hum 5 AM

ItsTommy1995
Home>Homework Answsers>English homework help
humeng
  • 2 years ago
  • 20
Report issue
files (2)

hum5assisgn.docx

Instructions

Develop: Presentation

Evaluation Title: Monomyth and Superhero, Recycled Themes

Heroes have always been a part of written stories. Heroes from Greek mythology often had super-human characteristics, but also had fatal flaws, and often met with tragic ends because of these flaws. The era post World War I and II created comic book heroes that did not seem to have any flaws. The current super-heroes all seem to be dark heroes – heroes that may not always do acceptable (legal) things, but overall may have good intentions. One similarity that many hero stories share is the monomyth, or hero’s journey, as you read about in this week’s unit. 

Be sure to address the following in your presentation:

· Discuss how the character of one Hero or Superhero (fictional) reflects the times that they are written. You may select a fictional hero from any era, however, you should be comfortable describing that era’s culture as well.

· Explain why this hero would resonate with the general era in which they were written.

· Describe the elements of the monomyth that are apparent in this hero’s story.   HINT! Utilize a template like the one listed below to break down each part of the monomyth.

Specifications:

Submission: A 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation or Prezi that answers the questions posed above. Include speaker notes or a voice-over, images, and videos where applicable.  If you choose the voice-over option, you will upload your recording web link (URL). 

In your presentation:

· Provide speaker’s notes or a voice over on the PowerPoint to accompany each slide.  If you choose speaker’s notes, the total word count of your notes should be 800-1000 words.  If you choose to create a voice-over recording your presentation should be 5-7 minutes long.

· Include a title slide and include your references page in APA format on the last slide of the presentation.

Unit5Assessmentrubrichum.docx

Unit 5 Assessment - Monomyth and Superhero, Recycled Themes

Unit 5 Assessment - Monomyth and Superhero, Recycled Themes

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

HU340-CO2

27 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

24 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

22 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

PRICE-P

27 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

24 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

22 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

15 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

14 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

12 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

11 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

9 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

6 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling  with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

2 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a  limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-I

6 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

5 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

4 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 - 4 minor APA errors.

3 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6 pts

Total Points: 85