E1301_1

Bandos051814

Need help with a question

  • 7 months ago
  • 30
files (3)

RoughDraft3Instructions.docx

Professor

MWP #3

Rough Draft Instructions

Length and Formatting: 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

Assignment : Submit a completed version of your paper following the containments of the essay’s instructions.

What is a Rough Draft: A rough draft is a version of your essay that is raw and unpolished, containing the main ideas put together in a coherent way. A rough draft is about making sure your ideas are present and laid out clearly (remove holes from your writing).

Purpose: Writing a rough draft is an essential part of the writing process and is an opportunity to write your first ideas and thoughts on paper. The sole purpose of a rough draft is to give you a place to start to formally put together your ideas from your mind map and sentence outline. Additionally, writing a rough draft lets you gauge if you need to do more research or change the purpose of the writing. What do I need to write a rough draft?

Constraints: Read and Review the essay instructions and make sure you are meeting the minimum requirements.

1

MWP3EssayInstructions.docx

Professor xxxx

xxxx

PAPER #3:

Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical Perspective on a

Cultural or Ethnic Group

Due: 4PM (CST), November 17th

MLA or APA format acceptable

Weight : 20% of the Final Grade

Length and Formatting: 6-8 pages, typed, double-spaced, with a left-justified margin, black 12-point, Times New Roman font, written in 3rd person.

Brainstorming for the Essay: Think about essays one and two write a few sentences about what Ethical Perspectives are at play in and among Social Circles, Communities, Education, and Employment within those essays. Next, in one sentence try to flesh out what Ethical Perspective Trevor Noah is pointing out, and what are the main points with which he seemed to want to leave readers. (Remember this is not a book report, you are using Trevor Noah as a starting point to help ground and provide evidence for your Synthesis.) Then, underneath each sentence list the evidence provided by each of the writers such as: examples? Numeric data? Or Something else?

Assignment: What is an ethical position that the population should adopt, on the role of cultural activism in relationship to formal or informal situations among Racial Group Dominance and Subordination? Consider: The value of how social circles among cultures work, how communities view cultural activism that is not of their own native origin, how educational and employment opportunities differ.

There is not one definitive answer here, but a range of possible positions, each of which may affect how we see and treat people who continue to survive in a socially controversial world. For example, the position that the majority population takes on this topic may influence the level of respect that your readers give to people who learn how to deal with different cultures. Or the position that you propose may ultimately influence the value with which many of your peers continue forming their own social circles, communities, education, or employment.

· As you write your paper, you should give specific evidence from 3 of the (individual chapters) within Trevor Noah.

· You should provide what the perspectives are within social circles, communities, education, or employment; the perspectives may overlap with one or more of the works that you cite, but even so, the highlighted position should come across clearly.

· Include one visual to illustrate your own perspective.

Audience: Imagine that your paper will be read by local city leaders who can influence the higher education and job training options in Houston. These leaders are studying the perspectives of community members like you before they do further research and then make recommendations to local leaders in education, business, and industry about the kinds of postsecondary education and/or job training to support in the coming years.

Research: If you choose to obtain outside sources you are limited to 2 sources only. Do not use Google. Resources that can be used for this assignment should only be comprised of in-class text, Jstor, or the Library. If you choose to utilize quotes from these sources for this paper, you will need to make sure you are introducing the quote or quotes correctly, make sure that it is absolutely necessary to have the author's words exactly and not your own words.

Rationale: Accurately and respectfully synthesizing other people’s texts is a large part of working with complex ideas and identifying your own position in relation to others’ ideas marks you as a discerning thinker and writer. These are among the skills that you will continue refining in ENGL 1302 and beyond. Additionally, this assignment gives you your most formal audience yet, and in doing so, the assignment forces you to polish your prose by the time you complete your final draft. Many, though not all, college and professional writing situations will require a writing tone that is formal but not stuffy. With Paper #3, you can practice using that tone.

1

Previousassignment_E1301.pdf

Explanatory Synthesis of an Ethical

Perspective on Cultural Activism under

Racial Dominance and Subordination:

Insights from Born a Crime

Selected Image

• This image illustrates the essay’s focus on cultural presence in shared spaces. It shows people from different racial and cultural backgrounds interacting freely, which highlights the central claim that multicultural communities function best when diverse identities are visible, affirmed, and not forced to conform to a single dominant norm.

Introduction

Multicultural societies must decide how to respond when subordinated racial or cultural groups assert identity or resist exclusion.

Cultural activism (language, history, music, political speech) is often misread as divisive.

Trevor Noah’s Born a Crime shows that such activism is often the only strategy for people formed under racial hierarchy (Noah 2016).

Thesis: This essay argues that the population should ethically legitimize cultural activism, because it (1) recognizes what is owed to subordinated groups, (2) corrects informal exclusion in social circles, and (3) demands institutional inclusion in education and employment.

Key Term 1: Ethical Recognition

An ethical perspective asks what is owed to groups whose lives have been shaped by dominance and subordination.

Young argues that when public norms come from the dominant group, minority claims for visibility are claims of justice, not special pleading (Young 1989, pp. 251–253).

Noah shows that in apartheid/post-apartheid South Africa, rules were made by others, but subordinated people still had to survive inside them (Noah 2016, pp. 52–54).

Therefore, the first move is active legitimation of cultural activism, not “neutrality,” which only protects dominant norms (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 142–146).

Key Term 2: Informal Belonging (Social Circles)

Informal social circles are where people first feel cultural rules and policing.

In “Chameleon,” Noah shows that belonging depended on sounding like the group and signaling the right racial position (Noah 2016, pp. 94–97).

Subordinated people do extra cultural work (code-switching, self- editing) just to be accepted.

Ethically, when they bring in their own language or cultural reference, it should be read as an attempt to equalize the space, not to fragment it — which matters for Houston-style cohort programmes.

Key Term 3: Institutional Inclusion (Education and Employment)

Schools and workplaces magnify the effects of acceptance or rejection because they are gatekeeping institutions.

Noah’s school stories show that institutions rewarded those closest to the dominant cultural template (Noah 2016, pp. 141–144; 157–160).

Cultural associations, curriculum changes, or challenges to biased recruitment are not demands for favours; they are attempts to correct standards built without subordinated groups (Kymlicka 1992, pp. 144– 147).

So, an ethical stance requires building in space for culturally grounded leadership and recognition of minority practices.

Conclusion

Cultural activism is a response to existing racial dominance, not the cause of division.

Noah, Young, and Kymlicka together show that neutrality leaves dominant norms in place (Noah 2016; Young 1989; Kymlicka 1992).

Local leaders in cities like Houston should frame cultural activism as ethically necessary for fair education and job-training outcomes.

Programmes that welcome such activism will better retain subordinated groups; programmes that suppress it will reproduce hierarchy.

Works Cited

Kymlicka, W. (1992) ‘The Rights of Minority Cultures: Reply to Kukathas’, Political Theory, 20(1), pp. 140–146. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/191782 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).

Noah, T. (2016) Born a Crime: Stories from a South African Childhood. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

Young, I.M. (1989) ‘Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship’, Ethics, 99(2), pp. 250–274. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2381434 (Accessed: 3 November 2025).