help with assgn due in 48 hours

In your own words, define each:

Ethos

Logos

Pathos

Answer these questions:

Insert a screenshot of your chosen post in this response box.

What is the post about?

What audience is the post targeting?

What is the creator trying to persuade the audience to do, think, or feel?

Answer these questions to explain how the post uses each rhetorical appeal:

What’s one moment that uses logos? What makes it logical (or maybe where it fails to be logical)?

What’s one moment that uses ethos? How is credibility or trust shown (or lost) with the target audience?

What’s one moment that uses pathos? How does it create emotion?

Rhetorial Appeals Grading Rubric (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart1: Definitions of Appeals

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentDefines all three appeals clearly, in own words; definitions are accurate, concise (1–2 sentences), and show full understanding.

8 to >6.0 ptsProficientMostly clear definitions; may have 1 minor misunderstanding or slightly vague wording. Student uses 1-2 full sentences.

6 to >4.0 ptsDevelopingDefinitions are unclear, incomplete, copied from another source, or show limited understanding and/or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences.

4 to >0 ptsMissingImportant elements missing and/or vague.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Description of Post

10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentPost is shared (link or screenshot). Student clearly answers all four questions with relevant detail and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences. Shows understanding of purpose and audience. Student uses complete sentences.

8 to >6.0 ptsProficientPost link or screenshot is included. Answers most questions with some detail, though one may be vague or slightly incomplete. Student uses complete sentences and each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.

6 to >4.0 ptsDevelopingMissing post link/screenshot, student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or responses are vague, incomplete, or don’t show full understanding.

4 to >0 ptsMissingImportant elements missing and/or vague.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Identifying Appeals

20 to >15.0 ptsExcellentGives strong, specific examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the post. Each explanation clearly connects the example to the appeal and shows insight. Each response is at least 1-2 complete sentences.

15 to >10.0 ptsProficientGives examples of all three appeals with mostly clear explanations. Each response is a minimum of 1-2 complete sentences. One example may be underdeveloped or inaccurate.

10 to >5.0 ptsDevelopingMissing one or more appeals, or student does not use 1-2 complete sentences, or explanations are vague, inaccurate, and/or disconnected from the example.

5 to >0 ptsMissingImportant elements missing and/or vague.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Assessment of Effectiveness

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentClearly identifies which appeal worked best and supports the choice with thoughtful reasoning in at least two complete sentences.

4 to >3.0 ptsProficientIdentifies an appeal and provides some reasoning in at least two complete sentences, though explanation may be general or underdeveloped.

3 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingChoice is unclear or reasoning is missing/weak; less than two sentences or not complete sentences.

2 to >0 ptsMissingImportant elements missing and/or vague

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentNo serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader.

4 to >3.0 ptsProficientErrors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader but they are not serious or frequent.

3 to >2.0 ptsDevelopingErrors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation interrupt the reader somewhat frequently.

2 to >0 ptsMissingSerious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation make reading difficult.

5 pts