DUE 10/11
see attached
a month ago 50
ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf
ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 712
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions
Overview
Leadership modeling is something we do that determines how we make decisions when in a place of authority. This assignment is meant to compare and contrast the models and reflect on what these models mean to the student in their leadership journey.
Instructions
Choose one or more biblical leaders: Jesus, David, Moses or other biblical leaders and evaluate their leadership style and approaches and compare to what you have learned so far in this Module: Week.
What were their specialized approaches and in the case of leaders other than Jesus, what were their failings as a leader that we can learn from? Also consider limitations we as Christians have on bringing our faith into our workplace.
This body of the paper should be 14 – 16 pages (3,500 – 4,000 words) in length.
A minimum of 14 references are required and formatted using APA Style.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis and Thesis Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Command of Subject Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric | PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Grammar and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar used throughout essay. Posts contain fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 18 pts
APA Format Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 18 pts
Required Length and Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14 references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages and 12 references or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10 references or exceeded.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 18 pts
Total Points: -
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric | PADM712_B01_202640
ResearchPaperLeadershipSkillsFinalAssignmentInstructions.docx
PADM 712
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Assignment Instructions
Overview
Leadership modeling is something we do that determines how we make decisions when in a place of authority. This assignment is meant to compare and contrast the models and reflect on what these models mean to the student in their leadership journey.
Instructions
Choose one or more biblical leaders: Jesus, David, Moses or other biblical leaders and evaluate their leadership style and approaches and compare to what you have learned so far in this Module: Week.
What were their specialized approaches and in the case of leaders other than Jesus, what were their failings as a leader that we can learn from? Also consider limitations we as Christians have on bringing our faith into our workplace.
This body of the paper should be 14 – 16 pages (3,500 – 4,000 words) in length.
A minimum of 14 references are required and formatted using APA Style.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPaper-LeadershipSkillsFinalGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Synthesis and Thesis Development
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Command of Subject Matter
42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric | PADM712_B01_202640
Criteria Ratings Points
Application 42 to >37 pts
Advanced
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.
37 to >34 pts
Proficient
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors.
34 to >0 pts
Developing
Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 42 pts
Grammar and Spelling
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar used throughout essay. Posts contain fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Posts contain fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Posts contain fewer than 8 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 18 pts
APA Format Compliance
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimal errors (1 to 2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Few errors (3 to 4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Numerous errors noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 18 pts
Required Length and Sources
18 to >15 pts
Advanced
Minimum 14-16 pages and 14 references or exceeded.
15 to >13 pts
Proficient
Minimum 12 pages and 12 references or exceeded.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimum 10 pages and 10 references or exceeded.
0 pts
No Marks
/ 18 pts
Total Points: -
Research Paper: Leadership Skills – Final Grading Rubric | PADM712_B01_202640
- From Linear Algebra class.
- CIS 500 Case Study 2 Cloud Computing
- BUS 475 Week 2 Team Assignment Value Alignment Paper
- ACC 300 Week 5 Team Assignment Global Environments
- BSHS 471 Week 3 Individual Assignment Skills and Characteristics of Mental Health Human Services Wor
- BUS 694 Week 3 Designing an exchange management program
- BUS 680 Week 4 DQ 2 Review Questions
- PSY 450 Week 5 - Individual Ethnic Group Conflict Paper
- 2 short answers after some readings
- management essentials