Asssigment
a year ago 10
Template11.docx
EBP.docx
JournalReviewRubric.docx
Template11.docx
( Title)
by:
Student Name
(Student ID)
Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing
(NRSE 500)
(Date)
image1.png
EBP.docx
EBP - Research Article Review
Instructions
Each student must select and review a research article related to Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).
1. Select a Research Article focus on EBP
2. Provide a concise summary of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).
3. Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN
· Explain how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.
· Discuss how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.
4. Format requirements:
· Use the provided template as your cover page.
· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.
· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper
5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.
Submission Instructions:
· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin, review the information in the Student Resource Center about it.
Template:
JournalReviewRubric.docx
Journal Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exemplary (10 pts) |
Proficient (8-9 pts) |
Developing (6-7 pts) |
Needs Improvement (0-5 pts) |
|
Summary of Content |
Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. |
Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. |
Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. |
Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
|
Critical Analysis |
Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. |
Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. |
Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. |
Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
|
Reflection |
Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. |
Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. |
Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. |
Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
|
Organization & Clarity |
Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. |
Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
|
APA Formatting |
Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. |
Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. |
APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. |
Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
Total Points: ____/50
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Professor Date
©Prof. Emily Diaz
AGMU-2025 MS Nursing
image1.png
Template11.docx
( Title)
by:
Student Name
(Student ID)
Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing
(NRSE 500)
(Date)
image1.png
EBP.docx
EBP - Research Article Review
Instructions
Each student must select and review a research article related to Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) from a reliable research database (ProQuest; CINAHL; Google Scholar).
1. Select a Research Article focus on EBP
2. Provide a concise summary of the article's main findings (Do not summarize the abstract).
3. Analyze the Connection to EBP in APN
· Explain how the research findings relate to EBP in Advanced Practice Nursing.
· Discuss how the article contributes to enhancing the APN profession through the application of evidence-based practices.
4. Format requirements:
· Use the provided template as your cover page.
· Follow APA 7th edition guidelines for formatting.
· Include the article as a properly formatted reference in your paper
5. Make sure your work is clear, concise, and adheres to academic standards.
Submission Instructions:
· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. If you are new to Turnitin, review the information in the Student Resource Center about it.
Template:
JournalReviewRubric.docx
Journal Review Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exemplary (10 pts) |
Proficient (8-9 pts) |
Developing (6-7 pts) |
Needs Improvement (0-5 pts) |
|
Summary of Content |
Clearly and concisely summarizes the article, capturing key points, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions. |
Provides a good summary of the article, but some details or key points may be slightly unclear or omitted. |
Summarizes the article but misses important details or includes inaccuracies. |
Summary is incomplete, lacks clarity, or includes significant inaccuracies. |
|
Critical Analysis |
Demonstrates a deep understanding of the article by critically analyzing its strengths, weaknesses, and implications. |
Provides an analysis of the article, though it may lack depth or miss some critical aspects. |
Offers limited analysis with minimal insight into the article’s strengths, weaknesses, or implications. |
Little or no analysis is provided, or analysis lacks coherence and understanding. |
|
Reflection |
Thoughtfully connects the article’s content to course concepts or professional practice, offering meaningful personal insights. |
Makes connections to course concepts or practice, but insights may not be fully developed or articulated. |
Connections to course concepts or practice are superficial, with limited reflection or personal insight. |
Reflection is missing or shows no connection to course concepts or professional practice. |
|
Organization & Clarity |
Review is well-organized, with clear and logical flow. Writing is concise, precise, and free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. |
Review is organized and easy to follow, though there may be minor issues with clarity or grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
Organization is weak, and writing may be unclear or contain frequent errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
Review lacks organization and clarity, making it difficult to follow. Writing contains numerous errors that detract from the overall quality. |
|
APA Formatting |
Properly cites and references the article and any additional sources using APA format. In-text citations and reference list are error-free. |
Cites and references the article and sources using APA format, with minor errors. |
APA citations and references are incomplete or contain multiple errors. |
Fails to cite or reference the article correctly, or APA format is not used. |
Total Points: ____/50
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Professor Date
©Prof. Emily Diaz
AGMU-2025 MS Nursing