Concepts
Help with concepts
2 years ago 34
Writea4.docxassessement.docx
cf_Exemplar_NHS-FPX4000_Assessment_4.pdf
Writea4.docxassessement.docx
Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.
Collapse All
Introduction
In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills, you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then, you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects. You can also examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real-world problem.
Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
1. Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.
· As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
· Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
2. Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
· Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
· You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
· You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
· You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
· Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
· Assess the credibility of the information sources.
· Assess the relevance of the information sources.
3. Analyze the health care problem or issue.
· Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
· Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
· Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
· Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
4. Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
· Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
· Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
· Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
5. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
· Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
· Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
· Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
· Assessment 4 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 4 Example [PDF] .
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
· Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
· APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
· Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
· Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
· References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
· APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
· Title page. A separate page.
· Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
· Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
· Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
· Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
· Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
· Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
· Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
· Conclusion. One paragraph.
Competencies Measured:
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
· Use scholarly information to describe and explain a health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
· Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care.
· Analyze a health care problem or issue by describing the context, explaining why it is important and identifying populations affected by it.
· Discuss potential solutions for a health care problem or issue and describe what would be required to implement a solution.
· Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
· Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented
· Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.
· Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
· Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
cf_Exemplar_NHS-FPX4000_Assessment_4.pdf
1
Analyzing Healthcare Issues
Your Name
Capella University
NHS4000: Developing a Healthcare Perspective
Instructor Name
Month, Year
2
Health disparities among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) remain a persistent
challenge in healthcare reflecting systemic inequalities that impact access, outcomes, and overall well-
being. This paper will explain this issue of health care disparities for low SES people, analyze the
contributing factors, compare potential solutions, discuss ethical considerations surrounding the
implementation of these solutions, and how solutions can benefit individuals with their chronic disease
management.
Health Disparities for Low SES People
Low SES individuals face a health disparity because of social determinants that extend beyond
the healthcare system. These determinants include income, education, employment, housing, and
access to healthcare resources (Jones, et al., 2022). Individuals with low SES often encounter barriers in
accessing quality healthcare services, leading to delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and poorer
health outcomes.
Factors contributing to health disparities include limited financial resources, lack of health
insurance, transportation challenges, and reduced health literacy (Garcia, et al., 2023). These individuals
may experience higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which can
be exacerbated by inadequate access to preventive care and health education (Jones, et al., 2022).
Analyzing Health Disparities for Low SES People
Studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with lower SES experience higher mortality
rates, increased prevalence of chronic diseases, and reduced life expectancy compared to their higher
SES counterparts (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The disparities due to lower SES can include limited financial
resources, transportation and technology which can limit their ability to attend needed appointments to
not only treat illness, but also provide preventative care. Individuals may want to attend needed
appointments and take their prescriptions as ordered but may lack the ability to do so because of
financial limitations.
3
Comparing and Contrasting Solutions
One solution is the expansion of community health clinics and mobile healthcare units to
enhance accessibility along with the use of telemedicine. These initiatives bring healthcare services
directly to underserved populations. This eliminates the individuals missing their appointments because
there is not adequate transportation.
Another strategy involves targeted public health education campaigns that raise awareness
about preventive measures, available resources, and the importance of regular health check-ups.
Increasing health literacy empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health and
navigate the healthcare system more effectively. The goal of this strategy is to make individuals aware of
the services available to them so they can improve their overall health and wellbeing.
To help individuals be able to afford healthcare services, healthcare providers can implement
financial assistance programs and sliding scale fees for low SES individuals (Smith & Johnson, 2021).
These initiatives aim to reduce financial barriers, ensuring that cost does not deter individuals from
seeking necessary medical care.
Ethical Principles in Implementing Solutions
The implementation of solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals must be
guided by ethical principles. The creation of mobile healthcare units follows the four ethical principles of
beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy and justice.
Beneficence requires interventions that actively promote the well-being of individuals, focusing
on improving access to healthcare, preventive services, and health education. Having a mobile unit
ensures low SES individuals will have access to care available to them. Nonmaleficence calls for the
avoidance of harm, emphasizing the importance of addressing the root causes of health disparities. The
4
mobile clinics address the issue of individuals not having transportation to attend needed healthcare
visits.
Respecting autonomy involves recognizing low SES individuals in their healthcare decisions. The
mobile healthcare units allow the individual to decide to seek treatment and give them the option to
attend appointments they may not have been able to because of limited transportation.
Justice is a fundamental ethical principle that underscores the need for fair and equitable distribution of
healthcare resources. The utilization of a mobile healthcare clinic helps those in need to be able to seek
out and obtain healthcare when needed, promoting equal access to quality healthcare for all.
Solutions and Chronic Disease Management
The proposed solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals have direct
implications for chronic disease management. Community-based interventions and increased access to
healthcare services enhance the continuum of care for individuals with chronic conditions.
Providing a mobile healthcare clinic is beneficial for chronic disease management among low SES
populations. The mobile clinic provides a convenient and accessible means for individuals to consult
healthcare professionals, monitor their conditions, and receive timely advice, especially in areas with
limited healthcare infrastructure.
Conclusion
In conclusion, addressing health disparities for low SES individuals is a complex process that
requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, thoughtful analysis, and ethical
considerations in the implementation of solutions. The creation and use of a mobile clinic can help
bridge the gap in healthcare access and promote preventive care while upholding ethical principles. A
mobile clinic creates a location that benefits all individuals, particularly those facing chronic diseases in
low SES communities.
5
References
Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health
outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.
Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic
Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125.
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the Gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal
of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58.
Writea4.docxassessement.docx
Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.
Collapse All
Introduction
In your health care career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills, you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then, you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects. You can also examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real-world problem.
Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
1. Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.
· As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
· Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
2. Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
· Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
· You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references.
· You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
· You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
· Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
· Assess the credibility of the information sources.
· Assess the relevance of the information sources.
3. Analyze the health care problem or issue.
· Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
· Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
· Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
· Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.
4. Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.
· Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
· Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
· Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
5. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
· Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
· Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.
· Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
· Assessment 4 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 4 Example [PDF] .
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
· Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
· APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
· Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
· Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
· References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
· APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
· Title page. A separate page.
· Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
· Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
· Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
· Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
· Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
· Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
· Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
· Conclusion. One paragraph.
Competencies Measured:
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
· Use scholarly information to describe and explain a health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
· Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care.
· Analyze a health care problem or issue by describing the context, explaining why it is important and identifying populations affected by it.
· Discuss potential solutions for a health care problem or issue and describe what would be required to implement a solution.
· Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
· Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented
· Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella's writing standards.
· Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
· Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
cf_Exemplar_NHS-FPX4000_Assessment_4.pdf
1
Analyzing Healthcare Issues
Your Name
Capella University
NHS4000: Developing a Healthcare Perspective
Instructor Name
Month, Year
2
Health disparities among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) remain a persistent
challenge in healthcare reflecting systemic inequalities that impact access, outcomes, and overall well-
being. This paper will explain this issue of health care disparities for low SES people, analyze the
contributing factors, compare potential solutions, discuss ethical considerations surrounding the
implementation of these solutions, and how solutions can benefit individuals with their chronic disease
management.
Health Disparities for Low SES People
Low SES individuals face a health disparity because of social determinants that extend beyond
the healthcare system. These determinants include income, education, employment, housing, and
access to healthcare resources (Jones, et al., 2022). Individuals with low SES often encounter barriers in
accessing quality healthcare services, leading to delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and poorer
health outcomes.
Factors contributing to health disparities include limited financial resources, lack of health
insurance, transportation challenges, and reduced health literacy (Garcia, et al., 2023). These individuals
may experience higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which can
be exacerbated by inadequate access to preventive care and health education (Jones, et al., 2022).
Analyzing Health Disparities for Low SES People
Studies consistently demonstrate that individuals with lower SES experience higher mortality
rates, increased prevalence of chronic diseases, and reduced life expectancy compared to their higher
SES counterparts (Smith & Johnson, 2021). The disparities due to lower SES can include limited financial
resources, transportation and technology which can limit their ability to attend needed appointments to
not only treat illness, but also provide preventative care. Individuals may want to attend needed
appointments and take their prescriptions as ordered but may lack the ability to do so because of
financial limitations.
3
Comparing and Contrasting Solutions
One solution is the expansion of community health clinics and mobile healthcare units to
enhance accessibility along with the use of telemedicine. These initiatives bring healthcare services
directly to underserved populations. This eliminates the individuals missing their appointments because
there is not adequate transportation.
Another strategy involves targeted public health education campaigns that raise awareness
about preventive measures, available resources, and the importance of regular health check-ups.
Increasing health literacy empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health and
navigate the healthcare system more effectively. The goal of this strategy is to make individuals aware of
the services available to them so they can improve their overall health and wellbeing.
To help individuals be able to afford healthcare services, healthcare providers can implement
financial assistance programs and sliding scale fees for low SES individuals (Smith & Johnson, 2021).
These initiatives aim to reduce financial barriers, ensuring that cost does not deter individuals from
seeking necessary medical care.
Ethical Principles in Implementing Solutions
The implementation of solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals must be
guided by ethical principles. The creation of mobile healthcare units follows the four ethical principles of
beneficence, nonmaleficence and autonomy and justice.
Beneficence requires interventions that actively promote the well-being of individuals, focusing
on improving access to healthcare, preventive services, and health education. Having a mobile unit
ensures low SES individuals will have access to care available to them. Nonmaleficence calls for the
avoidance of harm, emphasizing the importance of addressing the root causes of health disparities. The
4
mobile clinics address the issue of individuals not having transportation to attend needed healthcare
visits.
Respecting autonomy involves recognizing low SES individuals in their healthcare decisions. The
mobile healthcare units allow the individual to decide to seek treatment and give them the option to
attend appointments they may not have been able to because of limited transportation.
Justice is a fundamental ethical principle that underscores the need for fair and equitable distribution of
healthcare resources. The utilization of a mobile healthcare clinic helps those in need to be able to seek
out and obtain healthcare when needed, promoting equal access to quality healthcare for all.
Solutions and Chronic Disease Management
The proposed solutions to address health disparities for low SES individuals have direct
implications for chronic disease management. Community-based interventions and increased access to
healthcare services enhance the continuum of care for individuals with chronic conditions.
Providing a mobile healthcare clinic is beneficial for chronic disease management among low SES
populations. The mobile clinic provides a convenient and accessible means for individuals to consult
healthcare professionals, monitor their conditions, and receive timely advice, especially in areas with
limited healthcare infrastructure.
Conclusion
In conclusion, addressing health disparities for low SES individuals is a complex process that
requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, thoughtful analysis, and ethical
considerations in the implementation of solutions. The creation and use of a mobile clinic can help
bridge the gap in healthcare access and promote preventive care while upholding ethical principles. A
mobile clinic creates a location that benefits all individuals, particularly those facing chronic diseases in
low SES communities.
5
References
Garcia, R., Hickey, M. T., Stillo, M., & Marquez, C. (2023). The impact of public transportation on health
outcomes: A longitudinal study of low SES individuals. Journal of Nursing, 30(1), 78-91.
Jones, M., King, O., Shaw, N. (2022). Access to primary care services for low SES individuals: A systematic
Review. Journal of Health Equity, 8(2), 112-125.
Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2021). Bridging the Gap: Nursing interventions for low SES populations. Journal
of Nursing Research, 25(3), 45-58.