Human Resource Management COMPAA W6 ASSIGNMENT
SEE ATTACHED
2 years ago 15
COMPW6AAASSIGNMENT.docx
HRA562AppliedAssignmentScoringRubric.pdf
COMPW6AAASSIGNMENT.docx
**Cite textbook and outside sources. Strategic Compensation: Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: a human resource management approach (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN: 9780135192146
Assignments:
*****Imagine you are designing an incentive plan for your organization’s (or an organization of your choice) middle managers. Create both short-term and long-term incentives, explaining why you feel they will be motivating to middle-managers. Why does this group require separate consideration?
· The analysis should be presented in an APA format.
· The analysis should be 3-4 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list.
(This Assignment is linked to Turnitin.)
HRA562AppliedAssignmentScoringRubric.pdf
HRA 562 – Applied Assignment Scoring Rubric
Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _______________________
Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria:
Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%)
Proficient: Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%)
Basic: Corresponds to C- to C+ (75-79%)
Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0-74%)
Elements
Criteria
Score
(pts) Not Attempted
(Criterion is missing or not in evidence)
Basic (works towards meeting
expectations; performance
needs improvement)
Proficient (meets expectations;
performance is satisfactory)
Exemplary (exceeds expectations;
performance is outstanding)
Content
80%
□ Little to no evidence
of assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer addressed none
to some of the
requirements of the
assignment
□ Little to no evidence
of appropriate use of
resources
□ Writer had little to no
focus on the topic
0 – 59pts
□ More personal
assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development is
needed
□ Writer addressed most
of the requirements of
the assignment
□ Some required sources
not used
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic some of the
time
60 – 63pts
□ Content adequately
shows personal
assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer adequately
addressed all
requirements of the
assignment
□ Appropriate use of
resources
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic most of
the time
64 – 71pts
□ Content clearly shows
personal assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer clearly and
completely addressed
all requirements of the
assignment
□ Masterful use of
resources
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic throughout
the paper
72 – 80pts
____/80
APA
Formatting
10%
□ Little to no evidence
of appropriate APA
formatting
0 – 7.4pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
most of the paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations with several
minor and/or some
major discrepancies,
7.5 – 7.9pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
the entire paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations with only a
few minor
discrepancies
8.0 – 8.9pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
the entire paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations
9.0 – 10pts
____/10
Mechanics
10%
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness
substantially lacking
or absent.
□ Little to no evidence
of language skills,
substantial spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Little to no evidence
of flow.
□ Length requirement
missed substantially
0 – 7.4pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used
somewhat.
□ Improvement needed
on language, significant
spelling or grammatical
errors.
□ Transitions are weak,
flow of the paper needs
improvement.
□ Paper fell just short of
length requirement.
7.5 – 7.9pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used
most of the time.
□ Language is
professional, clear, and
concise, with some
spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Transitions maintain
the flow of the paper
most of the time.
□ Paper is appropriate
length.
8.0 – 8.9pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used.
□ Language is
professional, clear, and
concise, with little to
no spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Transitions maintain
the flow of the paper.
□ Paper is appropriate
length.
9.0 – 10pts
____/10
Comments/Feedback: ____/100 pts
COMPW6AAASSIGNMENT.docx
**Cite textbook and outside sources. Strategic Compensation: Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: a human resource management approach (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN: 9780135192146
Assignments:
*****Imagine you are designing an incentive plan for your organization’s (or an organization of your choice) middle managers. Create both short-term and long-term incentives, explaining why you feel they will be motivating to middle-managers. Why does this group require separate consideration?
· The analysis should be presented in an APA format.
· The analysis should be 3-4 pages in length, excluding the title page and reference list.
(This Assignment is linked to Turnitin.)
HRA562AppliedAssignmentScoringRubric.pdf
HRA 562 – Applied Assignment Scoring Rubric
Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _______________________
Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria:
Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%)
Proficient: Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%)
Basic: Corresponds to C- to C+ (75-79%)
Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0-74%)
Elements
Criteria
Score
(pts) Not Attempted
(Criterion is missing or not in evidence)
Basic (works towards meeting
expectations; performance
needs improvement)
Proficient (meets expectations;
performance is satisfactory)
Exemplary (exceeds expectations;
performance is outstanding)
Content
80%
□ Little to no evidence
of assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer addressed none
to some of the
requirements of the
assignment
□ Little to no evidence
of appropriate use of
resources
□ Writer had little to no
focus on the topic
0 – 59pts
□ More personal
assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development is
needed
□ Writer addressed most
of the requirements of
the assignment
□ Some required sources
not used
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic some of the
time
60 – 63pts
□ Content adequately
shows personal
assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer adequately
addressed all
requirements of the
assignment
□ Appropriate use of
resources
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic most of
the time
64 – 71pts
□ Content clearly shows
personal assessment,
synthesis/integration,
critical analysis, and
logical development
□ Writer clearly and
completely addressed
all requirements of the
assignment
□ Masterful use of
resources
□ Writer stayed focused
on the topic throughout
the paper
72 – 80pts
____/80
APA
Formatting
10%
□ Little to no evidence
of appropriate APA
formatting
0 – 7.4pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
most of the paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations with several
minor and/or some
major discrepancies,
7.5 – 7.9pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
the entire paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations with only a
few minor
discrepancies
8.0 – 8.9pts
□ Appropriate APA
formatting throughout
the entire paper,
including title page,
paper layout,
references, and
citations
9.0 – 10pts
____/10
Mechanics
10%
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness
substantially lacking
or absent.
□ Little to no evidence
of language skills,
substantial spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Little to no evidence
of flow.
□ Length requirement
missed substantially
0 – 7.4pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used
somewhat.
□ Improvement needed
on language, significant
spelling or grammatical
errors.
□ Transitions are weak,
flow of the paper needs
improvement.
□ Paper fell just short of
length requirement.
7.5 – 7.9pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used
most of the time.
□ Language is
professional, clear, and
concise, with some
spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Transitions maintain
the flow of the paper
most of the time.
□ Paper is appropriate
length.
8.0 – 8.9pts
□ Scholarly format,
syntax, and
persuasiveness used.
□ Language is
professional, clear, and
concise, with little to
no spelling or
grammatical errors.
□ Transitions maintain
the flow of the paper.
□ Paper is appropriate
length.
9.0 – 10pts
____/10
Comments/Feedback: ____/100 pts