eval 2
attached
2 years ago 7
evaluation2.docx
EvaluateStage-KritikRubric.pdf
evaluation2.docx
Evaluate Stage: Peer Review Instructions
You will be asked to evaluate the submission other groups oral presentation. A rubric will be available so that you may rate your fellow peers on their presentation.
In the Evaluate phase of this assignment, your group will evaluate the oral presentation and powerpoint for two assigned groups. Within this phase of the assignment you will practice scoring submissions based on a rubric and providing written feedback as well.
This phase of the assignment allows you to practice delivering constructive and positive feedback to others. This is a critical skill to master within the field of ABA.
· Use the rubric provided in Kritik to assign scores and ensure fair, objective grading.
· Read each item on the rubric carefully so that you know what you are rating
· Ratings should fair and directly related to the item on the rubric
· Collaborate with your group to reach a consensus for each evaluation.
· Provide constructive feedback and use a positive tone.
· Write a comment on their oral presentation and powerpoint presentation.
· Must be 20 or more words
· Focus on:
· Strengths of the presentation and PowerPoint.
· Specific, actionable suggestions for improvement.
· Use of professional, constructive language.
· Remain objective when grading a group. Do not compare one groups submission to the other groups submission. The point of reference should be the rubric and whether they're meeting the designated guidelines.
· Submit your evaluations by the specified deadline.
Grading during the Evaluation Stage
As you prepare to evaluate your peers' presentations during the Evaluation Stage in Kritik, I want to remind you of the importance of grading objectively. Your evaluations should be based solely on the criteria outlined in the rubric, not on comparisons between groups.
It’s natural to notice when one group goes above and beyond, but this should not result in lower scores for other groups that fully meet the rubric's standards. If a group satisfies all the rubric criteria, they deserve full credit for those elements—regardless of whether another group performed exceptionally well. The rubric is the standard by which all presentations should be graded, and everyone should be evaluated fairly based on that standard.
Here are a few tips to ensure fair and objective evaluations:
1. Review the rubric thoroughly before starting the evaluation process, and keep it open while grading.
2. Focus on the content and delivery of the presentation in relation to the rubric, rather than comparing it to other presentations.
3. Provide constructive and specific feedback based on what you observe in the presentation and how it aligns with the rubric criteria.
This skill—remaining objective, supportive, and positive in evaluations—is an essential one for BCaBAs, especially when practicing in a supervisory role. As future supervisors, you will train therapists and caregivers with varying levels of skill and experience. To be effective in this role, you’ll need to focus on clear performance criteria, provide supportive feedback, and maintain a positive and professional tone, even when some individuals may exceed expectations while others are still learning. Practicing this skill now will help you excel as a leader in the future.
Evaluations:
1. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/12cDmxZ06PxQisuuLHzxe6XrWoczSoIuW0NCu2isLZ4Q/edit?usp=sharing
EvaluateStage-KritikRubric.pdf
Edit Rubric Rubric Template Custom Rubric
Save as Manage Templates
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Weight
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Oral Presentation link or
video provided
Video was not provided Video provided
Powerpoint presentation
provided
Did not include the Powerpoint
presentation in the submission
Powerpoint presentation was
provided
Did the presenters
introduce themselves?
The presenters did not
introduce themselves.
The presenters introduced
themselves.
Target behavior was
clearly labeled
Group did not mention what
behavior they are targetting
Group mentioned the behavior
being targeted
Target behavior was
operationally de�ned
Behavioral de�nition not
included in presentation
Behavioral de�ntion provided
either orally or in the
Powerpoint
Social signi�cance for
intervenining on behavior
explained
Group members didn't explain
the rationale for intervening on
that behavior (social
signi�cance)
Group members explained the
rationale for selecting that
behavior
Ethical Consideration
Described
Ethical considerations before,
during, or after treatment were
not described
This section includes any
ethical implications for
selecting this target behavior.
Include any anticipated ethical
concerns identi�ed prior to the
development of the treatment
plan, as well as any ethical
concern that arose during
implementation. Include a
summary of steps taken to
prevent ethical situations, as
1 pt
1 pt
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
10 pts
EAB4795 - RVC RVD - Fall 2024 / BIP Oral Presentation and Powerpoint
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 1/4
well as steps taken if an ethical
The relevant research to
your study is
summarized in the
presentation
The relevant research and
articles were not provided or
discussed
Research was partially
summarized (one or two
articles discussed only).
Group members provided a
summary of the articles that
supported the treatment
components selected in the
treatment package. The name
of the article, as well as the
date published and authors
must be clearly indicated. A
minimum of three articles
must be summarized in this
section.
Treatment package
described (see
description)
The intervention was not
described
The intervention components
were described, but it was
unclear and/or some critical
information about how the
intervention was implemented
was missing.
This section includes a
summary of the treatment
package. Each treatment
component must include a
description of the intervention
and why it was selected. This
section must include at least
one reduction intervention
and/or one teaching strategy
(minimally, the functionally-
equivalent replacement
behavior).
Measurement and data
collection procedures
described
The group did not discuss how
they collected data
The group described how they
collected data, but 2 or more
pieces of information were
missing or unclear
The group described the data
collection procedures, but was
missing 1 of the required
components.
The group clearly and
completely described data
collection procedures. 1.
Described the dimension of
behavior measured and
provided rationale for selecting
that dimension(e.g., frequency,
duration, partial interval
recording, etc.) 2. Described
how they collected data (e.g.,
using a data sheet, using an
10 pts
15 pts
10 pts
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 2/4
Graphs were shown
within presentation
Group did not present a graph
with baseline and intervention
data
Group displayed a graph with
baseline and intervention data.
Graphs were easy to read
and interpret (see
description)
More than 2 components are
missing making it di�cult to
interpret the data/ graph.
The graph(s) are clearly
labeled with participant names,
x-and y-axis labels, data path
labels (if applicable), and
baseline data separated from
intervention data.
Summarized and
interpreted baseline and
treatment data (see
description)
Did not summarize the
baseline and treatment data
Summarized the data, but
missed 2 or more components
Summarized the data, but
missed 1 component.
Verbally summarized both
baseline and treatment data.
This summary must reference
a graphic display in the
PowerPoint presentation. The
summary must review the
trend level and variability of the
date. This section must also
evaluate the e�cacy of the
treatment components based
on the data.
FBA selection process
and procedures are
described
Assessment procedures were
not described OR 2 or more
pieces of information missing.
The assessments were
discussed, but more than 1
piece of information was
missing.
Assessment procedures
described. Mentioned the
assessment that was
conducted. Brief description of
the assessment, why the
assessment was selected, and
assessment results. If
applicable, the hypothesized
function of behavior is
mentioned.
Fidelity and IOA
procedures and results
described (If no IOA was
collected, that is ok since
this is a self-
No IOA or �delity procedures or
results described.
Fidelity procedures and results
described. If applicable, the
IOA procedures and results
were also descussed.
2 pts
3 pts
10 pts
8 pts
5 pts
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 3/4
Total weight: 130 pts
Rubric Grading
You cannot use "Pass/Fail" grading option if criteria have different levels from one another in your rubric.
management study it
isn't always feasible.)
Organization
The presentation has no clear
sequence and no required
content headers were used.
The presentation does not
have the content headers in
order and the sequence was
di�cult to follow.
Presentation follows a logical
sequence with minor
distractions and used the
required content headers in
sequence.
Logical, engaging and
sophisticated sequence within
the presentation. Content
headers were used and in
sequence.
Knowledge
Demonstrated no
understanding of information.
Incorrect and unsupported
information was presented
Demonstrated minimal
understanding of the subject.
Inaccurate information is
presented with important
information left out
Demonstrated an
understanding of the strategies
used. Information was
accurate with minor errors.
Demonstrated thorough
understanding of the
interventions used by
presenting accurate
information comfortably
Verbal Language
Low volume and/or
monotonous tone. The
audience was unable to
understand
Speaks with little or no
in�ection
Satisfactory volume and
in�ection
Well managed �uctuation of
volume
Presentation length
Presentation exceeds 30
minutes or is far less than 15
minutes long.
The oral presentation meets
the duration parameters.
10 pts
10 pts
10 pts
5 pts
Clear Rubric
Numeric Pass/Fail
Save Cancel
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 4/4
evaluation2.docx
Evaluate Stage: Peer Review Instructions
You will be asked to evaluate the submission other groups oral presentation. A rubric will be available so that you may rate your fellow peers on their presentation.
In the Evaluate phase of this assignment, your group will evaluate the oral presentation and powerpoint for two assigned groups. Within this phase of the assignment you will practice scoring submissions based on a rubric and providing written feedback as well.
This phase of the assignment allows you to practice delivering constructive and positive feedback to others. This is a critical skill to master within the field of ABA.
· Use the rubric provided in Kritik to assign scores and ensure fair, objective grading.
· Read each item on the rubric carefully so that you know what you are rating
· Ratings should fair and directly related to the item on the rubric
· Collaborate with your group to reach a consensus for each evaluation.
· Provide constructive feedback and use a positive tone.
· Write a comment on their oral presentation and powerpoint presentation.
· Must be 20 or more words
· Focus on:
· Strengths of the presentation and PowerPoint.
· Specific, actionable suggestions for improvement.
· Use of professional, constructive language.
· Remain objective when grading a group. Do not compare one groups submission to the other groups submission. The point of reference should be the rubric and whether they're meeting the designated guidelines.
· Submit your evaluations by the specified deadline.
Grading during the Evaluation Stage
As you prepare to evaluate your peers' presentations during the Evaluation Stage in Kritik, I want to remind you of the importance of grading objectively. Your evaluations should be based solely on the criteria outlined in the rubric, not on comparisons between groups.
It’s natural to notice when one group goes above and beyond, but this should not result in lower scores for other groups that fully meet the rubric's standards. If a group satisfies all the rubric criteria, they deserve full credit for those elements—regardless of whether another group performed exceptionally well. The rubric is the standard by which all presentations should be graded, and everyone should be evaluated fairly based on that standard.
Here are a few tips to ensure fair and objective evaluations:
1. Review the rubric thoroughly before starting the evaluation process, and keep it open while grading.
2. Focus on the content and delivery of the presentation in relation to the rubric, rather than comparing it to other presentations.
3. Provide constructive and specific feedback based on what you observe in the presentation and how it aligns with the rubric criteria.
This skill—remaining objective, supportive, and positive in evaluations—is an essential one for BCaBAs, especially when practicing in a supervisory role. As future supervisors, you will train therapists and caregivers with varying levels of skill and experience. To be effective in this role, you’ll need to focus on clear performance criteria, provide supportive feedback, and maintain a positive and professional tone, even when some individuals may exceed expectations while others are still learning. Practicing this skill now will help you excel as a leader in the future.
Evaluations:
1. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/12cDmxZ06PxQisuuLHzxe6XrWoczSoIuW0NCu2isLZ4Q/edit?usp=sharing
EvaluateStage-KritikRubric.pdf
Edit Rubric Rubric Template Custom Rubric
Save as Manage Templates
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Weight
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Oral Presentation link or
video provided
Video was not provided Video provided
Powerpoint presentation
provided
Did not include the Powerpoint
presentation in the submission
Powerpoint presentation was
provided
Did the presenters
introduce themselves?
The presenters did not
introduce themselves.
The presenters introduced
themselves.
Target behavior was
clearly labeled
Group did not mention what
behavior they are targetting
Group mentioned the behavior
being targeted
Target behavior was
operationally de�ned
Behavioral de�nition not
included in presentation
Behavioral de�ntion provided
either orally or in the
Powerpoint
Social signi�cance for
intervenining on behavior
explained
Group members didn't explain
the rationale for intervening on
that behavior (social
signi�cance)
Group members explained the
rationale for selecting that
behavior
Ethical Consideration
Described
Ethical considerations before,
during, or after treatment were
not described
This section includes any
ethical implications for
selecting this target behavior.
Include any anticipated ethical
concerns identi�ed prior to the
development of the treatment
plan, as well as any ethical
concern that arose during
implementation. Include a
summary of steps taken to
prevent ethical situations, as
1 pt
1 pt
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
10 pts
EAB4795 - RVC RVD - Fall 2024 / BIP Oral Presentation and Powerpoint
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 1/4
well as steps taken if an ethical
The relevant research to
your study is
summarized in the
presentation
The relevant research and
articles were not provided or
discussed
Research was partially
summarized (one or two
articles discussed only).
Group members provided a
summary of the articles that
supported the treatment
components selected in the
treatment package. The name
of the article, as well as the
date published and authors
must be clearly indicated. A
minimum of three articles
must be summarized in this
section.
Treatment package
described (see
description)
The intervention was not
described
The intervention components
were described, but it was
unclear and/or some critical
information about how the
intervention was implemented
was missing.
This section includes a
summary of the treatment
package. Each treatment
component must include a
description of the intervention
and why it was selected. This
section must include at least
one reduction intervention
and/or one teaching strategy
(minimally, the functionally-
equivalent replacement
behavior).
Measurement and data
collection procedures
described
The group did not discuss how
they collected data
The group described how they
collected data, but 2 or more
pieces of information were
missing or unclear
The group described the data
collection procedures, but was
missing 1 of the required
components.
The group clearly and
completely described data
collection procedures. 1.
Described the dimension of
behavior measured and
provided rationale for selecting
that dimension(e.g., frequency,
duration, partial interval
recording, etc.) 2. Described
how they collected data (e.g.,
using a data sheet, using an
10 pts
15 pts
10 pts
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 2/4
Graphs were shown
within presentation
Group did not present a graph
with baseline and intervention
data
Group displayed a graph with
baseline and intervention data.
Graphs were easy to read
and interpret (see
description)
More than 2 components are
missing making it di�cult to
interpret the data/ graph.
The graph(s) are clearly
labeled with participant names,
x-and y-axis labels, data path
labels (if applicable), and
baseline data separated from
intervention data.
Summarized and
interpreted baseline and
treatment data (see
description)
Did not summarize the
baseline and treatment data
Summarized the data, but
missed 2 or more components
Summarized the data, but
missed 1 component.
Verbally summarized both
baseline and treatment data.
This summary must reference
a graphic display in the
PowerPoint presentation. The
summary must review the
trend level and variability of the
date. This section must also
evaluate the e�cacy of the
treatment components based
on the data.
FBA selection process
and procedures are
described
Assessment procedures were
not described OR 2 or more
pieces of information missing.
The assessments were
discussed, but more than 1
piece of information was
missing.
Assessment procedures
described. Mentioned the
assessment that was
conducted. Brief description of
the assessment, why the
assessment was selected, and
assessment results. If
applicable, the hypothesized
function of behavior is
mentioned.
Fidelity and IOA
procedures and results
described (If no IOA was
collected, that is ok since
this is a self-
No IOA or �delity procedures or
results described.
Fidelity procedures and results
described. If applicable, the
IOA procedures and results
were also descussed.
2 pts
3 pts
10 pts
8 pts
5 pts
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 3/4
Total weight: 130 pts
Rubric Grading
You cannot use "Pass/Fail" grading option if criteria have different levels from one another in your rubric.
management study it
isn't always feasible.)
Organization
The presentation has no clear
sequence and no required
content headers were used.
The presentation does not
have the content headers in
order and the sequence was
di�cult to follow.
Presentation follows a logical
sequence with minor
distractions and used the
required content headers in
sequence.
Logical, engaging and
sophisticated sequence within
the presentation. Content
headers were used and in
sequence.
Knowledge
Demonstrated no
understanding of information.
Incorrect and unsupported
information was presented
Demonstrated minimal
understanding of the subject.
Inaccurate information is
presented with important
information left out
Demonstrated an
understanding of the strategies
used. Information was
accurate with minor errors.
Demonstrated thorough
understanding of the
interventions used by
presenting accurate
information comfortably
Verbal Language
Low volume and/or
monotonous tone. The
audience was unable to
understand
Speaks with little or no
in�ection
Satisfactory volume and
in�ection
Well managed �uctuation of
volume
Presentation length
Presentation exceeds 30
minutes or is far less than 15
minutes long.
The oral presentation meets
the duration parameters.
10 pts
10 pts
10 pts
5 pts
Clear Rubric
Numeric Pass/Fail
Save Cancel
11/19/24, 9:12 PM Edit Activity Rubric | Kritik
https://us.kritik.io/course/cm34nkmuw024y250gu1c6rp7y/assignment/cm3p13ej403wiv036p96xd9sl/edit-assignment 4/4
- Payment Link
- GEN:499 Final research paper
- accounting help
- MGT 448 Week 1 Individual Assignment Globalization Questionnaire
- MGT 437 Week 1 Individual Assignment Project Management Paper
- ACC 281 Week 1 DQ 1 ( Why is Accounting Needed and Basic Accounting Equation ) - Tutorial Contains Two Answers For This Discussion - A Graded - Best Tutorial - Quality Work
- ACC 260 WEEK 5 CheckPoint Approaches to Stakeholder Impact Analysis
- BIS 320 Week 3 Individual Assignment Determining Databases and Data Communications
- questions 001 follow up I need a second opinion with this subject. This question needs to be done and think as if you were the CEO of best buy corporation, This is the question that needs to be answer and think of the how solve the problem on hand. How c
- How vital is to develop revenue policy aligned with community values?