Due 7/11
see attached
25 days ago 55
ResearchPaperThesisAbstractandOutlineAssignmentInstructions.docx
ResearchPaper-ThesisAbstractandOutlineGradingRubric.pdf
ResearchPaperThesisAbstractandOutlineAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 704
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract and Outline Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will identify a problem within the field of human resource management in today’s public administration to write on for your Research Paper: Final Assignment. In this assignment, you will submit a thesis, abstract, and an outline for the final paper detailing the problem and the background on the issue.
Instructions
· You will ensure the assignment includes a biblical worldview presentation.
· The assignment should be a minimum of 4-5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
· Assignment should be submitted using proper APA formatting.
· You should incorporate a minimum of one Read item into this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-ThesisAbstractandOutlineGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Purpose
19 to >16 pts
Advanced
The thesis is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper. Abstract provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. Outline is clearly developed and incorporates all major points. All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
16 to >15 pts
Proficient
The thesis may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. Abstract may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. Outline may not provide a clear presentation of the topic and overview of major topics. Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/incorporated.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
The thesis requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. Abstract may be missing or ambiguous. Outline may be missing or is ambiguous. Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. Organization may require significant improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 19 pts
Reasoned Analysis
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used (first/second person perspective avoided). Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Most major points are stated and supported by evidence and reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas. Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas. Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 15 pts
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Support
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
At least 1 scholarly source in addition to course materials and the Bible, reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research are employed. Source material is properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Some improvements and or additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed. Clarification of source material may be needed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant improvement of scholarly support (sources, table/figure requirements) is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 15 pts
Composition and Readability
7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, and spelling is correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown. Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Sentences are generally complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Formatting 7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper is written in 12-point Times New Roman font, is double-spaced, and has 1” margins. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
Paper is generally laid out effectively and uses some reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) contains minimal inconsistencies with current APA formatting requirements. Paper may contain some inconsistencies with required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper may be laid out ineffectively or may not use sufficient reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations and/or Reference page(s) do not follow current APA formatting style/format requirements. Paper may not follow required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Page Length
7 to >6 pts
Advanced
4-5 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
More than 1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Total Points: 0
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630
ResearchPaperThesisAbstractandOutlineAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 704
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract and Outline Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will identify a problem within the field of human resource management in today’s public administration to write on for your Research Paper: Final Assignment. In this assignment, you will submit a thesis, abstract, and an outline for the final paper detailing the problem and the background on the issue.
Instructions
· You will ensure the assignment includes a biblical worldview presentation.
· The assignment should be a minimum of 4-5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
· Assignment should be submitted using proper APA formatting.
· You should incorporate a minimum of one Read item into this assignment.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-ThesisAbstractandOutlineGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Purpose
19 to >16 pts
Advanced
The thesis is clearly identified and retains focus throughout the paper. Abstract provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. Outline is clearly developed and incorporates all major points. All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
16 to >15 pts
Proficient
The thesis may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. Abstract may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. Outline may not provide a clear presentation of the topic and overview of major topics. Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/incorporated.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
The thesis requires significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. Abstract may be missing or ambiguous. Outline may be missing or is ambiguous. Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. Organization may require significant improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 19 pts
Reasoned Analysis
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used (first/second person perspective avoided). Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Most major points are stated and supported by evidence and reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas. Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas. Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 15 pts
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Support
15 to >13 pts
Advanced
At least 1 scholarly source in addition to course materials and the Bible, reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research are employed. Source material is properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
13 to >12 pts
Proficient
Some improvements and or additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed. Clarification of source material may be needed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant improvement of scholarly support (sources, table/figure requirements) is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 15 pts
Composition and Readability
7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, and spelling is correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown. Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Sentences are generally complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling. Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Formatting 7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) follow current APA formatting requirements. Paper is written in 12-point Times New Roman font, is double-spaced, and has 1” margins. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are fully addressed/incorporated.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
Paper is generally laid out effectively and uses some reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations, and Reference page(s) contains minimal inconsistencies with current APA formatting requirements. Paper may contain some inconsistencies with required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are generally addressed/ incorporated.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper may be laid out ineffectively or may not use sufficient reader-friendly aids as appropriate. Text, citations and/or Reference page(s) do not follow current APA formatting style/format requirements. Paper may not follow required font, spacing and margin requirements. Grading feedback and lessons from applicable Module are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Page Length
7 to >6 pts
Advanced
4-5 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
5 to >0 pts
Developing
More than 1 page more or less than the required length range (not counting the title page or references); double-spaced.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 7 pts
Total Points: 0
Research Paper: Thesis, Abstract, and Outline Grading Rubric | PADM704_D01_202630