Due 3/20
see attaches
3 months ago 37
ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf
ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 700
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions
Overview
The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.
Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.
Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.
The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.
Instructions
In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this Journal Article Review you will:
· Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;
· Explain the method used to support the claims of the article
· State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.
· State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)
· Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study
· Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.
· Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.
Your Journal Article Review Assignment should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification of Premise and Supporting Points
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Includes accurate identification of article premise, significant points in support of the premise, and the significance of these to the course and/or field.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Includes accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field, but one or more of them need improvement.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
One of the following is missing or insufficiently analytical: accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Synthesis 40 to >36 pts
Advanced
The review contains an accurate, detailed, and well thought out comparison of the salient points of the article.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
The review contains comparisons of the salient points of the article. The detail and critical thinking intersection is less defined.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
The review vaguely links the salient points of the article and is generally lacking in critical analysis.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Critical Evaluation of Premise and Supporting Points
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s informed and substantiated opinion, thorough evaluation of the article’s premise, and supporting points, including with respect to a biblical worldview.
54 to >50 pts
Proficient
Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s opinion and some evaluation of the article’s premise and/or arguments, including with respect to a biblical worldview, but overlooks some points.
50 to >0 pts
Developing
Student’s opinion of the article is stated, along with critical evaluation of the article’s premise and/or argument, but some significant points, including with respect to a biblical worldview, are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
APA Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Documents sources using APA formatting accurately and consistently.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Documents sources using APA formatting with minor violations.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA formatting.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Writing Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. The paper is at least 4 full pages.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. The paper is 4 pages.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors. Several minor errors in punctuation and spelling. The paper is fewer than 4 pages.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Organization 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The organization results in clarity and presents logically arranged points.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The overall arrangement is logical but can occasionally be difficult to follow.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Arrangement is less than clear, or organization is clear but there are some digressions.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202620
ResearchPaperJournalArticleReviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 700
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Assignment Instructions
Overview
The most important channel for academic research is the peer-reviewed journal article. In a peer-reviewed journal article, a scholar will: 1) propose a research question; 2) demonstrate the importance of this research question through analysis of relevant literature; 3) introduce a study that will explore the research question; 4) detail and analyze the results of that study; 5) draw conclusions from that study.
Before an article of this kind is published, it will be reviewed by other scholars who have published their own studies in this field. Typically, the identities of the study’s author(s) are not shared with reviewers and vice versa; this is to ensure that work is published based on its own merits, rather than on the popularity or personal relationships of the author.
Reviewers will critique every aspect of the study and provide anonymous feedback. Often this peer review process will require multiple refinements or revisions of the study. The goal of this process is to ensure that when the article is published, it addresses a relevant research question, it uses a sound methodological approach, it interprets data fairly and accurately, and it draws sound conclusions.
The goal of every scholar is to publish a peer-reviewed article. Before publishing a peer-reviewed article, though, it is important for the scholar to develop skill in reviewing and critically assessing such an article. That is the purpose of this assignment.
Instructions
In this assignment you will submit a review and evaluation of a single article, relevant to your dissertation research interest, that has been published in the past five years in a peer-reviewed journal. In this Journal Article Review you will:
· Identify the research question or central thesis of the article;
· Explain the method used to support the claims of the article
· State whether the method is quantitative or qualitative and give a brief explanation of the methodological approach.
· State what data is collected. (For example: Is it a public opinion poll? An analysis of historical budget data? A forecast of future COVID infections? An explanation of congressional voting patterns by ideology?)
· Explain and evaluate the conclusions drawn from the study
· Assess whether the conclusions drawn by the article’s authors seem sound based on the data they present.
· Identify any weaknesses or oversights of the article.
Your Journal Article Review Assignment should be presented in current APA format. It should be at least four pages of content in length, not including your cover page. You do not need to include a works cited page as the only item you are expected to cite is the article you are reviewing. Instead, begin your first content page with the citation of the source you are reviewing, presented in current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-JournalArticleReviewGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Identification of Premise and Supporting Points
40 to >36 pts
Advanced
Includes accurate identification of article premise, significant points in support of the premise, and the significance of these to the course and/or field.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
Includes accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field, but one or more of them need improvement.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
One of the following is missing or insufficiently analytical: accurate identification of article premise, importance to the course, significant points in support of the premise, and/or field.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Synthesis 40 to >36 pts
Advanced
The review contains an accurate, detailed, and well thought out comparison of the salient points of the article.
36 to >33 pts
Proficient
The review contains comparisons of the salient points of the article. The detail and critical thinking intersection is less defined.
33 to >0 pts
Developing
The review vaguely links the salient points of the article and is generally lacking in critical analysis.
0 pts
Not Present
40 pts
Critical Evaluation of Premise and Supporting Points
60 to >54 pts
Advanced
Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s informed and substantiated opinion, thorough evaluation of the article’s premise, and supporting points, including with respect to a biblical worldview.
54 to >50 pts
Proficient
Includes critical thinking that clearly states the student’s opinion and some evaluation of the article’s premise and/or arguments, including with respect to a biblical worldview, but overlooks some points.
50 to >0 pts
Developing
Student’s opinion of the article is stated, along with critical evaluation of the article’s premise and/or argument, but some significant points, including with respect to a biblical worldview, are overlooked.
0 pts
Not Present
60 pts
APA Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Documents sources using APA formatting accurately and consistently.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Documents sources using APA formatting with minor violations.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA formatting.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Writing Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. The paper is at least 4 full pages.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. The paper is 4 pages.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness. Minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors. Several minor errors in punctuation and spelling. The paper is fewer than 4 pages.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Organization 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The organization results in clarity and presents logically arranged points.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The overall arrangement is logical but can occasionally be difficult to follow.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Arrangement is less than clear, or organization is clear but there are some digressions.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Research Paper: Journal Article Review Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202620
- nutrition class 2
- Science
- For Quality work for all Only !!!
- Employee Health Insurance Plans
- cryptographic algorithms*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial Use as Guide Paper*****
- Assignment 2:Conducting a z-Test
- PHI-105 Module 5 Persuasive Essay First Draft- Marriage is For Everyone
- PHI-105 Module 5 Persuasive Essay First Draft - The Gun Environment in the Home
- Generating hypotheses for t-tests and ANOVAs
- Assignment 3: Review Paper—Draft of Literature Findings