Education 6.3 Assignment: Change Communication Gone Wrong

karenrayne


  • 3 years ago
  • 20
files (4)

6.3AssignmentChangeCommunicationGoneWrong.html.zip

6.3 Assignment Change Communication Gone Wrong.html

Getting Started

How can we make it better?

In this assignment, you will relate concepts you have learned from the course text to a real-world experience. To do so, you will write a verbatim. A verbatim is a summary account of an experience in which you participated. Writing down the experience provides you the opportunity to examine the event and learn from the positive and negative communication dynamics that occurred. The verbatim creates an opportunity for you to view the event from multiple perspectives.

Your verbatim will describe a time in which your leader or organization instituted a change and your analysis of that experience. Using resources from this course and previous courses, address what went right, what went wrong, and how it could have gone better. This is a chance for you to pull multiple tools from your leadership toolkit built up over the program and use them together.

Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:

  • Critique a previous change initiative using select knowledge and skills gained through the BSOL program.

Instructions

  1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. 
  2. The paper must be 5-7 pages in length.
  3. The paper should have a minimum of seven different sources cited. 
  4. Compose a verbatim in which you address the following: 
    1. Explain the change your leader or organization was implementing. 
    2. Use the Introduction to Communications videos from Workshop One and identify communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, maybe there was too much “noise” around the announcement). 
    3. Using Crucial Conversations, state the identified communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, did the leader or organization make it safe for employees to discuss the change and its implications). 
    4. Did the communication about the change take into account personal communication styles, intergenerational communication, or cross-cultural communication principles?
    5. What Biblical principle have you learned from this course that could have helped this communication effort be more effective?
    6. Referring back to LDR-385, the course on teams, what team dynamics were at play at the time of the change announcement? How were these addressed (or not?). 
    7. Referring back to LDR-410, did the communication effort around this change effectively cast vision for the change effort?
    8. Using all you have learned thus far, provide a best-case scenario for how this change effort could have been communicated.  
  5. Submit your verbatim by Day 7 of the workshop. 

Review the associated rubric

Access the assignment submission page

File_e0fos28eb0ceegvzkynskzii8vdkvhs300134686957.jpg

6.2DiscussionCreateYourOwnParable.html.zip

6.2 Discussion Create Your Own Parable.html

Getting Started

Time for something new!

Throughout this course, you have read the parables of Jesus. You have also read two books written in a fable/parable style. In LDR-385 you read the fable The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Using what you have learned from reading these biblical and modern-day parables, construct your own parable designed to communicate an important leadership or organizational principle.

Begin by deciding the principle you want to communicate. You could pull from LDR-410 and communicate about the use of wisdom or about a particular value. You could pull from LDR-405 and create a parable designed to demonstrate the importance of developing others as leaders. You could pull from LDR-385 and design a parable to communicate a specific team leadership principle. We will not list every previous class you have had, but the point has been made: you have previous courses and resources you could draw on to determine your parable’s topic.

You could also consider a particular issue you are having at your organization and create a parable to use in addressing it. Maybe a particular employee does not understand how disruptive their behavior is and previous attempts have not gotten through. You could use a parable to address that.  This is just an example and it is likely that each of you has an issue at work you wish could be addressed. These are all fair game as options for your parable.

It is recommended that you test out the parable on several different people before you turn in your final version. Each time you tell the parable, you can ask the listener what principle they took away. If they are not taking away from it what you are hoping they take away, then you need to edit the parable. You can also ask them if the parable was compelling – once you started, did they want to hear the rest? Did it hold their attention? Was it too short or too long?

This should not be something you try to create the night before it is due. This is something you need to draft, edit, tell, receive feedback, edit again, retell, receive feedback, and so on until you think it is a story that is effective.

Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:

  • Construct a new parable design to communicate an important leadership or organizational principle.

Instructions

  1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. 
  2. Create an original parable to address a topic you have learned about while in the Organizational Leadership program at IWU.
  3. Whatever your topic, make sure it is clear. Do not try and address multiple topics or issues. 
  4. You may turn in a written parable or you may record yourself telling the parable. Try for something that, if you read it out loud, would be in the 3-4 minutes range. Whether you write it or record yourself:
    1. You must begin by clearly communicating what your topic is and why you are addressing it. If it is a value or team leadership principle, what is it specifically and why is it important to address in your organization at this time. 
    2. Then tell the parable. 
  5. Post your parable by the end of Day 4 of the workshop.
  6. You must respond to at least two of your peer’s submissions explaining what you thought they did well in their parable by the end of Day 7 of the workshop. 

Review the associated rubric

Access the discussion topic page

images/6.2.jpeg

PreviewRubric_6.2Discussion100points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf

6.2 Discussion (100 points) Course: 4SU2023 Communication As Leaders (LDR-415-01A)

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score

Quality of

Content

/ 4040 points

Thoroughly

addresses the

prompt(s).

Clearly

demonstrates

understanding of

relevant course

concepts.

Provides clear

evidence of critical

thinking.

36 points

Adequately

addresses the

prompt(s).

Demonstrates a

basic understanding

of relevant course

concepts.

Provides some

evidence of critical

thinking.

33 points

Partially address the

prompt(s) or

addresses only

some of the

prompts.

Demonstrates a

limited

understanding of

relevant course

concepts.

Provides limited

evidence of critical

thinking.

30 points

Minimally addresses

or does not address

the prompt(s).

Does not

adequately

demonstrate an

understanding of

relevant course

concepts or provide

evidence of critical

thinking.

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score

Communication / 25

Organization / 25

25 points

Written or recorded

is communication

clear.

Communicates

clearly through the

effective control of

grammar and

spelling.

22 points

Written or recorded

communication is

readable.

Communicates

clearly through the

control of grammar

and spelling, with

only minimal errors.

20 points

Written or recorded

communication is

not as clear due to a

few issues with the

effective control of

grammar and

spelling.

19 points

No communication

or written or

recorded

communication is

not as clear due to

many issues with

the effective control

of grammar and

spelling.

25 points

The parable is

carefully and

logically organized

with an

introduction, body,

and conclusion that

clearly identifies the

key points.

22 points

The parable is well

organized and

explains key points.

20 points

The parable has

organizational

issues that

sometimes make it

difficult to follow

the key points.

19 points

The parable is

poorly organized

and key points are

missing or difficult

to identify.

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score

Quality

Interaction

/ 55 points

Demonstrates high-

level critical

thinking through

interaction with at

least two

classmates that

advances the

discussion,

introducing new

ideas, asking

clarifying questions,

and synthesizing

concepts.

4 points

Demonstrates

critical thinking

through interaction

with two classmates

by directly

commenting on

their ideas and

making connections

to relevant content

that marginally

advances the

discussion,

introducing ideas,

asking questions.

3 points

Demonstrates

minimal critical

thinking. Interaction

is incomplete or

lacking in response

quality and/or

quantity.

2 points

Interaction is

insufficient.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score

Timely

Engagement

/ 55 points

Initial

communication is

on time.

Actively interacts in

discussion by

responding to two

classmates on two

or more different

days.

4 points

Initial

communication is

on time.

Actively interacts in

discussion by

responding to two

classmates on two

different days.

3 points

Initial

communication is

on time but

responds to only

one peer and/or on

one day only.

OR

Initial

communication is

late and responds to

only one peer

and/or on one day

only.

2 points

Initial

communication is

late.

Demonstrates no

responses to peers.

Excellent 92 points minimum

Competent 82 points minimum

Needs Improvement 72 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum

PreviewRubric_6.3Assignment135points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf

6.3 Assignment (135 points) Course: 4SU2023 Communication As Leaders (LDR-415-01A)

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Quality of

Content

/ 9090 points

Thoroughly

addresses the

prompt(s).

Clearly

demonstrates

understanding

of relevant

course

concepts using

course

materials and

additional

resources (with

citations and

references).

Provides clear

evidence of

critical

thinking.

83 points

Adequately

addresses the

prompt(s).

Demonstrates

a basic

understanding

of relevant

course

concepts using

course

materials and

additional

resources (with

citations and

references).

Provides some

evidence of

critical

thinking.

77 points

Partially

address the

prompt(s) or

addresses only

some of the

prompts.

Demonstrates

a limited

understanding

of relevant

course

concepts using

course

materials and

additional

resources (with

citations and

references).

Provides

limited

evidence of

critical

thinking.

73 points

Minimally

addresses or

does not

address the

prompt(s).

Does not

adequately

demonstrate

an

understanding

of relevant

course

concepts or

provide

evidence of

critical

thinking.

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

Written

Communicati

on

/ 25

Organization / 10

25 points

Written

communication

is easy to read

and

understand.

Communicates

clearly through

the effective

control of

grammar and

spelling.

23 points

Written

communication

is readable.

Communicates

clearly through

the control of

grammar and

spelling, with

only minimal

errors.

21 points

Written

communication

is not as clear

due to a few

issues with the

effective

control of

grammar and

spelling.

19 points

No

communication

or written

communication

is not as clear

due to many

issues with the

effective

control of

grammar and

spelling.

10 points

Paper is

carefully and

logically

organized with

an

introduction,

body, and

conclusion that

clearly

identifies the

key points.

8 points

Paper is well

organized and

explains key

points.

6 points

Paper has

organizational

issues that

sometimes

make it

difficult to

follow the key

points.

4 points

Paper is poorly

organized and

key points are

missing or

difficult to

identify.

Total / 135

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement

Inadequate/Faili ng

Criterion Score

APA

Formatting

/ 1010 points

Paper is

formatted

according to

APA style.

Source

citations and

references are

used correctly

and follow APA

form & style.

8 points

Paper is

formatted

according to

APA style.

Source

citations and

references are

used correctly

and most

follow APA

form & style.

6 points

Paper is

formatted

according to

APA style, with

some errors.

Some source

citations and

references are

missing and/or

do not follow

APA form &

style.

4 points

Paper is not

correctly

formatted

according to

APA style.

Source

citations and

references are

not used

correctly and

do not follow

APA form &

style.

Excellent 125 points minimum

Competent 111 points minimum

Needs Improvement 98 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum