Discussion board

Anjela0

Need a little help and some ideas for the discussion board. 

  • 2 years ago
  • 15
files (2)

Discussion1.docx

500 words initial post

Both Cohen's Model of Basic Student Socialization and Benner's Stages of Nursing Proficiency offer insightful frameworks for understanding the development of students and professionals in the field of nursing. Cohen's model focuses on the socialization process of nursing students into the profession, highlighting key stages such as Unilateral Dependence, Negativity/Independence, and Team Dependence. On the other hand, Benner's stages outline the progression of nursing proficiency from Novice to Expert, emphasizing the acquisition of skills, knowledge, and clinical judgment over time.

•    Why do you think it is important for you to understand the process of socialization in the profession of nursing? •    How do Cohen's stages of basic student socialization align with your own experiences or observations as a nursing student? •    Reflect on your journey through Benner's stages of nursing proficiency. Which stage do you currently identify with, and what challenges or breakthroughs have you encountered along the way? •    How do these two models complement each other in shaping the professional identity and practice of nurses? Are there any areas that overlap? Any areas of clear separation? 

Rubric.pdf

RNSG 2121 Discussion Board Grading Rubric Course: 2025SP-RNSG-2121-72201-Nurse Leadership & Management

Criteria Level 4 40 points

Level 3 30 points

Level 2 20 points

Level 1 10 points

Criterion Score

Initial Post Content / 40Initial posting is rich in

content full of thought,

insight, and analysis.

Posting thoroughly

answers the discussion

prompts and

demonstrates

understanding of

material with well-

developed ideas. Posting

integrates assigned

content and makes

strong connections to

practice.

Initial posting has

substantial information.

Thought, insight, and

analysis have taken

place.

Posting addresses most

of the prompt(s) and

demonstrates mild

understanding of

material with well-

developed ideas. Posting

references assigned

content and may not

make connections to

practice.

Initial posting is

generally competent.

Information is thin and

commonplace.

Posting fails to address

all components of the

prompt. Makes short or

irrelevant remarks.

Posting lacks connection

to practice.

Initial posting is not

relevant or no subject

matter knowledge is

evident.

Criteria Level 4 10 points

Level 3 8 points

Level 2 5 points

Level 1 0 points

Criterion Score

Initial Post Submission / 10Fully answers the

prompt by

Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

of the week assigned.

Initial posting contains

at least 2 references.

*Initial post must be a

minimum of 500 words.

Fully answers the

prompt by Friday (11:59

p.m. CST) of the week

assigned. Initial posting

contains less than 2

references.

*Initial post must be a

minimum of 500 words.

Fully answers the

prompt by

Friday (11:59 p.m. CST)

of the week assigned.

No references included.

*Initial post must be a

minimum of 500 words.

No initial posting by

Friday (11:59 pm CST)

or posting is less than

the minimum of 500

words.

Criteria Level 4 20 points

Level 3 15 points

Level 2 10 points

Level 1 5 points

Criterion Score

Peer Responses / 20Provides a minimum of

two substantive peer

replies with reference by

Monday 11:59 pm. A

minimum of one (1)

reference is required per

peer reply.

*Each peer reply must

be a minimum of 250

words.

Provides replies to two

peers with simple

comments and/or

reference(s) not

provided by Monday

11:59 pm. A minimum of

one (1) reference is

required for each peer

reply.

*Each peer reply must

be a minimum of 250

words.

Provides only one peer

reply by Monday 11:59

pm. Appropriate

references are not

included on both peer

responses.

*Each peer reply must

be a minimum of 250

words.

No replies to peer

postings or postings are

less than the minimum

of 250 words.

Criteria Level 4 15 points

Level 3 10 points

Level 2 5 points

Level 1 0 points

Criterion Score

Total / 100

Overall Score

APA Format / 15Correct APA format of

in-text citations (within

the body of the posting)

and references (in the

list). Both are required

to earn any points.

1- 2 APA errors. 3-4 APA errors. No use of APA format or

5+ errors.

Criteria Level 3 10 points

Level 2 5 points

Level 1 0 points

Criterion Score

References / 10All references are relevant,

scholarly, and within last 5

years.

Some references are not

relevant, scholarly, or more

than 5 years old.

No use of references.

Criteria Level 4 5 points

Level 3 3.5 points

Level 2 2 points

Level 1 0 points

Criterion Score

Spelling & Grammar / 5Spelling, grammar,

punctuation, mechanics

and

word usage are correct

and consistent with

American English.

Spelling, grammar,

punctuation, mechanics,

and word usage are

adequate and consistent

with American English.

errors do not interfere

with meaning or

understanding.

Spelling, grammar,

punctuation, mechanics,

and word usage are

distracting and could

interfere with meaning

or understanding.

Spelling, grammar,

punctuation, mechanics

and/or

word usage interfere

with understanding and

do not reflect scholarly

writing.

Level 4 14 points minimum

Level 3 11 points minimum

Level 2 8 points minimum

Level 1 5 points minimum