Due 11/07
see attached
2 years ago 15
23.docx
23vrubic.docx
23.docx
This week, you will participate in a discussion board addressing the following:
Will the increased use of telehealth technology tools be viewed as dehumanizing patient care, or will it be viewed as a means to promote more contact with healthcare providers and as new ways for people to stay connected (e.g., online disease support groups), thereby creating better long-term disease management and patient satisfaction?
23vrubic.docx
RN-BSN Discussion Board Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Proficient |
Marginal |
Unsatisfactory
|
|
Initial Post- Timing
3 points |
Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Wednesday of the week due 3 points |
Post initial response by 11:59pm CST on Thursday of the week due 2 points |
Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Friday of the week due 1 point |
Post initial response after Friday of the week due
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Word Count
3 points
|
Post contains a minimum of 200 words
3 points |
Post contains 150-199 words
2 points |
Post contains 100-149 words
1 point |
Post contains less than 100 words
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Content
3 points |
Initial posting fully addresses ALL aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution which advances the discussion. 3 points |
Initial posting adequately addresses all aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, but lacks full development of concepts in the discussion.
2 points |
Initial posting loosely addresses all aspects of the discussion and does not add substantive information to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post an initial post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the initial post.
Reference must be different from the other two posts 3 points |
Uses a current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Word Count
3 points |
Post contains a minimum of 150 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
3 points |
Post contains 100-149 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
2 points |
Post contains 50-99 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
1 point |
Post contains less than 50 words. Response is posted after the deadline.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Content
3 points |
Demonstrates thorough analysis of peer post. Peer posts is meaningful, respectful and adds relevance to the discussion.
3 points |
Demonstrates partial analysis of peer post. Peer posts somewhat adds relevance to the discussion.
2 points |
Demonstrates incomplete analysis of peer post. Peer posts is not meaningful and does not add to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post a peer response post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the peer post. Reference must be different from the other two posts
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing.
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited, or uses the same reference in another post.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Word Count
3 points |
Post contains a minimum of 150 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
3 points |
Post contains 100-149 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
2 points |
Post contains 50-99 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
1 point |
Post contains less than 50 words. Response is posted after the deadline.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Content
3 points |
Demonstrates thorough analysis of peer post. Peer posts is meaningful, respectful and adds relevance to the discussion.
3 points |
Demonstrates partial analysis of peer post. Peer posts somewhat adds relevance to the discussion.
2 points |
Demonstrates incomplete analysis of peer post. Peer posts is not meaningful and does not add to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post a peer response post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the peer post.
Reference must be different from the other two posts
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing.
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited, or uses the same reference in another post.
0 points |
|
Participation
2 points |
Participates on at least 2 different days of the week.
2 points |
|
|
Does not participate on 2 separate days of the week. 0 points |
|
Mechanics
3 points |
Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
3 points |
1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
2 points |
3-5 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
1 point |
6 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format. 0 points |
35 Points possible
23.docx
This week, you will participate in a discussion board addressing the following:
Will the increased use of telehealth technology tools be viewed as dehumanizing patient care, or will it be viewed as a means to promote more contact with healthcare providers and as new ways for people to stay connected (e.g., online disease support groups), thereby creating better long-term disease management and patient satisfaction?
23vrubic.docx
RN-BSN Discussion Board Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Proficient |
Marginal |
Unsatisfactory
|
|
Initial Post- Timing
3 points |
Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Wednesday of the week due 3 points |
Post initial response by 11:59pm CST on Thursday of the week due 2 points |
Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Friday of the week due 1 point |
Post initial response after Friday of the week due
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Word Count
3 points
|
Post contains a minimum of 200 words
3 points |
Post contains 150-199 words
2 points |
Post contains 100-149 words
1 point |
Post contains less than 100 words
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Content
3 points |
Initial posting fully addresses ALL aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution which advances the discussion. 3 points |
Initial posting adequately addresses all aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, but lacks full development of concepts in the discussion.
2 points |
Initial posting loosely addresses all aspects of the discussion and does not add substantive information to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post an initial post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
Initial Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the initial post.
Reference must be different from the other two posts 3 points |
Uses a current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Word Count
3 points |
Post contains a minimum of 150 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
3 points |
Post contains 100-149 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
2 points |
Post contains 50-99 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
1 point |
Post contains less than 50 words. Response is posted after the deadline.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Content
3 points |
Demonstrates thorough analysis of peer post. Peer posts is meaningful, respectful and adds relevance to the discussion.
3 points |
Demonstrates partial analysis of peer post. Peer posts somewhat adds relevance to the discussion.
2 points |
Demonstrates incomplete analysis of peer post. Peer posts is not meaningful and does not add to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post a peer response post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
1st Peer Response Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the peer post. Reference must be different from the other two posts
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing.
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited, or uses the same reference in another post.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Word Count
3 points |
Post contains a minimum of 150 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
3 points |
Post contains 100-149 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
2 points |
Post contains 50-99 words. Response is posted before the deadline.
1 point |
Post contains less than 50 words. Response is posted after the deadline.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Content
3 points |
Demonstrates thorough analysis of peer post. Peer posts is meaningful, respectful and adds relevance to the discussion.
3 points |
Demonstrates partial analysis of peer post. Peer posts somewhat adds relevance to the discussion.
2 points |
Demonstrates incomplete analysis of peer post. Peer posts is not meaningful and does not add to the discussion.
1 point |
Does not post a peer response post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.
0 points |
|
2nd Peer Response Post- Reference
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the peer post.
Reference must be different from the other two posts
3 points |
Uses at least 1 current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing.
2 points |
Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.
1 point |
Does not include a reference or reference is not cited, or uses the same reference in another post.
0 points |
|
Participation
2 points |
Participates on at least 2 different days of the week.
2 points |
|
|
Does not participate on 2 separate days of the week. 0 points |
|
Mechanics
3 points |
Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
3 points |
1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
2 points |
3-5 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format.
1 point |
6 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and/or APA format. 0 points |
35 Points possible
- Answer the questions at the end of the case
- discussion
- MODULE 5 HOMEWORK
- Mini Tab software
- strengths and weaknesses as a negotiator
- A: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you†-- The Golden Rule B. “Do unto others as...
- 3 to 4 page case study on Business Environment Analysis
- Prof Turnitin only
- for WRITTER A
- Homework Completed