case study
3 years ago 30
CaseReviewAssignmentSample.pdf
Casestudyadminlaw.docx
CaseReviewAssignmentSample.pdf
Case Review Assignment Example:
CITATION: Cross v. Guthery, 2 Root 90 (Conn. 1794)
FACTS: The case of Cross v. Guthery is known as the first major law case in the U.S. A
physician was held legally responsible for negligence in 1794. Dr. Guthery performed surgery on
Mrs. Cross after she discovered that something was wrong with her breast. Dr. Guthery removed
her breast and shortly after she bled to death. A bill was sent to Mr. Cross after his wife's death
for 15 pounds. Mr. Cross then decided to take legal action against Dr. Guthery in which he
requested 40 pounds for his wife’s death (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
ISSUE: Did the surgery Dr. Guthery performed on Mrs. Cross after she discovered something
was wrong with her breast result in her bleeding to death? Should Mr. Cross be responsible for
paying bill rendered by Dr. Guthery (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23)?
HOLDING: A jury dismissed Guthery’s bill and awarded Mr. Cross 40 pounds as compensation
for the loss of his wife’s companionship (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
REASON: Dr. Guthery performed surgery on Mrs. Cross resulting in removing her breast and
shortly after she bled to death. The court ruled in favor of the victim, writing that the doctor was
required to perform the surgery with “skill and safety” but instead performed it “in the most
unskillful, ignorant and cruel manner, contrary to all the well-known rules and principles of
practice in such cases” (Karlson & Erwin, 1979, p. 653).
PERCEPTION:
• Political- This case could be seen as the first recorded malpractice case involving a
physician; marking the beginning of substantial recurring malpractice cases in the field of
healthcare (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
• Social: This case could have been detrimental to Dr. Guthery’s reputation as a physician
and his practice.
• Economic: This case was an economic loss to Dr. Guthery and economic gain to Mr.
Cross.
References:
Pozgar, G. D. (2019). Legal aspects of health care administration (13th ed.). Jones & Bartlett
Learning.
Karlson, H. C. & Erwin, R. D. (1979). Medical malpractice: Informed consent to the locality
rule. Indiana Law Review, 12(4), 653.
Casestudyadminlaw.docx
After reviewing the selected cases below in the course textbook, students are tasked with selecting 5 cited cases from the list below and identify/address the following for each case:
· citation
· facts
· issue
· holding
· reason
· your perception of its political, social, and/or economic impact on the healthcare system
Selected Case Review List:
|
Cited Cases |
Chapter Found |
Page Number |
|
Hargrave v. Landon |
6 |
107 |
|
Hungerford Hospital v. Mulvey |
7 |
118-119 |
|
Nail v. Laros |
8 |
153-154 |
|
Bouquett v. St. Elizabeth's Corp. |
9 |
193 |
|
Goodwich v. Sinai Hospital |
10 |
229-230 |
|
Bowe v. Charleston Area Medical Center |
11 |
267-268 |
|
Simmons v. Tuomey Regional Medical Center |
12 |
306-308 |
|
Braick v. New York State Department of Health |
13 |
344 |
|
Stoick v. Caro Community Hospital |
14 |
388 |
|
Williams v. Bd. of Exam’rs for Prof. Nurses |
15 |
428 |
|
Payne v. Marion General Hospital |
17 |
469 |
|
Awkerman v. TriCounty Orthopedic Group |
18 |
503 |
Please refer to the Case Review Assignment Sample Download Case Review Assignment Sample and Case Review Rubric Assessment Scale (syllabus) when completing case reviews. You’re welcome to utilize additional sources if/when needed. However, additional sources are not to take the place of your required reading material.
**Note: Be sure to provide original responses when addressing cases. Point deductions will be given for unoriginal work.
CaseReviewAssignmentSample.pdf
Case Review Assignment Example:
CITATION: Cross v. Guthery, 2 Root 90 (Conn. 1794)
FACTS: The case of Cross v. Guthery is known as the first major law case in the U.S. A
physician was held legally responsible for negligence in 1794. Dr. Guthery performed surgery on
Mrs. Cross after she discovered that something was wrong with her breast. Dr. Guthery removed
her breast and shortly after she bled to death. A bill was sent to Mr. Cross after his wife's death
for 15 pounds. Mr. Cross then decided to take legal action against Dr. Guthery in which he
requested 40 pounds for his wife’s death (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
ISSUE: Did the surgery Dr. Guthery performed on Mrs. Cross after she discovered something
was wrong with her breast result in her bleeding to death? Should Mr. Cross be responsible for
paying bill rendered by Dr. Guthery (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23)?
HOLDING: A jury dismissed Guthery’s bill and awarded Mr. Cross 40 pounds as compensation
for the loss of his wife’s companionship (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
REASON: Dr. Guthery performed surgery on Mrs. Cross resulting in removing her breast and
shortly after she bled to death. The court ruled in favor of the victim, writing that the doctor was
required to perform the surgery with “skill and safety” but instead performed it “in the most
unskillful, ignorant and cruel manner, contrary to all the well-known rules and principles of
practice in such cases” (Karlson & Erwin, 1979, p. 653).
PERCEPTION:
• Political- This case could be seen as the first recorded malpractice case involving a
physician; marking the beginning of substantial recurring malpractice cases in the field of
healthcare (Pozgar, 2019, p. 23).
• Social: This case could have been detrimental to Dr. Guthery’s reputation as a physician
and his practice.
• Economic: This case was an economic loss to Dr. Guthery and economic gain to Mr.
Cross.
References:
Pozgar, G. D. (2019). Legal aspects of health care administration (13th ed.). Jones & Bartlett
Learning.
Karlson, H. C. & Erwin, R. D. (1979). Medical malpractice: Informed consent to the locality
rule. Indiana Law Review, 12(4), 653.
Casestudyadminlaw.docx
After reviewing the selected cases below in the course textbook, students are tasked with selecting 5 cited cases from the list below and identify/address the following for each case:
· citation
· facts
· issue
· holding
· reason
· your perception of its political, social, and/or economic impact on the healthcare system
Selected Case Review List:
|
Cited Cases |
Chapter Found |
Page Number |
|
Hargrave v. Landon |
6 |
107 |
|
Hungerford Hospital v. Mulvey |
7 |
118-119 |
|
Nail v. Laros |
8 |
153-154 |
|
Bouquett v. St. Elizabeth's Corp. |
9 |
193 |
|
Goodwich v. Sinai Hospital |
10 |
229-230 |
|
Bowe v. Charleston Area Medical Center |
11 |
267-268 |
|
Simmons v. Tuomey Regional Medical Center |
12 |
306-308 |
|
Braick v. New York State Department of Health |
13 |
344 |
|
Stoick v. Caro Community Hospital |
14 |
388 |
|
Williams v. Bd. of Exam’rs for Prof. Nurses |
15 |
428 |
|
Payne v. Marion General Hospital |
17 |
469 |
|
Awkerman v. TriCounty Orthopedic Group |
18 |
503 |
Please refer to the Case Review Assignment Sample Download Case Review Assignment Sample and Case Review Rubric Assessment Scale (syllabus) when completing case reviews. You’re welcome to utilize additional sources if/when needed. However, additional sources are not to take the place of your required reading material.
**Note: Be sure to provide original responses when addressing cases. Point deductions will be given for unoriginal work.