topic
3 months ago 25
Unit5Journal.docx
Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx
Unit5Journal.docx
Journal Topic
Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This journal entry invites you to reflect on one comprehension strategy and consider how it supports meaning-making for young children.
This journal builds on the learning you have done in Units 2–4 and helps you connect theory to practice in a personal, low-stakes way.
Journal Prompt (250–350 words)
Choose one comprehension strategy from this unit (e.g., making connections, predicting, asking questions, visualizing, retelling, summarizing, inferring, using text structure, monitoring comprehension).
In your journal response, address the following four areas in your own words:
1. Identify the Strategy (2–3 sentences)
Name the strategy you selected and describe it in your own words.
Focus on clarity rather than formal definitions.
2. Why This Strategy Matters for Young Children (4–6 sentences)
Explain why this strategy is important for helping children make sense of stories.
Use ideas from the unit readings or resources to support your explanation.
3. A Realistic Example From a Classroom or Read-Aloud (4–6 sentences)
Describe how you have seen—or can imagine—a teacher modeling or teaching this strategy during a read-aloud or picture-book experience.
You may draw from:
your own work experience
a memory from school
an observation
the videos or examples in the course
4. How the Strategy Builds Comprehension (4–6 sentences)
Explain how this strategy actually strengthens meaning-making for children.
Think about:
how it helps them understand the story
how it builds language
how it supports deeper thinking
Submission Requirements
Length: 250–350 words
Format: Journal entry (not an academic paper)
Voice: Write in your own authentic voice
APA: Only required if you directly reference a source
NAEYC 2021 Alignment
Standard 5b: Understanding content knowledge in literacy
Standard 5c: Using appropriate teaching strategies
Standard 4b/4c: Supporting learning through intentional teaching
Standard 6d: Professional communication
Reference:
Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx
Reading Comprehension
Chapter 6
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
1
Chapter 6 Learning Objectives
6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.
6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.
6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.
6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.
6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)
Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose
Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge
Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)
Types of readers:
Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas
Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)
Qualities of good readers:
Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)
Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read
e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring
Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically
i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction
Level of interest
Prior knowledge
Text complexity
Genre
Type of text
Vocabulary
Pictures and other text features
Sociocultural context
Decoding skills
English language proficiency
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)
Making connections
Predicting and inferring
Questioning
Monitoring and clarifying
Summarizing and synthesizing
Evaluating
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)
Making connections
Text-to-self
Text-to-text
Text-to-world
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)
Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about
Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)
Questioning
Literal questions
Inferential questions
Critical questions
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)
Monitoring and clarifying
Stopping routinely to monitor understanding
Using fix-up strategies when off track
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)
Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text
Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)
Evaluating
Analyzing a text and making judgments
(e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)
Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)
To promote students’ motivation to read:
Value reading for pleasure
Encourage students to read when they have free time
Allow choice in what to read
Provide access to rich and varied books
Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors
Build in time for talking about books and ideas
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension
Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4a Close Reading
Close reading is an instructional routine
Students critically examine a text
Examination often happens through repeated readings
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)
Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension
Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)
Text complexity for narrative texts:
Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)
Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)
Text complexity for informational texts:
Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)
Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)
Concepts
Key content area vocabulary
Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature
Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically
Examples include:
Book talks
Jackdaws
Open mind portraits
Quick write or quick draw
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension
Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts
The texts should be carefully selected
The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
image1.emf
image2.emf
image3.emf
image4.emf
image5.emf
image6.emf
image7.emf
image8.emf
image9.tiff
Unit5Journal.docx
Journal Topic
Comprehension is how young children make meaning from stories—not just by hearing words, but by building connections, visualizing, asking questions, predicting, and interpreting text. This journal entry invites you to reflect on one comprehension strategy and consider how it supports meaning-making for young children.
This journal builds on the learning you have done in Units 2–4 and helps you connect theory to practice in a personal, low-stakes way.
Journal Prompt (250–350 words)
Choose one comprehension strategy from this unit (e.g., making connections, predicting, asking questions, visualizing, retelling, summarizing, inferring, using text structure, monitoring comprehension).
In your journal response, address the following four areas in your own words:
1. Identify the Strategy (2–3 sentences)
Name the strategy you selected and describe it in your own words.
Focus on clarity rather than formal definitions.
2. Why This Strategy Matters for Young Children (4–6 sentences)
Explain why this strategy is important for helping children make sense of stories.
Use ideas from the unit readings or resources to support your explanation.
3. A Realistic Example From a Classroom or Read-Aloud (4–6 sentences)
Describe how you have seen—or can imagine—a teacher modeling or teaching this strategy during a read-aloud or picture-book experience.
You may draw from:
your own work experience
a memory from school
an observation
the videos or examples in the course
4. How the Strategy Builds Comprehension (4–6 sentences)
Explain how this strategy actually strengthens meaning-making for children.
Think about:
how it helps them understand the story
how it builds language
how it supports deeper thinking
Submission Requirements
Length: 250–350 words
Format: Journal entry (not an academic paper)
Voice: Write in your own authentic voice
APA: Only required if you directly reference a source
NAEYC 2021 Alignment
Standard 5b: Understanding content knowledge in literacy
Standard 5c: Using appropriate teaching strategies
Standard 4b/4c: Supporting learning through intentional teaching
Standard 6d: Professional communication
Reference:
Towell_CLA1e_PPT_Ch06.pptx
Reading Comprehension
Chapter 6
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
1
Chapter 6 Learning Objectives
6-1 Explain reading comprehension concepts.
6-2 Determine factors that impact comprehension instruction.
6-3 Describe motivation for literacy engagement.
6-4 Analyze comprehension instruction in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
6-5 Apply comprehension strategies for children’s literature.
6-6 Demonstrate literacy strategies and practices for reading comprehension.
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 1 of 3)
Comprehension is the active process of constructing meaning with a text for a specific purpose
Meaning is shaped by the text itself and the reader’s background knowledge
Thinking critically about texts requires comprehension
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 2 of 3)
Types of readers:
Readers who have a meaning-based concept of reading understand that reading is about communicating ideas
Readers who have a skill-based concept of reading are word callers, pronouncing words without meaning
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-1 Reading Comprehension Concepts (slide 3 of 3)
Qualities of good readers:
Able to understand own thinking during reading process (metacognition)
Have a repertoire of comprehension strategies they use when they read
e.g., predicting, summarizing, inferring
Use all 3 language cueing systems automatically
i.e., syntactic, semantic, graphophonic
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2 Factors that Impact Comprehension Instruction
Level of interest
Prior knowledge
Text complexity
Genre
Type of text
Vocabulary
Pictures and other text features
Sociocultural context
Decoding skills
English language proficiency
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 1 of 7)
Making connections
Predicting and inferring
Questioning
Monitoring and clarifying
Summarizing and synthesizing
Evaluating
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 2 of 7)
Making connections
Text-to-self
Text-to-text
Text-to-world
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 3 of 7)
Predicting: Using evidence from the text to guess what it will be about
Inferring: Using what is known to understand what is less certain
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 4 of 7)
Questioning
Literal questions
Inferential questions
Critical questions
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 5 of 7)
Monitoring and clarifying
Stopping routinely to monitor understanding
Using fix-up strategies when off track
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 6 of 7)
Summarizing: Succinctly stating the main ideas in a text
Synthesizing: Thinking creatively about what has been learned and how thinking has changed
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-2a Strategies for Reading Comprehension (slide 7 of 7)
Evaluating
Analyzing a text and making judgments
(e.g., about a character’s decisions, about the author’s craft)
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 1 of 2)
Enjoyment is a central part of reading and, therefore, must be a priority in teaching reading
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-3 Motivation for Literacy Engagement (slide 2 of 2)
To promote students’ motivation to read:
Value reading for pleasure
Encourage students to read when they have free time
Allow choice in what to read
Provide access to rich and varied books
Use read-alouds to introduce new books and authors
Build in time for talking about books and ideas
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4 Comprehension Instruction in the Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require critical thinking and deep comprehension
Students must be able to read and understand complex texts in multiple genres across the curriculum
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4a Close Reading
Close reading is an instructional routine
Students critically examine a text
Examination often happens through repeated readings
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 1 of 3)
Text complexity: characteristics of texts that are critical for comprehension
Narrative texts and informational texts have different features that contribute to their complexity
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 2 of 3)
Text complexity for narrative texts:
Text structures (e.g., multiple plot lines)
Text features (e.g., table of contents, embedded illustrations)
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-4b Text Complexity and Struggling Readers (slide 3 of 3)
Text complexity for informational texts:
Text structures (e.g., cause and effect, question and answer)
Text features (e.g., table of contents, maps, graphs)
Concepts
Key content area vocabulary
Informational texts tend to be more challenging for students because they are less familiar
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-5 Comprehension Strategies for Children’s Literature
Comprehension strategies involve interactive activities to engage students cognitively, socioemotionally, and physically
Examples include:
Book talks
Jackdaws
Open mind portraits
Quick write or quick draw
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6-6 Literacy Strategies and Practices for Reading Comprehension
Comprehension instruction is designed to support students as they make meaning with texts
The texts should be carefully selected
The activities should scaffold students’ creative and thoughtful engagement with ideas
©2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
image1.emf
image2.emf
image3.emf
image4.emf
image5.emf
image6.emf
image7.emf
image8.emf
image9.tiff
- Essay (Track it Back)
- Resources: EEOC website at http://www.eeoc.gov and the U. S.
- ENG 215 Assignment 3 Persuasive Paper Part I - A Problem Exists*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial use as Guide paper*****
- ANOVA
- Ethical Issues in the News
- Choosing an Article for the Article Review Final Paper
- Implementation
- note
- Business homework for Harculis Yuan only
- Unit I Essay