Help

Kjjanders4

500-750 with References

2 years ago
31.01.2024
7

Report issue

files (1)

ESD-501Rubric-HistoryandPerceptionofInclusionReferenceListandReflection.pdf

ESD-501Rubric-HistoryandPerceptionofInclusionReferenceListandReflection.pdf

History and Perception of Inclusion Reference List and Reflection - Rubric

Part 1: Research 34 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Research

5. Target 34 points

All sources are compelling, proficiently relate to the research topic, and are from

within the last five years. Includes substantial variety of resource types.

4. Acceptable 29.58 points

All sources are credible, appropriately relate to the research topic, and are from

within the last five years. Includes considerable variety of resource types.

3. Approaching 25.16 points

Most of the sources are credible, minimally relate to the research topic, and are

from within the last five years. Includes partially incomplete variety of resource

types.

2. Insufficient 23.46 points

Missing some sources; or some of the sources are not credible, adequate, or from

within the last five years. Includes insufficient variety of resource types.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Part 2: Re�ection 25.5 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Reflection

5. Target 25.5 points

Reflection realistically describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is convincing.

4. Acceptable 22.19 points

Reflection accurately describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is logical.

3. Approaching 18.87 points

Reflection ambiguously describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is shallow.

2. Insufficient 17.6 points

Reflection does not realistically describe the area of special education and the

impetus for going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students

with disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is

unconvincing.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Organization 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 8.5 points

The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the

audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a

sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Format/Documentation (Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college,

subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.)

5. Target 8.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language

use, sentence structure, etc.)

5. Target 8.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 85 points

https://www.gce.com/

ESD-501Rubric-HistoryandPerceptionofInclusionReferenceListandReflection.pdf

History and Perception of Inclusion Reference List and Reflection - Rubric

Part 1: Research 34 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Research

5. Target 34 points

All sources are compelling, proficiently relate to the research topic, and are from

within the last five years. Includes substantial variety of resource types.

4. Acceptable 29.58 points

All sources are credible, appropriately relate to the research topic, and are from

within the last five years. Includes considerable variety of resource types.

3. Approaching 25.16 points

Most of the sources are credible, minimally relate to the research topic, and are

from within the last five years. Includes partially incomplete variety of resource

types.

2. Insufficient 23.46 points

Missing some sources; or some of the sources are not credible, adequate, or from

within the last five years. Includes insufficient variety of resource types.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

https://www.gce.com/

Part 2: Re�ection 25.5 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Reflection

5. Target 25.5 points

Reflection realistically describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is convincing.

4. Acceptable 22.19 points

Reflection accurately describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is logical.

3. Approaching 18.87 points

Reflection ambiguously describes the area of special education and the impetus for

going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students with

disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is shallow.

2. Insufficient 17.6 points

Reflection does not realistically describe the area of special education and the

impetus for going into that field. Explanation of the role as an advocate for students

with disabilities in education and qualities to be successful in that role is

unconvincing.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Organization 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 8.5 points

The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the

audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a

sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Format/Documentation 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Format/Documentation (Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college,

subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.)

5. Target 8.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 8.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language

use, sentence structure, etc.)

5. Target 8.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 7.4 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 6.29 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient 5.86 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 85 points

https://www.gce.com/

other Questions(10)