Current & Future State of Health care

Minicaa
  • 6 months ago
  • 30
files (2)

Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx

HR Management Tools and Teams

Directions: Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.

Part 1: Organization Selection

Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:

Part 2: Staffing and Work Production

As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a departmental level . Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

Quality Improvement and Management (What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?)

1.

2.

3.

Improvement and Techniques (Which techniques improve quality?)

1.

2.

3.

Tools of Management (What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?)

1.

2.

3.

Examples of Use (Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.)

1.

2.

3.

Benchmarks (What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?)

1.

2.

Examples of Use (Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.)

1.

2.

Organization Vision and Mission (Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.)

1.

2.

Alignment (How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?)

1.

2.

Part 3: Team Dynamics Successful Teams Employ

As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a team level . Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.

Characteristics (Identify characteristics of successful teams.)

1.

2.

Practices (Identify practices of successful teams.)

1.

2.

Methods and Approaches (Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.)

1.

2.

Examples of Use (Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?)

1.

2.

Part 4: Cross-Functional Application

Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.

Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:

1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.

2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.

References

© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

2

image1.jpeg

Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf

Benchmark - Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings - Rubric Total 80 points

Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than

Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

Agenda for Training

Agenda for Training

0 points

An agenda for training,

including the topic being

covered, the presenter, the

location, and the time block,

is not present.

6.24 points

An agenda for training,

including the topic being

covered, the presenter, the

location, and the time block,

is present but lacks details or

incomplete.

7.2 points

An agenda for training,

including the topic being

covered, the presenter, the

location, and the time block,

is present.

8.16 points

An agenda for training,

including the topic being

covered, the presenter, the

location, and the time block,

is detailed.

9.6 points

An agenda for training,

including the topic being

covered, the presenter, the

location, and the time block,

is thorough.

Training Schedule

Training Schedule

0 points

A training schedule that

includes the necessary

preparation of who, what,

when, where, why, and how

is not present.

6.24 points

A training schedule that

includes the necessary

preparation of who, what,

when, where, why, and how

is present, but lacks details

or incomplete.

7.2 points

A training schedule that

includes the necessary

preparation of who, what,

when, where, why, and how

is present.

8.16 points

A training schedule that

includes the necessary

preparation of who, what,

when, where, why, and how

is detailed.

9.6 points

A training schedule that

includes the necessary

preparation of who, what,

when, where, why, and how

is thorough.

Practice Training Activities

and Media or Handouts

Practice Training Activities

and Media or Handouts

0 points

A description of practice

training activities and any

media or handouts to be

provided is not present.

6.24 points

A description of practice

training activities and any

media or handouts to be

provided is present but lacks

details or incomplete.

7.2 points

A description of practice

training activities and any

media or handouts to be

provided is present.

8.16 points

A description of practice

training activities and any

media or handouts to be

provided is detailed.

9.6 points

A description of practice

training activities and any

media or handouts to be

provided is thorough.

Focus of the Program

Focus of the Program

0 points

The focus of the program is

not present.

6.24 points

The focus of the program is

present but lacks details or

incomplete.

7.2 points

The focus of the program is

present.

8.16 points

The focus of the program is

detailed.

9.6 points

The focus of the program is

thorough.

Written Materials

Written Materials

0 points

A description of written

materials to be provided

during the training is not

present.

6.24 points

A description of written

materials to be provided

during the training is present

but lacks details or

incomplete.

7.2 points

A description of written

materials to be provided

during the training is

present.

8.16 points

A description of written

materials to be provided

during the training is

detailed.

9.6 points

A description of written

materials to be provided

during the training is

thorough.

Training Element

Training Element

0 points

A description of at least one

computer-, Web-, or DVD-

based training element that

will be used in the program,

including consideration of

the idea that staff may have

varying levels of technology

readiness, is not present.

6.24 points

A description of at least one

computer-, Web-, or DVD-

based training element that

will be used in the program,

including consideration of

the idea that staff may have

varying levels of technology

readiness, is present but

lacks details or incomplete.

7.2 points

A description of at least one

computer-, Web-, or DVD-

based training element that

will be used in the program,

including consideration of

the idea that staff may have

varying levels of technology

readiness, is present.

8.16 points

A description of at least one

computer-, Web-, or DVD-

based training element that

will be used in the program,

including consideration of

the idea that staff may have

varying levels of technology

readiness, is detailed.

9.6 points

A description of at least one

computer-, Web-, or DVD-

based training element that

will be used in the program,

including consideration of

the idea that staff may have

varying levels of technology

readiness, is thorough.

Leveraging Workforce

Diversity (B)

Leveraging Workforce

Diversity (C3.2)

0 points

An explanation of how

organizations can leverage

workforce diversity and a

description of the benefits of

diverse knowledge, skills, and

expertise among team

members are not present.

6.76 points

An explanation of how

organizations can leverage

workforce diversity and a

description of the benefits of

diverse knowledge, skills, and

expertise among team

members are present but

lack details or are

incomplete.

7.8 points

An explanation of how

organizations can leverage

workforce diversity and a

description of the benefits of

diverse knowledge, skills, and

expertise among team

members are present.

8.84 points

An explanation of how

organizations can leverage

workforce diversity and a

description of the benefits of

diverse knowledge, skills, and

expertise among team

members are detailed.

10.4 points

An explanation of how

organizations can leverage

workforce diversity and a

description of the benefits of

diverse knowledge, skills, and

expertise among team

members are thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive

enough that they impede

communication of meaning.

4.16 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader. Inconsistencies in

4.8 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting to

5.44 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors, although

a few may be present. The

6.4 points

Writer is clearly in command

of standard, written, © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than

Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

Inappropriate word choice or

sentence construction is

used.

language choice (register) or

word choice are present.

Sentence structure is correct

but not varied.

the reader. Correct and

varied sentence structure

and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

writer uses a variety of

effective sentence structures

and figures of speech.

academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources

(citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography, etc.,

as appropriate to assignment

and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.64 points

Documentation of sources is

inconsistent or incorrect, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, with numerous

formatting errors.

4.2 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, although some

formatting errors may be

present.

4.76 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is

mostly correct.

5.6 points

Sources are completely and

correctly documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free

of error.

© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.