Discussion

* Suppose someone claimed to have a  device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible  effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the  claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not? 

NOTE:

1. MUST BE 300 WORDS

2. NO MLA FORMATTING REQUIRED

3. SHOULD BE A++

4. NO PLAGARISM

5.   EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL THOUGHT WITH EXAMPLES

UNDERSTANDING OF THE RELEVANT THEORIES AND CONCEPTS

6. GRAMMAR AND SPELLING