Education Health IS/IT Components Assignment

Minicaa
  • a year ago
  • 25
files (2)

HealthISITComponentsAssign.docx

Choose a challenge for health information systems that most interests you and write a 750–1,000-word response about how you envision yourself addressing the challenge. Include the following points in your response:

· Define the six major challenges for health information systems.

· Defend where your selected challenge fits into the list of six major challenges for health information systems, and at what perceived priority the selected challenge should be addressed.

· Propose correction of the selected challenge.

· Discuss future challenges related to your suggested correction of the selected challenge.

· Explain how to reduce the negative impact of such a new challenge.

· Conclude with a discussion of the evolution of health information systems and what some of the future challenges may be with the implementation of existing technology in health care.

Use references please

Rubric-HealthISITComponents.pdf

6/29/25, 1:26 PM

Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc

Health IS/IT Components - Rubric Total 85 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target

Six Major Challenges for

Health Information

Systems

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems

0 points

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems is not

included.

6.08 points

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems is

partially incorporated, but

the information provided is

incomplete, inaccurate, or

otherwise deficient.

7.01 points

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems is

present, but only minimal

detail or support is

provided.

7.95 points

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems is

provided with appropriate

details and support.

9.35 points

Definition of six major

challenges for health

information systems is

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Selected Challenge

Priority

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed

0 points

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed is not included.

6.08 points

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed is partially

incorporated, but the

information provided is

incomplete, inaccurate, or

otherwise deficient.

7.01 points

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed is present, but

only minimal detail or

support is provided.

7.95 points

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed is provided with

appropriate details and

support.

9.35 points

Defense of where selected

challenge fits into list of six

major challenges for health

information systems and at

what priority selected

challenge should be

addressed is thoroughly

explored and clearly

explained with relevant

details and support.

Correction of Selected

Challenge

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge

0 points

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge is not

included.

6.63 points

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge is

partially incorporated, but

the information provided is

incomplete, inaccurate, or

otherwise deficient.

7.65 points

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge is

present, but only minimal

detail or support is

provided.

8.67 points

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge is

provided with appropriate

details and support.

10.2 points

Proposal of correction of

selected challenge is

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Future Challenges

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge

0 points

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge is not

included.

6.63 points

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge is

partially incorporated, but

the information provided is

incomplete, inaccurate, or

otherwise deficient.

7.65 points

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge is

present, but only minimal

detail or support is

provided.

8.67 points

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge is

provided with appropriate

details and support.

10.2 points

Discussion of future

challenges related to

suggested correction of

selected challenge is

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Reduction of Negative

Impact

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge

0 points

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge is not

included.

6.63 points

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge is

incomplete, inaccurate, or

otherwise deficient.

7.65 points

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge is

provided.

8.67 points

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge is

provided with appropriate

details and support.

10.2 points

Explanation of how to

reduce the negative impact

of new challenge is

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Evolution of Health

Information Systems

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care

0 points

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care is not included.

6.63 points

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care is incomplete,

inaccurate, or otherwise

deficient.

7.65 points

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care is provided.

8.67 points

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care is provided

with appropriate details

and support.

10.2 points

Discussion of evolution of

health information systems

including future challenges

in implementation of

existing technology in

health care is thoroughly

explored and clearly

explained with relevant

details and support.

6/29/25, 1:26 PM

Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc

Thesis, Position, or

Purpose

Communicates reason for

writing and demonstrates

awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is not discernible.

No awareness of the

appropriate audience is

evident.

3.32 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is unfocused or

confused. There is very

little awareness of the

intended audience.

3.82 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is discernable in

most aspects but is

occasionally weak or

unclear. There is limited

awareness of the

appropriate audience.

4.34 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is adequately

presented. An awareness

of the appropriate

audience is demonstrated.

5.1 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is clearly

communicated throughout

and clearly directed to a

specific audience.

Development, Structure,

and Conclusion

Advances position or

purpose throughout

writing; conclusion aligns

to and evolves from

development.

0 points

No advancement of the

thesis, position, or purpose

is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are

missing or inappropriate.

No conclusion is offered.

3.32 points

Writing lacks logical

progression of the thesis,

position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted,

but ideas are disconnected.

Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the

overall development of the

purpose.

3.82 points

Limited advancement of

thesis, position, or purpose

is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in

organization or the

relationship of ideas.

Conclusion is simplistic and

not fully aligned to the

development of the

purpose.

4.34 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is advanced in

most aspects. Ideas clearly

build on each other.

Conclusion aligns to the

development of the

purpose.

5.1 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is logically

advanced throughout. The

progression of ideas is

coherent and unified. A

clear and logical conclusion

aligns to the development

of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates

evidence to support and

advance position/purpose;

considers other

perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the

thesis, position, or purpose

is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective

of the writer.

4.42 points

Evidence is limited or

irrelevant. The

interpretation of other

perspectives is superficial

or incorrect.

5.1 points

Evidence is used but is

insufficient or of limited

relevance. Simplistic

explanation or integration

of other perspectives is

present.

5.78 points

Relevant evidence that

includes other perspectives

is used.

6.8 points

Specific and appropriate

evidence is included.

Relevant perspectives of

others are clearly

considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

capitalization, punctuation,

grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or

syntax are pervasive and

impede meaning. Incorrect

language choice or

sentence structure errors

are found throughout.

2.76 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors are

present. Inconsistencies in

language choice or

sentence structure are

recurrent.

3.19 points

Occasional mechanical

errors are present.

Language choice is

generally appropriate.

Varied sentence structure

is attempted.

3.61 points

Few mechanical errors are

present. Suitable language

choice and sentence

structure are used.

4.25 points

No mechanical errors are

present. Appropriate

language choice and

sentence structure are

used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style,

such as APA, MLA, etc., for

college, subject, and level;

documents sources using

citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography,

etc., appropriate to

assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not

used. No documentation of

sources is provided.

2.76 points

Appropriate format is

attempted, but some

elements are missing.

Frequent errors in

documentation of sources

are evident.

3.19 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used,

although there are some

obvious errors.

3.61 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used

with only minor errors.

4.25 points

No errors in formatting or

documentation are

present.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.