Case study
6 months ago 30
GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf
GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf
Grading Rubric for Team Case Study Reports Outstanding full points Good 80% of points Acceptable 60% of points Poor less than 50% of points
Problem and Issue Identification (20 points)
Case Report identifies key facts relevant to case and show how case facts lead to a particular focus for analysis.
Case Report identifies most, but not all key facts relevant to the case and ties facts to a particular focus for the analysis.
Case Report identifies most, but not all key facts relevant to the case and ties facts to a particular focus for the analysis.
Case Report misses most significant key facts of case or ties them to an incorrect focus for case analysis.
Analysis (40 points)
Report explores trends in general environment to predict future environmental concerns. Key competitors are analyzed for strategy, core competencies, and competitive response.
Two or three minor elements of analysis are incorrect – team may not have covered all factors or analyzed key competitors completely.
Two or three elements of analysis are incorrect – team may not have covered all factors or analyzed key competitors completely.
Analysis is significantly incorrect – factors are incorrectly identified, areas of analysis are missing or incomplete and key competitors either not identified or analysis is superficial.
Formulation of Alternatives and Selected Recommendation (20 points)
Report contains three to four alternative strategies that are feasible and take advantage of opportunities and avoid threats. Strategies are clearly linked to analysis. An analysis of the alternatives tells why the recommendation is the best.
Report contains at least three strategies that are linked to analysis. Information is given about why the recommendation is better than other strategies, but logic, while reasonable, may not be entirely laid out.
Report contains less than three strategies that are linked to analysis. Some information is given about why the recommendation is better than other strategies, but the logic is not very clearly laid out.
Report contains fewer than tw0 alternative strategies. Strategies are not clearly linked to analysis, or are incorrect based on analysis (for example, marketing a product that is a competitive advantage for another company.)
Implementation of Recommendation (20 points)
Report explicitly outlines and explains what steps must be taken to implement chosen strategy, including structural or leadership
Report covers key steps needed to implement chosen strategy but may not cover all steps. Recommendation
Report covers some steps needed to implement chosen strategy. Recommendation’s connection to analysis is not completely clear.
Report does not include key implementation steps needed to put strategy into practice, and/or little or no rationale is given for
changes. Recommendations flow from analysis.
generally connected to analysis – may not provide all specifics.
suggested implementation practices.
Process Issues (20 points)
Report is logically consistent. Alternatives and recommendation flow from analysis. Report/presentation is thorough and clear, containing a comprehensive analysis and clean links between analysis and recommendations.
Report contains generally clear and logical analysis. It is complete, although more information is needed to make it as thorough as it should be. Recommendations are generally feasible, but more information would help show how they flow from analysis.
Report contains logical analysis that is only somewhat clear. It is not complete, much more information is needed to make it as thorough as it should be. Little information is provided about how recommendations flow from analysis.
Report is not logically consistent. Little information is given that helps reader know why recommendations are given, or recommendations don’t flow from other information. Report/presentation does not have clarity of purpose.
GradingRubricforTeamCaseStudyReports1.pdf
Grading Rubric for Team Case Study Reports Outstanding full points Good 80% of points Acceptable 60% of points Poor less than 50% of points
Problem and Issue Identification (20 points)
Case Report identifies key facts relevant to case and show how case facts lead to a particular focus for analysis.
Case Report identifies most, but not all key facts relevant to the case and ties facts to a particular focus for the analysis.
Case Report identifies most, but not all key facts relevant to the case and ties facts to a particular focus for the analysis.
Case Report misses most significant key facts of case or ties them to an incorrect focus for case analysis.
Analysis (40 points)
Report explores trends in general environment to predict future environmental concerns. Key competitors are analyzed for strategy, core competencies, and competitive response.
Two or three minor elements of analysis are incorrect – team may not have covered all factors or analyzed key competitors completely.
Two or three elements of analysis are incorrect – team may not have covered all factors or analyzed key competitors completely.
Analysis is significantly incorrect – factors are incorrectly identified, areas of analysis are missing or incomplete and key competitors either not identified or analysis is superficial.
Formulation of Alternatives and Selected Recommendation (20 points)
Report contains three to four alternative strategies that are feasible and take advantage of opportunities and avoid threats. Strategies are clearly linked to analysis. An analysis of the alternatives tells why the recommendation is the best.
Report contains at least three strategies that are linked to analysis. Information is given about why the recommendation is better than other strategies, but logic, while reasonable, may not be entirely laid out.
Report contains less than three strategies that are linked to analysis. Some information is given about why the recommendation is better than other strategies, but the logic is not very clearly laid out.
Report contains fewer than tw0 alternative strategies. Strategies are not clearly linked to analysis, or are incorrect based on analysis (for example, marketing a product that is a competitive advantage for another company.)
Implementation of Recommendation (20 points)
Report explicitly outlines and explains what steps must be taken to implement chosen strategy, including structural or leadership
Report covers key steps needed to implement chosen strategy but may not cover all steps. Recommendation
Report covers some steps needed to implement chosen strategy. Recommendation’s connection to analysis is not completely clear.
Report does not include key implementation steps needed to put strategy into practice, and/or little or no rationale is given for
changes. Recommendations flow from analysis.
generally connected to analysis – may not provide all specifics.
suggested implementation practices.
Process Issues (20 points)
Report is logically consistent. Alternatives and recommendation flow from analysis. Report/presentation is thorough and clear, containing a comprehensive analysis and clean links between analysis and recommendations.
Report contains generally clear and logical analysis. It is complete, although more information is needed to make it as thorough as it should be. Recommendations are generally feasible, but more information would help show how they flow from analysis.
Report contains logical analysis that is only somewhat clear. It is not complete, much more information is needed to make it as thorough as it should be. Little information is provided about how recommendations flow from analysis.
Report is not logically consistent. Little information is given that helps reader know why recommendations are given, or recommendations don’t flow from other information. Report/presentation does not have clarity of purpose.